Thinking about getting an electronic powder measure/scale

Yep, that’s it. Here is a pic.

View attachment 522499

I’ve been reloading for just north of 45 years and still use some of my original equipment. I’m playing with some hyper-accurate toys, so I decided that it was time to upgrade in some key areas. Case prep and powder scales were the first on the list.

I refuse to use the new bullets designed to explode on impact, aka Berger, as I think that their approach to terminal ballistics is insane. Hence, I’ve been on the hunt for long range bullets with a better approach to terminal ballistics. The group above was shot with Nosler 6.5 mm, 142 gr AccuBond LRs. Unfortunately swift hasn’t gotten into the heavy for caliber bullets (a 6.5 mm, 145 gr Scirocco would be awesome!).

I have yet to loose any game to a Berger bullet. I understand you stance, just know many animals have fallen to them. Everyone has their own take on them. IMHO they work and the work well.
 
I have yet to loose any game to a Berger bullet. I understand you stance, just know many animals have fallen to them. Everyone has their own take on them. IMHO they work and the work well.

I’m glad they’re working for you. I’m old school. I want a bullet that holds together and drives through. To me, a bullet designed to fragment is waiting for one big bone to cause a very bad day.

For what it’s worth, a good friend is a leader in the long range game. We have a standing disagreement on terminal ballistics. He loves Bergers.
 
Seems to me that scale accuracy is less important than repeatability. If you find a charge of XX.XX grains of a specific powder gives you good results, it’s not really important if that charge is really XX.XX or a tad more or less. What is important is that the scale is consistent and you get the same weight reading every time.
 
Seems to me that scale accuracy is less important than repeatability. If you find a charge of XX.XX grains of a specific powder gives you good results, it’s not really important if that charge is really XX.XX or a tad more or less. What is important is that the scale is consistent and you get the same weight reading every time.

Agreed. This setup throws to +/- 2/100ths of a grain every time. Something I could never do with a balance beam or measure. It has shrunk my 100 yd groups on the 6.5 from sub 1/2” to one hole. I am getting 1/2” at 300 yards if wind is not a factor. This is a Coues rifle, so I have to realistically be prepared to shoot 550 to 600 in field conditions. I know this rig could hit a deer much further out, but that is of little interest to me. I want to be prepared for the max cross canyon shot, nothing more.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
64,649
Messages
1,423,561
Members
131,526
Latest member
BetseyDelF
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
thanks for your reply bob , is it feasible to build a 444 on a P14/M17 , or is the no4 enfield easier to build? i know where i can buy a lothar walther barrel in 44, 1-38 twist , but i think with a barrel crown of .650" the profile is too light .
Duke1966 wrote on Flanders357's profile.
ok $120 plus shipping
teklanika_ray wrote on MShort's profile.
I have quite a bit of 458 win mag brass, most of it new. How much are you looking for?

Ray H
bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
hey bob , new on here. i specifically joined to enquire about a 444 you built on a Enfield 4-1 you built . who did the barrel and what was the twist and profile specs ? look foward to your reply . cheers
 
Top