Field28
AH fanatic
I've always heard that you can't polish a turd but you can paint one!
Let's throw some paint on the dung beetle and send it on its wayI've always heard that you can't polish a turd but you can paint one!
Even painted you can’t get the stink off it.I've always heard that you can't polish a turd but you can paint one!
I would say history is set in stone by the writer, for instance I was taught in grade school that Columbus discovered America, are you kidding me, 3 or 4 alternatives are AZTECS or any number of eastern tribes, or vikings . even the Mormon religion came up with American Indians are the so called lost tribes of Isreal, of course D N A disproves this empirically. the LOVELOCK cave in Nevada has artifacts dating to 2500b.c.. BY the way it is a good rabbit hole to GIANTS!As a similar giant anecdote, in South Charleston, WV there is a large mound near the city center. The Appalachians actual would have picnics on it and conduct horse races around the base of it. Eventually, an archeologist dug it up and sure enough, it was a burial mound of native Americans. The warriors were on the outside circle and the chief was in the center and he was very tall. (somewhere between 6'6" and 7'). The folklore got ahold of this and stated he was taller than that and his hair was red. I have no idea if his hair was intact, but of course any Native American decaying could have their necrotic hair oxidize to a red tint. Nonetheless, the locals believed that giant Vikings/Celts ruled the local tribes, exactly the kind of folklore early settlers would love to propagate.
As to the Smithsonian Giant conspiracy, it is my opinion that those spreading this myth were very fundamentalist Christian. (not in the good way) On the fringe of fundamentalism they believe that scientists are in league with Satan, trying to destroy evidence to support the Bible. This could be "Nephilim" giant bones or it could be Noah's Ark. The late 19th and early 20th century stories of a giant cover-up all had an angle of "repent, the Bible is true" and scientists don't want you to know the truth.
39Make that 38.
Doesn't take much courage to defend stolen land by doing war crimes with superior weapons.The Jews created a homeland among the refuse of fallen and retreating empires. Moreover, they have demonstrated the courage to defend what they created with their sacrifice and blood.
www.middleeasteye.net
Does make the Tariff look like a bit of a shakedown drill.View attachment 723368
thats a curious tweet... Im not sure the Koreans need our permission to build a nuke sub? its been a nuclear nation for several decades at this point and is actually one of the worlds most significant nuclear energy nations (26 substantially sized nuke power plants.. for a relatively small country in terms of land mass and population comparatively to nuke power generation..)..
Not that anything in the tweet is bad per se.. Im all for agreements to buy US products (O&G), additional revenue coming into the US ($350B in exchange for lowering tariffs - it would appear the tariff strategy is working out overall despite all of the gloom and doom the left was screaming about 10 months ago).. and I think if anyone is going to have a nuke sub, South Korea is who I'd choose to have it.. theyve been staunch allies for a long time.. their military is top notch.. they train hard, work hard, are very educated, etc and are fully capable of not just operating, but maintaining a nuke safely.. certainly much more capable than many other nuclear nations.. and its guaranteed that sub will be swimming around in waters monitoring both N Korea and China naval assets..
Just thought it interesting that Korea needs our permission.. Its not like we (or anyone else in the western world) is going to sanction them or otherwise attack them in any way for building one.. its clearly to our advantage that they build a lot of them..
This is interesting.View attachment 723368
thats a curious tweet... Im not sure the Koreans need our permission to build a nuke sub?
Does make the Tariff look like a bit of a shakedown drill.
Working for who?Theyve certainly been a bit sloppy with it all.. but all in all it appears to be working so far..
I absolutely get that. What I found amusing was the shakedown for an apparent 350 billion dollar cash settlement along with altered behavior. And let me guess, Frosty is using all caps and bold font to post AI derived talking points on Tariffs. I wonder if he is capable of participating in a logical discussion based upon his own experiences and education.I think thats what they were likely intended to be all along..
Push Canada, Europe, Asia, etc.. into renegotiation of trade agreements, etc.. and level the playing field a bit..
He and Bessent and Lutnick, et al are doing what C-suiters do (rather than politicians)... Creating leverage.. and then using that leverage to their advantage for future negotiations..
Theyve certainly been a bit sloppy with it all.. but all in all it appears to be working so far..
And we are part of the shakedown..........we get higher taxes........as it always goes with taxes.Does make the Tariff look like a bit of a shakedown drill.
I'd rather use and cite reliable current sources.I wonder if he is capable of participating in a logical discussion based upon his own experiences and education.
View attachment 723368
thats a curious tweet... Im not sure the Koreans need our permission to build a nuke sub? its been a nuclear nation for several decades at this point and is actually one of the worlds most significant nuclear energy nations (26 substantially sized nuke power plants.. for a relatively small country in terms of land mass and population comparatively to nuke power generation..)..
Not that anything in the tweet is bad per se.. Im all for agreements to buy US products (O&G), additional revenue coming into the US ($350B in exchange for lowering tariffs - it would appear the tariff strategy is working out overall despite all of the gloom and doom the left was screaming about 10 months ago).. and I think if anyone is going to have a nuke sub, South Korea is who I'd choose to have it.. theyve been staunch allies for a long time.. their military is top notch.. they train hard, work hard, are very educated, etc and are fully capable of not just operating, but maintaining a nuke safely.. certainly much more capable than many other nuclear nations.. and its guaranteed that sub will be swimming around in waters monitoring both N Korea and China naval assets..
Just thought it interesting that Korea needs our permission.. Its not like we (or anyone else in the western world) is going to sanction them or otherwise attack them in any way for building one.. its clearly to our advantage that they build a lot of them..