on a lighter note...

489815170_10233024957399226_6708263921173484869_n.jpg
 
1744392598127.png
 
1744392723710.png
 
IMG_1507.jpeg
 
They're both wrong - the answer is 12.

The commutative property + Order of operations + disambiguation results in

6 + 6 + (6 x 6 x 0)

PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> 6 + 6 + 6 * 6 * 0
12

Python, C++, Java, C# - all yield the same result.

you could sort-of ignore OOO if the equation were re-written and evaluated left to right as

6 * 6 * 0 + 6 + 6

Without understanding the commutative property, you would end up with 2 different and "correct" answers.

But the commutative declares that 6 + 6 + 6 * 6 * 0 = 6 * 6 * 0 + 6 + 6. If we didn't have that property, computer programming would not work because math wouldn't work.

What the fk are you talking about....and in which language?....:E Confused::E Huh::E Loopy::E Head Scratch:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
64,638
Messages
1,423,406
Members
131,458
Latest member
NRLDominic
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Hi, I’m Mukesh, the creator of TimeCalculatorX.com — a simple and helpful resource for time calculation tools. I love building easy-to-use calculators related to hours, minutes, dates, countdowns, and everyday time conversions. https://timecalculatorx.com/
bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
thanks for your reply bob , is it feasible to build a 444 on a P14/M17 , or is the no4 enfield easier to build? i know where i can buy a lothar walther barrel in 44, 1-38 twist , but i think with a barrel crown of .650" the profile is too light .
Duke1966 wrote on Flanders357's profile.
ok $120 plus shipping
teklanika_ray wrote on MShort's profile.
I have quite a bit of 458 win mag brass, most of it new. How much are you looking for?

Ray H
bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
hey bob , new on here. i specifically joined to enquire about a 444 you built on a Enfield 4-1 you built . who did the barrel and what was the twist and profile specs ? look foward to your reply . cheers
 
Top