THE KING

Gentlemen,

This is an example of a pressure curve.
Pressure builds and peaks as the bullet starts to move and then is swaged into the rifling. If you have ever tried to fit a bullet into the proper sized barrel you will very much appreciate that pressure swages a bullet into the rifling! That is where peak pressure is.
If you do not believe this just examine most any centerfire rifle barrel. Notice the thickness of the barrel surrounding the chamber?

A decade or so ago I used a Pressure Trace tool to develop loads. The results were similar to this example.

sampletrace1.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The above graph shows what I am discussing. the way to increase velocity without increasing the maximum pressure would be for the powder to be signed in such a way that the pressure peak shown at .5 then instead of dropping, the pressure could be maintained at the high level until1.0, then burnout and pressure drop to existing levels at 1.5. As long as the action/barrel has sufficient strength to handle the extended duration of pfressure, I'd expect significantly higher velocities.
 
I would say that the area underneath the curve is what is most important first. When you think about this for a bit, you’ll realize that peak pressure, provided it’s within a safe operating range, really doesn’t matter.

It’s the application of pressure in such a manner as it creates accelration of the bullet. This means in theory that one powder can have a lower pressure peak, but if the drop off of the pressure is slower, it may be more efficient in the end.

Looking at the graph above, I would tend to guess that the T4 powder and load would give best velocity. Not because it has a roughly 1% higher peak pressure than T2 or T3, or roughly even to T5, but because it maintains the overall pressure longer. This is another way of saying the area underneath the curve of the T4 powder looks to be the largest.

You can kind of compare this to a drag racing car that may come off the line a little slower than it’s competitor but maintains it’s accelelation down track longer and ultimately wins with a resulting overall faster track time.
 
I would say that the area underneath the curve is what is most important first. When you think about this for a bit, you’ll realize that peak pressure, provided it’s within a safe operating range, really doesn’t matter.

It’s the application of pressure in such a manner as it creates accelration of the bullet. This means in theory that one powder can have a lower pressure peak, but if the drop off of the pressure is slower, it may be more efficient in the end.

Looking at the graph above, I would tend to guess that the T4 powder and load would give best velocity. Not because it has a roughly 1% higher peak pressure than T2 or T3, or roughly even to T5, but because it maintains the overall pressure longer. This is another way of saying the area underneath the curve of the T4 powder looks to be the largest.

You can kind of compare this to a drag racing car that may come off the line a little slower than it’s competitor but maintains it’s accelelation down track longer and ultimately wins with a resulting overall faster track time.
@PHOENIX PHIL
Avery good analogy.. Peak pressure is no good unless it can be maintain a slower drop in pressure. If there's nothing left to burn pressures can't be maintained so speed can actually decrease. Look a a 22lr fired in a 16" barrel compared to a 24". Velocity is higher in the shorter barrel as all the powder has been consumed and pressure is still good. In a 24 inch barrelall the powder is consumed therefore the bullet is relying on what is left to exit the barrel. Extra time in the barrel is extra friction using up this pressure hence lower velocities.
If a powder can burn progressively and maintain the pressure curve in a flatter way instead of falling off sharply velocity has to increase. That's the beauty of some of these newer powders, they maintain the pressure curve for longer.
Bob
 
A decade or so ago I used a Pressure Trace tool to develop loads. The results were similar to this example.
Never heard of this. Very interesting.

Can you give more details how does it work?
Price?
Some photo?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.27 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.27 AM.png
    1,010.6 KB · Views: 92
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.29 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.29 AM.png
    1.8 MB · Views: 89
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.31 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.31 AM.png
    1 MB · Views: 96
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.32 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.32 AM.png
    551.7 KB · Views: 84
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.33 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.33 AM.png
    1 MB · Views: 94
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.34 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.34 AM.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 82
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.35 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.35 AM.png
    896.3 KB · Views: 90
  • Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.36 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-12-23 at 7.23.36 AM.png
    521.1 KB · Views: 88

Forum statistics

Threads
66,443
Messages
1,469,840
Members
140,814
Latest member
ToshaEhman
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

James Friedrichs wrote on Nicaburns's profile.
I really like that knife you're selling. It looks so similar to my original 1306 that has been around a long time. I can't spend that much but if you get to a point where you'd entertain offers let me know. Thx, James
Been away for a while, glad to be back
A Frame66 wrote on Marcus bock's profile.
Hi Marcus
I'll 2nd limcroma! Booked 2nd trip at SCI last week. Those guys are great. Trying to get hooked up with Peter when he gets to the states if I can break away.
roklok wrote on SkullKeeper's profile.
What sling studs do those swivels fit ? They look to be quite a bit wider than the standard modern swivels. They may be just what I need for my Remington 30 Express wide swivel studs. Can you measure the pin diameter ?
 
Top