375 HH double question

mms45

AH veteran
Joined
Feb 17, 2021
Messages
109
Reaction score
192
why if 375 HH is considered bad for a double do you see so many out there. It seems like at this point it might actually be one of the most prevalent double rifle calibers ever chambered. You see it from the top makers HH, Purdey, heym ect you see it in English guns, German, and Austrian . It spans from old guns all the way up to new guns in all categories from 11k chapuis to 250k best sidelock. Is the 375 hh rimless problem overblown? is the difference in pressure a real issue?

Or is it more of a " this could be and issue" therefore the internet has been deemed wrong?

I seem to recall the chapuis rep on here posting in the big iphisi thread that they have never had a 375hh returned for an issue.
 
it's not so much rimless are 'Bad' for a double. or not functional.
The timeless Rimmed version with its simplicity are desirable, traditional, peerless, unsurpassable and perfect. nothing more nothing less.
 
I also don’t know that the 375HH was “actually be one of the most prevalent double rifle calibers ever chambered.” I’d bet not…but it is one most often seen in today’s market, in part because they seem to languish unsold while proper rimmed cartridges from similar makers pop up and sell more quickly.

The rimless requires additional, small, moving parts and ones that historically were prone to premature wear and require attention/replacement. That doesn’t mean that the rifle will absolutely fail, and may not even ever require attention at all, but it is an unnecessary failure point that is dispensed with altogether if using a rimmed cartridge.

Having a 375 Flanged Mag I can say it’s awesome.
 
Good point maybe it’s the same rifles sitting but man sure seems to be a lot of them.
 
I'm not a fan of rimless catridges to be used in doubles or any other break-downs and would not buy one. However, there is one good point to use a rimless .375 in a double and that's good availability of ammo in Africa.
 
Good point maybe it’s the same rifles sitting but man sure seems to be a lot of them.
As much as I love the 375 Flanged Mag and prefer against the rimless H&H version, the one wonderful thing about the less favored H&H version is at times you can get a true deal on one, maybe step into a rifle you’d never want to pay for if it were in a proper double cartridge.

Heyms are a good example, where you’d see the H&H versions come up and languish at 30-50% the price of a 450/400 or 470. I’ve seen a couple Holland and Holland Royals in 375 H&H at nice discounts and makes me pause and think. Just like odd-ball cartridges by today’s ammo/brass availability, there are potential headaches, but discounts on the flip side as well. BUT…you have the expect the same if you ever decide to part with the rifle yourself. Expect it to take additional time and discount to move it.
 
As much as I love the 375 Flanged Mag and prefer against the rimless H&H version, the one wonderful thing about the less favored H&H version is at times you can get a true deal on one, maybe step into a rifle you’d never want to pay for if it were in a proper double cartridge.

Heyms are a good example, where you’d see the H&H versions come up and languish at 30-50% the price of a 450/400 or 470. I’ve seen a couple Holland and Holland Royals in 375 H&H at nice discounts and makes me pause and think. Just like odd-ball cartridges by today’s ammo/brass availability, there are potential headaches, but discounts on the flip side as well. BUT…you have the expect the same if you ever decide to part with the rifle yourself. Expect it to take additional time and discount to move it.
Honestly that is what’s made me ask the question there are some truly nice rifles I would never be able to afford in 470 ect….. but 375 puts it in the realm of possibilities
 
I’m not sure there are too many highly discounted good H&H 375 flanged magnum Royal double rifles getting around . The cartridge is superb with the 300 grain pill . And the Royal is a wonderful rifle . I use mine regularly and it works wonderfully well on buffalo . Every bit as good as my 375 H&H belted rimless magnum bolt action . Great cartridge and a great rifle .
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4232.jpeg
    IMG_4232.jpeg
    4.9 MB · Views: 17
I’m not sure there are too many highly discounted good H&H 375 flanged magnum Royal double rifles getting around . The cartridge is superb with the 300 grain pill . And the Royal is a wonderful rifle . I use mine regularly and it works wonderfully well on buffalo . Every bit as good as my 375 H&H belted rimless magnum bolt action . Great cartridge and a great rifle .
Beautiful rifle! From what I see the flanged goes for 15-20k more than the HH
 
why if 375 HH is considered bad for a double do you see so many out there. It seems like at this point it might actually be one of the most prevalent double rifle calibers ever chambered. You see it from the top makers HH, Purdey, heym ect you see it in English guns, German, and Austrian . It spans from old guns all the way up to new guns in all categories from 11k chapuis to 250k best sidelock. Is the 375 hh rimless problem overblown? is the difference in pressure a real issue?

Or is it more of a " this could be and issue" therefore the internet has been deemed wrong?

I seem to recall the chapuis rep on here posting in the big iphisi thread that they have never had a 375hh returned for an issue.

While rimless, high pressure cartridges like the 375 H&H Magnum (rimless) are better suited for a bolt action, there are certainly plenty of double rifles chambered for it. The factors that make these not ideal include,
  • Bolt Thrust - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolt_thrust
    • Simply Bolt Thrust is calculated by the cross sectional area of the largest point of the interior of the cartridge case, multiplied by the maximum (peak) chamber pressure of the cartridge.
  • Peak Pressure:
    • 375 H&H Rimless has a Maximum Pressure of 62,000 psi
    • Rimless cartridges such as the 375 Rimless operate at around 40,000 psi
  • Clearly at 50% more pressure each and every shot, rimless break action rifles will become loose much sooner than their rimless cousins. It’s that simple.
  • Pawl extractors – The spring loaded mechanical tabs that extend into the rim of rimless cases to provide the means of extraction are named “pawls”.
    • My Heym .458 Win (rimless) has two per extractor and at least once ripped the rim off a stuck case.
    • I’ve owned Merkel and Chapuis doubles that functioned with one pawl per extractor. I never shot those rifles enough to wear out those mechanisms.
Bonus: Diggory Hadoke on 375 Rimless, https://www.vintageguns.co.uk/magazine/the-375-flanged-double

How long will a high pressure, rimless double rifle last before it needs a repair? Let’s think about this.
  • Good quality bolt action rifles which are properly cleaned can last 5,000 rounds before the throat of the rifling is worn out, contributing to loss of accuracy.
    • In most cases, the actions will be almost as good as new! Just re-barrel, or set the barrel back by taking off in in at the breech and muzzle, and rechambering and re-threading. This would be fiscally impossible for a break action double rifle!
    • Note: Magnum cartridges with excessive powder for the size of the bore such as the .220 Swift, .264 Win Mag and others can “shoot out” their barrels in 1,000 rounds!
  • How many rounds do most shooter launch from their hunting rifles in a lifetime? Think about this.
    • Heavy recoiling rifles from 375 H&H and up do not get shot 1,000 in several decades.
    • Double rifles in 375 and larger probable get shot less than most bolt action rifles.
  • If any double rifle is shot enough to loosen the action, the rifle can be repaired can be repaired by a competent gunsmith, if you can find one! The process is to,
    • Remove the action hinge pin,
    • Machine a slightly larger diameter pin and insert into the action,
    • Mil the barrel hook to fit the new pin.
    • There is a lot of smoke blackening and hand filling to properly fit a new hinge pin to the barrel hook.
    • This is a common practice for 100+ year old vintage side by side shotguns.
If considering any rimless double, examine the action with a automotive feeler gage.
  • If the action can close on a .002” gage on the top and side interfaces of the barrel and breech, it has some wear but is serviceable (according to JJ Perodeau).
  • If an action cannot fully close on a .001” feeler gage, that rifle is barely broken in.
  • Warning: Once any SxS action has side to side wear as identified by a feeler gage, it will loosen faster due to side to side "hammering" generated by each shot!
A good quality 375 H&H double rifle while not ideal should give a caretaker much enjoyment before it needs a visit to a competent gunsmith. Could tightening an action change the rifle's regulation? In theory, yes! How much would it affect regulation? Perhaps a little.

The bottom line is there are many serviceable rimless doubles on the market. Their price should reflect they are not chambered in the more ideal, low pressure cartridges. How much of a price differential should there be? That’s a good question but a high quality rifle such as a Heym or better should fetch a higher percentage of price than middle grades such as Merkel. I’ve owned both… Finally, I would not touch a low quality double in any rimless chambering!

Personally, I've owned six double rifles and am down to only two. I need to let one go to its next "caretaker". I love my Heym 88B in .458 Win but also have strong affinity for high quality bolt action magazine dangerous game rifles.

As always, my babbling above is worth as much as you paid for it...
 
Last edited:
Good point maybe it’s the same rifles sitting but man sure seems to be a lot of them.

They seem everywhere because its the first "Africa Caliber" that comes to mind for a layperson. A person that purchases a double rifle without much knowledge tends to get one and the 375HH models are affordable, thus they buy them.

Then the buyer learns more and realizes they did not buy the right tool for the job. Experienced dangerous game hunters and experienced double rifle owners don't particularly care for the 375HH doubles so they languish on the market for a very long time.

A rimless cartridge requires an ejector mechanism to release the spent brass. Ejectors are a mechanical device that can and will fail. The small spurs on the ejector spur grabs the groove in the belt/rim and is a small protrusion. It is not that difficult to force a rimless cartridge past those spurs jamming the rifle. If you slam the rifle closed thereafter with force, you've broken the ejectors and perhaps gotten yourself killed by dangerous game.

When you do see 375HH doubles that are well regarded, they are a secondary barrel set that came WITH a 450,470, or 500NE double. Those 375HH barrels fit nicely on a large frame, large bore double rifle. The purpose of those 375HH barrels are for plains game without having to bring a second rifle on the hunt. In some cases, the biggest issue is limitation of how many rifles you can import for a hunt with many countries being limited to THREE. A two-barrel double rifle set opens up room for wives/children to have their rifles in the same case without going over the rifle limit.

But no, most people with knowledge do not want a rimless double rifle for dangerous game.
 
I was watching a video of Westley Richard rimless ejectors are very different than the Heym, Chapuis ones that are little paws. They were blades activated by the action not springs. And the rounds could drop into the chamber
 

Forum statistics

Threads
69,555
Messages
1,550,471
Members
162,636
Latest member
KathiJ3109
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Andrew NOLA wrote on Huntforever's profile.
Lbarr might be a scammer

it appears he sold the same brass to me and another member
Nomosendero wrote on gregrn43's profile.
Between Blak Rock and Pocahontas, I did not want to say that on the forum. That's a nice Cat!
curt672 wrote on WoodencrossIII's profile.
just making sure my message went threw
30-06Ken wrote on ftothfadd's profile.
I'll take the Vortex scope cover you have listed in the Pay it Forward thread.

Ken [redacted]
Scott CWO wrote on mark-hunter's profile.
Hi Mark. My email is [redacted]
 
Top