Letting some hot air out of Robert Ruark

Ruark, like Peter Capstick and Rider Haggard, is best remembered for his ability to evoke a magic Africa that perhaps has never actually existed.

Few writers are in person how they present themselves in print; Hemingway in particular comes to mind in this context. That’s what makes the very rare exceptions, like Jim Corbett, so special.
 
He was a writer who hunted, not a hunter who wrote. If he were the latter, we’d likely not remember his name.
Truth... most books by professional hunters are slop.
 
Keep in mind that when Ruark made his first trip to Africa, not many people knew very much about the continent. There were very few resources one could draw upon for guidance or advice. All things considered, he did well for a novice and his books became an inspiration for others to go experience safari firsthand.

How many of today’s African hunters would have even considered hunting in Africa if it wasn’t for the internet?

As to his Hero Worship of his first PH… It WAS Harry Selby, after all. ;)
Regarding the internet, I have wanted to hunt Africa since the mid 70's when I was 9. Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom with Marlon Perkins did it for me, did t have to wait for the internet to be invented. ;) There are surely many others on here that feel the same due to that show.
 
Regarding the internet, I have wanted to hunt Africa since the mid 70's when I was 9. Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom with Marlon Perkins did it for me, did t have to wait for the internet to be invented. ;) There are surely many others on here that feel the same due to that show.
I agree with that. I wanted to hunt Africa since long before the internet was accessible.

BUT the internet had made it much easier to access what’s available in Africa and to understand the opportunities and costs.
 
First, it was a different time. There’s a lot of modern judgement passed against people who are long gone and in no position to defend what they did and what they wrote.

Unfortunately it still isn’t so unusual to see relative hunting novices on safari. Most of them do their best and have a great experience.

The vast majority of all writers aren’t as interesting as their books. I once met one of my literary heroes and found out he was a pompous jerk.

I never met Rourke or Capstick, or Hemingway, but they knew how to write, and that kept the dream alive in me until I was in a position to go see for myself.

Do any of us have beautiful photos of gorgeous creatures we shot basically from the road with minimal effort? I much prefer “earning it” but I don’t pass up gifts and unusual opportunities either. Do we correct others when they wonder in amazement at the experience?
The value of Ruark is his opening up Africa to people who had never experienced it. His honesty in being a novice enderred him to people who lived the experience through his eyes. No one would ever say he was an expert but his gift to us which I experience every time I go is the magic of Africa versus our life in the US
 
I’ll also say his Africa writing is more meaningful to me because of his Old Man and the Boy. I read it every couple years and get something new every time. Not on Opening Day draws a tear every time.
 
I have no interest in picking a fight, but I will stand in defense of Ruark any day. I know there is a popular trend to tear down heroes (and statues, and those in the arena) but I find it boring and small and distasteful to do so. Get in the arena and show what you can do before you get on your high horse and try to take down someone who is in there.

It is not a story written for the September issue of an outdoor magazine. It is real safari literature, and it stands as such. Many serious commentators consider it to be the finest example of the genre.

I personally rate Horn of the Hunter > Green Hills precisely because he shows his warts and his flaws, and if you've ever tried to put a bit of yourself on a page and fling it into the void for all to see, you have some sense of how much courage that takes. It takes courage precisely because you will inevitably be attacked and critiqued by small persons who have never done it.

Hemingway is fabulous, and Green Hills is wonderful to read, but it's not even his best work (Big Two Hearted River has entered the chat). And Capstick, bless his heart, is just fun. And there's nothing wrong with fun. We don't always have to stick a pin in everything fun, you know.

As some have observed here, he was a writer who hunted, and who fell in love with hunting in Africa, and dedicated himself to it. Surely we here can all agree to admire that...
 
I love fun. I LOVE colorful writing, and Capstick drew me to Africa. All good fun. But if someone emulates you and goes off half cocked on a lion hunt not having fired the rifle in question....it will be a wonder if someone doesn't get eaten. Just saying.
Never said I didn't enjoy Ruark's wordsmanship. Not being small or distasteful, but not blind either. And I have been in the arena, 4 buffalo deep, anyway.

Everyone should read The Old Man and the Boy, IMO
 
I’ll also say his Africa writing is more meaningful to me because of his Old Man and the Boy. I read it every couple years and get something new every time. Not on Opening Day draws a tear every time.
The Old Man and the Boy is one of my very favorite books of all time. It reminds me so much of adventures with my grandfather.
 
He was a writer who hunted, not a hunter who wrote. If he were the latter, we’d likely not remember his name.
This pretty much sums it up completely.
 
Well, this will likely sling a skunk into the room, and not saying that Ruark did not exhibit a masterful use of the English language, but what I am suggesting is that he had not earned the right to the use of such language in Horn of the Hunter!
Just keepin' it real, as they say:
Ruark admits that he had never so much as fired a rifle, especially HIS rifles prior to the safari. Abomination!
He has zero grasp of the basics of marksmanship when firing upon his first animals, striking one antelope in the foot! Disrespectful of game.
His choice of a 220 swift is not explained, but he abandons it after seeing dismal results in blowing a ham off a warthog.
He gets talked into immediately going after a lion and "places the shot right behind the ear" a low odds horrible first shot choice, especially given the sloping skull, topped by hair.
He turns down a free leopard! (Should he have been properly prepared to hunt, this alone would constitute a reason to commit him to asylum)
He talks about how incompetent hunters place the PH at risk, while himself embodying said incompetent hunters.
He idol worships his PH as ALL first timers do when they come back as instant experts.
He proceeds to give us all sage advice, written like a thriller, while he is still wet behind the ears, and repeating good advice he's heard/just learned.
He describes armchair bullshit like facing buffalo stampedes by shooting one, then standing on it while the others stream by, really? (does he know just how rare an actual oncoming stampede is--not just the jostling forward to see whats of danger? Or how hard it is to instantly "drop" a buff?)

Entertaining reading, written about others level of experience/expertise which he adopted, as any learner should, but not authoritative. Colorful description of a beautiful land and experience which doubtlessly helped the safari industry then and now by evoking wonder and appreciation.
Still, beginner gushing, all dressed up. Your comments?
Great fiction.

For real hunting, read Hemingway. The Green Hills of Africa is a good start.
 
I much prefer Ruark to Hemingway, Hemingway gets a little wordy to me at times and with my pea brain the fewer words the better. With that said I still read Green Hills, Trie at First Light and some of his short stories yearly.
 
I love fun. I LOVE colorful writing, and Capstick drew me to Africa. All good fun. But if someone emulates you and goes off half cocked on a lion hunt not having fired the rifle in question....it will be a wonder if someone doesn't get eaten. Just saying.
Never said I didn't enjoy Ruark's wordsmanship. Not being small or distasteful, but not blind either. And I have been in the arena, 4 buffalo deep, anyway.

Everyone should read The Old Man and the Boy, IMO
No offense intended at all, my friend. I too love the Old Man and the Boy, and I think it's a masterclass in teaching a young person about guns and gun safety.

I was really speaking more about being in the arena of writing a novel, not hunting.

Cheers!
 
Great fiction.

For real hunting, read Hemingway. The Green Hills of Africa is a good start.
I believe Green Hills is as much fiction as anything Ruark wrote. They both killed the animals. They both took poetic license with the process.
 
To appreciate Hemingway you have to think in a different manner. I’ve enjoyed reading all mentioned- Hemingway, Capstick and Ruark. IMO Capstick viewed Hemingway as a mentor for his writing style and differed only by using a simpler story method. Hemingway was a master at using third person conversation to draw the reader in. It is a style some find too abstract. Those readers prefer simpler, paint by the numbers, styles. The simple, paint by the numbers style is what many PHs have used and it is why many readers soon tire of it. That style is usually easy to read and consumed, one and done, as a source of info. I can read something by Boddington and have no interest in reading it again and sometimes wonder why I read it in the first place, It gives basic facts but no flavor. I can read Hemingway and can hear, feel and smell the bush. I can read a work by Hemingway several times and still come away with added nuances I’d previously missed. As to the minutiae of slanted facts and details… doesn’t bother me too much. Writers must be allowed some artistic liberty, otherwise they’d just crank out compilations of facts drier than a popcorn fart.
 
Last edited:
To appreciate Hemingway you have to think in a different manner. I’ve enjoyed reading all mentioned- Hemingway, Capstick and Ruark. IMO Capstick viewed Hemingway as a mentor for his writing style and differed only by using a simpler story method. Hemingway was a master at using third person conversation to draw the reader in. It is a style some find too abstract. Those readers prefer simpler, paint by the numbers, styles. The simple, paint by the numbers style is what many PHs have used and it is why many readers soon tire of it. That style is usually easy to read and consumed, one and done, as a source of info. I can read something by Boddington and have no interest in reading it again and sometimes wonder why I read it in the first place, It gives basic facts but no flavor. I can read Hemingway and can hear, feel and smell the bush. I can read a work by Hemingway several times and still come away with added nuances I’d previously missed. As to the minutiae of slanted facts and details… doesn’t bother me too much. Writers must be allowed some artistic liberty, otherwise they’d just crank out compilations of facts drier than a popcorn fart.
Absolutely.

Hunter’s who write tell the story of the hunt. Writers who hunt, like Hemingway and Ruark, make you feel the hunt. You can feel the checkering of the rifle under your hands and the tightening of your chest and you prepare for the shot.

I think the finest bit of hunting writing Hemingway ever did is Remembering Shooting Flying: A Key West Letter. I read it every year the night before the dive opener. He captures the essence of wing shooting without actually describing any wing shooting. If you like bird hunting even a little bit it should speak to you.
 
The two best “client” works about the joy and wonder of hunting Africa for the first time are Hemingway’s “Green Hills of Africa” and Ruark’s “Horn of the Hunter.” Both were brilliant writers whose styles far lesser authors have attempted to copy for generations. What makes them particularly real is the willingness of both to tell their tales well and truly - whether Ruark’s marksmanship or Hemingway’s kudu fixation and trophy jealousy.

Capstick borrowed and embellished as do all authors while painting a brilliant testament to PHs everywhere.

None of the three were providing affidavits for court testimony.
 
Last edited:
I’ll add that Ruark, and for that matter Hemingway, wrote as professionals with an eye toward readability/sales. Thats how he made his living. If no one reads your books are you a writer? Certainly not a profitable one.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
68,823
Messages
1,532,238
Members
157,483
Latest member
ZackChrist
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Enjoying hunting in the Kalahari with good FREIND Brendan HTK safaris
Stnelson wrote on Never Been's profile.
I want one of the stocks.
buckstix wrote on 450 Dakota's profile.
SENT THIS PM YESTERDAY ..

I will take a set .. I would take more than one set if you have more.

BUCK STIX - [redacted]
 
Top