skydiver386
AH legend
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2023
- Messages
- 2,375
- Reaction score
- 9,683
- Media
- 30
- Member of
- SCI, NAHC
- Hunted
- South Africa, Ohio, Florida, Wyoming, Arizona
You are welcome to your opinion, and I have mine.There is a lot of condescending on this site. Only those who hunt "wild" Africa with double rifles while wearing thousand dollar felt hats and Rolex watches can speak with any authority. Or at least they think so. Their "big shot disease" seems to be endemic to a certain geographical area in the US, but has spread to a worldwide pandemic. Thankfully my dad, who was raised in the Depression hunting rabbits and bullfrogs to feed the family, vaccinated me early on. "Confirmation bias" is an obvious symptom.
As to shooting through a collection of thumper guns to see which is the biggest the shooter can handle: that's baloney. Just another big shot "bigger-is-best" symptom manifestation. I shot my first buffalo with a lowly 375 H&H plain-jane bolt rifle. One shot through the heart and it was done. And I had previously shot that rifle just once at the range earlier that day. Never fired a thumper gun before that (except one novelty shot with 500 Nitro as a teenager). I killed my second buffalo with the same rental rifle, again with just one shot to check zero before hunting. Put two shots into him but the first was mortal. Know how to shoot ... in the field. I think that is more important than what you shoot. Or how much you can spend. I'm confident my "homemade" 404J could kill an elephant if I wanted it to ... because I know how to shoot (note that I did not say "know how to shoot it"). 404J is certified legal for dangerous game by authorities who know more about killing those animals than I ever will. That's good enough for me. I don't need to waste a lot of money and my fragile retinas blasting away a truckload of different guns to determine my threshold for pain. Yes, some people need to see how big they can grow. That's their hobby and they enjoy it. Yay for them. Just don't criticize others who don't share the same passion.
There was nothing condescending in any post on this thread. Certainly not mine. I've never made over $50,000 in one year, I don't own a Rolex and I don't shoot a double rifle, but on the other hand I don't look down on those that do.
Nobody on this thread has criticized your rifle, or your choice of the 404.
I've offered several times to let others shoot my rifles, and somehow you think this is an egotistical manifestation of "Big Shot Disease"?
My girlfriend Tina has fired my 450 Rigby with Grizzly Ammunition factory loads of the 450gr Barnes TSX at 2450 fps. She said she actually prefers the 450 over the lighter 375 rifle, and these are her words not mine. She's an average woman in her mid 60's, and only started shooting in the last few years. If she can handle such a rifle, I'd bet most average men in good shape could do the same.
As for on target performance of the larger 416, 458, and 505 calibers, nearly every experienced PH will tell you the same thing. With an identically placed shot, the more powerful calibers have a noticably greater effect, and leads to quicker death and minimal suffering. On backing shots on elephant, the larger calibers are the better choice, as you may only have a shot at the hips from an odd angle as the Elephant is running away. The 375 is marginal in this situation, and that has been clearly stated by some of the most experienced men in Africa.
In his book The Perfect Shot, Kevin Robertson explains that the larger calibers are more effective than the smaller ones, IF THE SHOOTER CAN HANDLE THEM. He repeats this several times in nearly every chapter of his book. Craig Bodington has said the same thing, that there is a noticeable and undeniable difference between the 9.3/375's, the 416's, the 458's, and up, BUT ONLY IF THE SHOOTER CAN HANDLE THEM.
I can easily handle the more powerful 458's, so why do you criticize me?