I'm afraid I have seen and have experienced Hunting Associations as basically self serving organisations with a limited range of benefits for members. The question I have is why wasn't PHASA aware of this guys modus operandi ? Is it an organisation where membership is automatic without checks or balances ? No organisation in any field of endeavour can be perfect but if the organisation has a code of conduct, ethics or stated goal, why don't they monitor it ? Did this member slip through the net or was a blind eye turned ? The more time I spend hunting the less trusting I become of organisations and the often necessary evil of paid access to hunt.