Again, I never said or encouraged anyone including myself to use a handgun as their #1 primary first option in stopping a charge, only as a backup in case the rifle malfunctions in some way.
I was asking to see if anyone had stopped a charge with one. The video above of Lynn Thompson stopping a charge from a water buffalo with a 454 Casull shows it can be done in an emergency situation and proves a powerful revolver can be effective if the rifle is compromised.
After 7-pages of kind replies to you, your responses indicate that you are advocating that large handguns are adequate as “stopping weapons”. Now, your responses communicate that you are shifting to better have a stopping handgun just in case one’s rifle fails. In North American bear country, if one is by themselves, that is good advice if hiking or fishing. If, however I was hunting in bear country with @Scott CWO ‘s Colorado Wilderness Outfitters, I’d first ask Scott or his PH’s if a hand cannon was necessary?
I have only been on five different safaris where I shot three buffalo, two lionesses, and a tuskless elephant. I also shot over a dozen head of plains game. At no time did I feel unsafe without a handgun to back up the 4000 to 5000 foot pounds of energy from my .375 or .458. Frankly, for elephant tracking, I carried 18 pounds of rifle, water, ammo, spare socks, moleskin and so on. Why would I possibly want to add another 4 pounds to that load? My very experiance PH Johnny Russell carried his .500 Jeffery. A .458 Win double rifle backed up by an expert with his .500 Jeffery seemed enough gun for me!
Many of the previous responders to your posts have shot ten times the dangerous game as I have. I haven't read on any of those experianced hunters agreeing that a hand cannon was a good idea when one has both a large rifle and a PH with the same or larger.
An honest sincere question here, why would you not want a backup sidearm on you just in case your primary rifle malfunctions? Is it due to weight or you just think handguns regardless of how powerful they are, are just useless?
For me, it is because my rifles are built to be bullet-proof. Operational Availability focused in this case on Reliability is paramount! Mean time between failure (MTBF) is measured in many thousands of rounds.
My Heym is, well it is a Heym, German engineering and production at its finest. It is also a double rifle, i.e. two separate rifles built around each other. My magazine rifles are not “off the shelf”. Even if they were, I’ve commented in older threads what to replace on factory Winchesters and have supplied M98 surplus magazine springs to friends and others. It doesn't take much money to increase the reliability of a M70 or CZ 550.
Last edited: