on a lighter note...

489815170_10233024957399226_6708263921173484869_n.jpg
 
1744392598127.png
 
1744392723710.png
 
IMG_1507.jpeg
 
They're both wrong - the answer is 12.

The commutative property + Order of operations + disambiguation results in

6 + 6 + (6 x 6 x 0)

PS C:\WINDOWS\system32> 6 + 6 + 6 * 6 * 0
12

Python, C++, Java, C# - all yield the same result.

you could sort-of ignore OOO if the equation were re-written and evaluated left to right as

6 * 6 * 0 + 6 + 6

Without understanding the commutative property, you would end up with 2 different and "correct" answers.

But the commutative declares that 6 + 6 + 6 * 6 * 0 = 6 * 6 * 0 + 6 + 6. If we didn't have that property, computer programming would not work because math wouldn't work.

What the fk are you talking about....and in which language?....:E Confused::E Huh::E Loopy::E Head Scratch:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
66,665
Messages
1,475,676
Members
141,693
Latest member
GitaCathca
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

I have 20 rounds of 416 Hoffman 400gn solids if anyone is interested
7x57Joe wrote on HunterX's profile.
How much is your friend asking for his M-S 8x56? Thanks
David jr wrote on Green Chile's profile.
Hello I am wanting the same thing done on a elephant in 2027 please keep me informed on how it is going
Is the 6 panels the whole elephant of just half
David Williams
Shotgun Coach wrote on Tdruck's profile.
In the RSA
 
Top