Politics

I realize that about SS. I'd like to see it phased out as it stands now. The fact that the money is not invested in an account that each person pays into and stays in their name is the problem.

I hope the new Trump accounts are a start in the direction of privatization of SS accounts that GWB talked about.
My friend was a missionary to Chile. He said the peons down there have better retirement than the US average due to the fact that their retirement monies were privatized and the government could not rob it. The real problem is Congress is a professional thief, they rob SS, and get away with it.
 
Congress is a professional thief, they rob SS, and get away with it.
I recall when I was in college about 60 years ago, SSA had more money than any other federal agency. The administrators of SSA wanted a return on the money so it was loaned out to any agency that put their hand out. SSA funds were used to build bridges, pave highways, build buildings and all sort of social programs. In addition the scope of SSA was increased from the original Title 1, last I knew there were 9 Titles, all involving SSA funding some program. Combine not everyone paying back the SSA loan with politicians expanding places to spend the money and you have a recipe for Chapter 7.
 
Comparing me to Trump. Man, that was a low punch. Notice I didn't say "blow." You might get the wrong idea. Same geography though.
You delusional fool- No one is comparing you to Trump. the nearest person anyone would compare you to is your buddy from Mn, Timmy Walz.
 
Sadly, this thread gets into the gutter too often, and divides us as hunters. While it is often fascinating, the tone of some of the comments pull us away from the real purpose of this website.

It seems that believing in another’s right to free speech is easier than putting it into practice.
 
Last edited:
I recall when I was in college about 60 years ago, SSA had more money than any other federal agency. The administrators of SSA wanted a return on the money so it was loaned out to any agency that put their hand out. SSA funds were used to build bridges, pave highways, build buildings and all sort of social programs. In addition the scope of SSA was increased from the original Title 1, last I knew there were 9 Titles, all involving SSA funding some program. Combine not everyone paying back the SSA loan with politicians expanding places to spend the money and you have a recipe for Chapter 7.
All of those monies were returned to SS.

The issue is it isn’t a savings account. It had a surplus when boomers were in peak earning years because there were so many of them relative to the bomber if recipients. Now they are recipients and Gen X is in peak earning years but there are very few of us.

It’s all about demographics. Social security is a tax where current payors fund current recipients. There is no lockbox or savings plan.
 
You delusional fool- No one is comparing you to Trump. the nearest person anyone would compare you to is your buddy from Mn, Timmy Walz.
@Ray B, As you all know throwing insults is not how we go about having a discussion here, please refrain from name calling, you can get your message across without it. The use of offensive names and inflammatory language will not be tolerated. This is a friendly community based on mutual respect. Thank you.
 
And his head just keeps getting fatter. Flaunting the law to magnify himself even more. What a nut.


Actually I like this one. I'm gonna buy a roll of Trump $1 coins before they become illegal. I'll tack them all up downrange and shoot each one with .22. Then mount and frame the coins with a brass plaque commemorating the day I shot twenty bucks in one afternoon. :D :D :D
Do you scour the internet looking for news about Trump that you can rage about? There are a lot of better things to be obsessed about. Heck, if nothing works, try porn, instead of adding to your stress it might relieve it. :unsure:
 
AI is your friend.

"The 2009 Norwegian Nobel Committee specifically cited [Obama's] promotion of nuclear non-proliferation and his work in fostering a "new climate" in international relations, especially outreach to the Muslim world. Awarded just months into his first presidential term, the decision sparked considerable debate and surprise. Obama himself acknowledged that he did not feel he deserved the honor at that early stage, accepting it instead as a "call to action" for world leaders."

No doubt in 2099 the world community was expecting more from Obama than he might be able to deliver ... no doubt simply because he was black. I related in another thread how I vetoed proposed exhibitry text at Yosemite also in 2009 that credited Obama with uniting a divided nation like Lincoln. Besides being a totally nutty comparison on both ends, there was no evidence Obama at that early stage could unite a divided nation. My superior debated it with me (politically inspired by financial donations to pay for exhibitry). I told her from what little I knew about the man it was unlikely he would approve of taking credit for something he had not yet accomplished. "Well, I guess we can see what he says?" That ended the discussion and I was authorized to rewrite the text. Unlike Trump, Obama had integrity. Anyone attempting to argue for Trump's personal integrity has lost touch with reality. Guess we can ask Stormy Daniels? :D
Like I said, he did absolutely nothing to get the Nobel Peace Prize, except being Black which he isn't really; he's mulatto and that feat was really accomplished by his parents.
 
Like I said, he did absolutely nothing to get the Nobel Peace Prize, except being Black which he isn't really; he's mulatto and that feat was really accomplished by his parents.
He acknowledged it was a boff on the part of the Committee which I'm sure was something of an embarrassment for them. Then Trump gets mad because they won't make the same mistake twice. Pathetic.

I don't know of any mulatto persons who don't consider themselves Black.

@Tanks, I don't have to scour the internet. Anyone who checks the news can see Trump's goofy nonsense in the headlines pretty much every day.
 
Seeing that you are "up with the news/times" I'd have thought you'd know that term for biracial people is outdated and offensive.
My point exactly. Thought I made that clear enough. Not sure how you made exactly the opposite interpretation. Read the post I was responding to.
 
Feinstein much?
Oh and FYI @Scott CWO ..... Were you aware that the care taker who had power of attorney for Feinstein was in fact Nancy Pelosi's daughter in law?

Feinstein was the saddest case of elder abuse we've seen play out publicly; but I had ZERO sympathy for her because her own greed for power put her in the position to be used by her own ilk for YEARS.....

This had been blatantly obvious for YEARS

It's not just the politicians, there are "educators" at the University I work for who are 80+ with fully funded pensions who simply refuse to leave; and I honestly believe it's because they won't let go of the ability to tell others what to do..... and yes they are long past being productive.

Same for Ginsburg; remember all the pissing and moaning that was done about Trump picking her replacement?...... She could have retired under Obama but that would mean releasing the golden cow of power.
 
Seeing that you are "up with the news/times" I'd have thought you'd know that term for biracial people is outdated and offensive.
Yup correct one is coloured ......well over here anyway....and Cape coloureds are very proud of the designation..check out the shit Tyla caused by saying when she got to usa she was Cape coloured........apparently doesn't go down well over there for some reason....but as I have said before...here you are black..white..coloured.... :E Shrug:
 
Oh and FYI @Scott CWO ..... Were you aware that the care taker who had power of attorney for Feinstein was in fact Nancy Pelosi's daughter in law?

Feinstein was the saddest case of elder abuse we've seen play out publicly; but I had ZERO sympathy for her because her own greed for power put her in the position to be used by her own ilk for YEARS.....

This had been blatantly obvious for YEARS

It's not just the politicians, there are "educators" at the University I work for who are 80+ with fully funded pensions who simply refuse to leave; and I honestly believe it's because they won't let go of the ability to tell others what to do..... and yes they are long past being productive.

Same for Ginsburg; remember all the pissing and moaning that was done about Trump picking her replacement?...... She could have retired under Obama but that would mean releasing the golden cow of power.
Yes and the same can be said of Biden and Dr. Jill not wanting to relinquish power.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
68,986
Messages
1,536,924
Members
159,024
Latest member
LKINichole
 

 

 
 
Top