sestoppelman
AH ambassador
On that I agree if that was your point. The .35 "WHELEN" or .338-06 are great rounds, had both, but currently only the Whelen. But I have a Ruger 77 Win mag and a post 64 Win mag on the way, just snagged. I remember the first time I ever fired a Win mag. It was in Idaho with factory loads in a model 70 Win. It was illuminating! However compared to the .375 and up its a pussycat, especially if loaded down a tad. I like to shoot 200-225gr bullets in mine using R15 and similar powders for bench target practice.True but for all that extra 150fps to 200 FPS from mag recoil seems to jump a lot and become unpleasant to those who are recoil sensitive. There are more choices in bullets makers, weights than 35 Whalen when reloading, just giving options to think about.
OK guys, History and spelling lesson for the day. The .35 WHELEN was named for Col. Townsend WHELEN. Not WhAlen
and not WhelAn.


.....one day you will realise that the 9.3x62 is of course far superior......