I am a little curious on Denmark’s position on Greenland. They find themselves in a tremendous negotiating position with the most influential person on the planet. They could change the future of their country dramatically with preferential trade deals, cash infusion, trailing royalties, strengthened military alliances, etc.. At the same time, they could negotiate life changing payoffs to every man, woman and child in Greenland. Do they really love that frozen island that much?
Regarding Denmark, same thing as UK - Falkland islands. (Except, UK had Navy to send). But same attitude.
In my opinion, EU is in shock, and lost their bearings. Things on daily basis are such, I cannot follow, and I dont know what to expect tommorow.
They find themselves in same positions, I am afraid.
EU, short history decision making:
US stopped weapons aid - EU Agreed to pay the weapons for Ukraine. US will sell.
US announced tariffs, and what not: EU agreed to sign trade deal with US on short notice, some months ago. Buy energy, etc
US asking to increase defense spending: EU Decided to invest in EU defense industry 800 million
Yesterday was Davos meeting, probably not going well: Today, EU decided to invest in various developing programs on Greenland.
Does that sound like a little bit too late?
Where the money comes from?
All Ad hoc decisions, based on daily events.
Big meetings held ad hoc all over EU capitals, on daily basis. like never before, in last year.
It is all going nowhere.
And all those strategic decisions, made in last moment, basically 5 minutes after Washington post, or CNN launch next breaking news. It is reaction to news portals.
Two days ago, nobody was thinking of this, for example.
This is a reaction to whatever was happening in Davos.
EU wants to revive trade ties with the US, but warned the bloc will stand up for its interests. It also announced after an emergency summit that it will double its investment in Greenland.
www.dw.com