RLD
AH fanatic
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2025
- Messages
- 856
- Reaction score
- 1,592
- Location
- Canada
- Member of
- SCI, CSSA, OFAH, DSC
- Hunted
- Canada, USA, Austria
This gives me the impression that you and I have read many of the same books on the subject!Its incredibly hard to deny that Jesus was a living historical figure.. he is not only acknowledged by the Christian faith, but also by the Jewish faith and the Muslim faith.. and there are NUMEROUS historical documents that are NOT tied to any faith that speak to his existence.. I dont think anyone that is even remotely educated or capable of reading history can deny that there was a man that walked the earth in the first century that was named Jesus that was a religious leader that was ultimately executed by the Romans.. there are far too many validated and verified historical documents that prove it..
The only question is.. was he God? a prophet? a very wise and learned Rabbi? or just some guy that convinced others to follow him?
Flavious Josephus, a Jewish historian, speaks about Jesus twice in his historical account Jewish Antiquities. He talks about the crucifixion and that Jesus was a "wise" man capable of "surprising deeds"..
Tacitus, a Roman historian wrote in his Annals that Jesus was executed by Pontius Pilate during Tiberious's reign..
Suetonieus, another Roman historian wrote about disturbances happening in Rome that were caused by followers of Jesus after his crucifixion
Thallus a greco-roman historian wrote about the day of Jesus' crucifixion.. etc..
None of these people early Christians.. they were all historians that were simply documenting things happening in their time, and the impacts of those happenings on Rome, the middle east, and the rest of the world..
While no actual documents drafted or written by Pontius Pilate are known to exist (havent been found), there are several accounts from others that were close to Pilate that have documented the impact of the trial and execution of Jesus on Pilate that confirm the trial and execution happened.
There are some interesting questions around the Josephus document, but overall I think it stands up to scrutiny.
To put it in comparative historical context, there are more documents closer in time, confirming the existence of the historical Christ, than there are documents closer in time confirming the existence of the historical Alexander. But Alexander crushes Jesus in numismatics. So the simple answer to the individual who denies the existence of historical Jesus is "Do you believe Alexander the Great existed?"


