joker2400
AH veteran
I am looking at getting a new .375 H&H soon. Trying to keep my cost of rifle with optics under $5k. Does anybody have input in choosing between these 2 rifles? Are there any special considerations I should keep in mind?
I totally agree about the weight and balance of the 375 RSM. I knew this before getting one but was hooked on what to me is a classic Safari rifle. I ended up putting another $2k in custom work into it and ended up with a too heavy 375 that shoots like a dream.I am a Ruger fan, and have owned hundreds, including 14 or 15 RSM's, six of them in .375 H&H... having said that, I would buy the Caprivi... the RSM in .375 is one of my least favorite Ruger configurations... it is grossly muzzle heavy... I kept buy them, and kept selling them. On the other hand, I love my RSM in .458 Lott.
Classier? Well ok, Kimber is not as clunky but that's just wood; take that away and the Kimber is just another rifle. Nice functioning for sure (so I've heard) but the RSM, as heavy as it is. is just traditionally classy and a great shooter, but that's just my opinion.Ive owned both, the RSM is built like a tank and the Kimber is lighter with some nice features like glass bedding. You can't go wrong with either, if you prefer a bigger heavier rifle go with the RSM, if you prefer a rifle thats a little lighter and classier go with the Kimber.