REMINGTON 721 in .375 H&H MAGNUM

"but you and some others here are just jumping the gun to run your mouth instead of providing much of anything intelligent"

It's pretty clear if they provided anything intelligent it would be over your head anyway. :rolleyes:

View attachment 686283

It's absolutely clear youre just running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent.
 
Actually I'm "running" my fingers.

I will repeat - you're fond of that approach, right? - that intelligent responses would be wasted on you.

Sir, you have gone so far off the rails insulting knowledgeable, helpful people that I doubt anyone here will ever take you seriously again.
 
Actually I'm "running" my fingers.

I will repeat - you're fond of that approach, right? - that intelligent responses would be wasted on you.

Sir, you have gone so far off the rails insulting knowledgeable, helpful people that I doubt anyone here will ever take you seriously again.

and youre just running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent.
 
It’s very obvious that your gun has an aftermarket barrel. While the profile is likely very similar, and possibly identical, to the factory barrel, it is not a given that the factory sights that would have been intended for whatever year your particular rifle was made will work with the current barrel. In other words, all of the item numbers in the world are not gonna save you some proper gunsmithing.

One of the knowledgeable people who tried to help you before you pissed everyone off would have probably shared this nugget with you had you not been a thin skinned ass hat.

After reading this and your ill advised attempt to build a 416 on a Savage, I’d say you are simply out of your depth. You’re not playing in the sandbox that’s most appropriate for you. If you want to piss up a rope while marveling at your own brilliance go play on one of the many tactical forums.

And while I do run my mouth, go off half cocked, and constantly provide low intelligence commentary, I feel confident that none of these things mean whatever it is you think they mean. Your comments are the Internet forum equivalent of the shirtless drunk on Cops trying to use lawyer speak.

IMG_1657.jpeg
 
It’s very obvious that your gun has an aftermarket barrel. While the profile is likely very similar, and possibly identical, to the factory barrel, it is not a given that the factory sights that would have been intended for whatever year your particular rifle was made will work with the current barrel. In other words, all of the item numbers in the world are not gonna save you some proper gunsmithing.

One of the knowledgeable people who tried to help you before you pissed everyone off would have probably shared this nugget with you had you not been a thin skinned ass hat.

After reading this and your ill advised attempt to build a 416 on a Savage, I’d say you are simply out of your depth. You’re not playing in the sandbox that’s most appropriate for you. If you want to piss up a rope while marveling at your own brilliance go play on one of the many tactical forums.

And while I do run my mouth, go off half cocked, and constantly provide low intelligence commentary, I feel confident that none of these things mean whatever it is you think they mean. Your comments are the Internet forum equivalent of the shirtless drunk on Cops trying to use lawyer speak.

View attachment 686301
Finally got the correct answer you are looking for! , it’s a modified version of a model 721 , with zero input on whether it was drilled and taped correctly to accommodate a set of OEM open sights, or aftermarket for that matter, it is too bad it’s not a model 725 which is a rare beast but did come set up with proper sights for the 375 & 458
Sell it and the savage Frankenstein and buy a properly built for hunting rifle
Or use them as trot line weights, but showing your ass to strangers trying to help you out but being the definition of gauche and Glib (a person with little knowledge of a subject that another person greatly understands) is incredibly difficult to get around
Mayhem strong drink his ruined your ability to be rationally balanced?
 
It’s very obvious that your gun has an aftermarket barrel. While the profile is likely very similar, and possibly identical, to the factory barrel, it is not a given that the factory sights that would have been intended for whatever year your particular rifle was made will work with the current barrel. In other words, all of the item numbers in the world are not gonna save you some proper gunsmithing.

One of the knowledgeable people who tried to help you before you pissed everyone off would have probably shared this nugget with you had you not been a thin skinned ass hat.

After reading this and your ill advised attempt to build a 416 on a Savage, I’d say you are simply out of your depth. You’re not playing in the sandbox that’s most appropriate for you. If you want to piss up a rope while marveling at your own brilliance go play on one of the many tactical forums.

And while I do run my mouth, go off half cocked, and constantly provide low intelligence commentary, I feel confident that none of these things mean whatever it is you think they mean. Your comments are the Internet forum equivalent of the shirtless drunk on Cops trying to use lawyer speak.

View attachment 686301

Yeah youre just spewing diarrhea out your mouth.
You show very little understanding of the relation between the barrel contour and the style of sight used, and youre another lame captain obvious due to your inablity to do your responsibility of actually reading a person's first entry to their post, or its a matter of your sad inablity to have paid attention while reading it.

You said
Quote
It’s very obvious that your gun has an aftermarket barrel.
End Quote

Well, yeah of coarse its VERY obvious that my gun has an aftermarket barrel ESPECIALLY since I said right at the very start of this post in BOLD capital letters in its own separated paragraph
Quote
NOTE:
Right, the barrel is not original to the gun.
The barrel is stamped with "APEX MATCH GRADE"
This would have replaced the original Remington barrel upon the gun being converted to the .375 H&H Mag.
End Quote

You said
Quote
all of the item numbers in the world are not gonna save you some proper gunsmithing.
End Quote

I'm not new to doing skilled work on guns, I never said or implied I wouldn't need to do any type of gunsmithing, and it's mentioned in a few places in my 416 Rem Mag post that you viewed, whereby my dad has been a machinist for nearly 50 years. Nearly 50 years and still working at a factory where they produce titanium for companies such as Boeing, and so its obviously not uncommon for us to drill and tap holes for scope mounts and sights.
In the event I would have to machine a dovetail for a particular sight, that also wouldn't be out of the possibilities by any means.

Now when it comes to the situation of you expressing there is the possibility for the original sights not going to provide proper use on a replacement barrel even when that barrel is identical,
You said
Quote
While the profile is possibly identical to the factory barrel, it is not a given that the factory sights that would have been intended for whatever year your particular rifle was made will work with the current barrel.
End Quote

I could only laugh at how big your brain fart had to of been when you brewed that one up lol.
Of the two different sights I found so far, that was used on the 721, they're the common flexible open sights
(one of these sights was mounted whereby fitting into a dovetail that's machined into the barrel, and the other sight has a base mount whereby is first attached to the barrel)
but anyways, when the contour of the original barrels are identical to the contour of the replacement barrel, these factory sights will OBVIOUSLY work fine, ya eager doofus,
and these flexible sights will almost certainly work fine whereby having plenty adjustment to even accommodate in the situation if there being small differences from one barrel to another.

Remington even made a couple different sized stepped bridges used to elevate the open sight whereby one provides higher lift than the other.
When either one of those stepped bridges should somehow be inefficient, its not difficult to buy an aftermarket stepped bridge that would be adequate for the application and by doing so it wouldn't even hurt any originality of its appearance

And it was seriously deranged of you to make the claim that I'm out of my depth as well as the other lame jargon you contrived.
Listen up, Nimrod
I built a Savage 416 Rem Mag from the ground up with no personal experience with Savage actions and therefore for me was an interesting and fun challenge, but the many idiots that troll here and who didnt have any personal experience with Savage 110 LA bolts was merely repeating what they heard through rumors whereby saying the equivalent of Savage being junk or otherwise ridiculous for anyone to be using for their gun build.
This Savage 416 Rem Mag turned out QUITE NICE even though small adjustments are still in progress to the magazine's feed lips to help when there's more than one cartridge in the magazine,
AND I did this custom build for approximately 800.00 less than the average cost of the common 416 Rem Mag rifles being sold

With all that combined, youre just exposing how you shoved your head up your rear end while attempting to act like youre anything more than that hipster doofus which you expose so well
 
Last edited:
Yeah its often times all that can be said to trolls like you or anyone else going to continue running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent
Hey guys 7m is that a record? Glad I could waste his time!
 
Why dont you run along and ask your local gunsmith as you have said he knows more than we do!
 
Why dont you run along and ask your local gunsmith as you have said he knows more than we do!

Yeah you're another trolls on here who continues running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent
 
Last edited:
You're obviously not the sharpest but the dullest knife in the drawer.

It's already been explained how there is more than one style of sight that was used on the 721 during its many years of production, but your brain farts prevent you from reading or paying attention to what you read in order to prevent yourself from blabbering nonsense.

Remington, and not uncommon for other companies as well, didnt always print a new manual for just the sake of one part like a sight that was change over the years,
and so just because you see one sight in a manual, obviously doesnt mean its the only sight that was produced for it,
but you and some others here are just jumping the gun to run your mouth instead of providing much of anything intelligent
there were two sights used, the early ones and the later ones, you just want some one else to do the work finding them,, sounds like some one is just lazy. and it looks like some of the dull knifes in the drawer are sharper than you. i,ll bet you can,t even tie your own shoes. now please go play in the sand box with the rest of the children.
 
This is a fascinating thread whereby I feel I’ve fallen though a looking glass. A member of the forum asks a question about his rifle but also mentions his experience shooting it whereby some members respond with commentary about his experience as well as comments about the question about sight whereby engaging in discussion as appropriate on a discussion forum. The original poster takes offense whereby he attacks those who are responding to his post. It appears that the only acceptable response would have been to post nothing but the exact part number and probably a source for purchase.

If the forum operated as the optional poster seems to prefer it would be quite boring whereby it would likely perish. I myself prefer one where ideas can be exchanged freely even if slightly off topic whereby we can all exchange information and possibly increase our general knowledge.
 
there were two sights used, the early ones and the later ones, you just want some one else to do the work finding them,, sounds like some one is just lazy. and it looks like some of the dull knifes in the drawer are sharper than you. i,ll bet you can,t even tie your own shoes. now please go play in the sand box with the rest of the children.
youre still running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent.
 
Pardon my interruption, but I think you're going the wrong direction in pursuing open sights. Just forget the sights, and pony up a few more bucks for a Nikko Stirling 5-25x50 scope for precision shooting off that back porch. Mount it with the highest rings that you can find. If you're worried about the scope hitting your eye, then follow that suggestion to get a PAST recoil pad; but glue it to the back of the scope, and cut a hole you can see through.
 
This is a fascinating thread whereby I feel I’ve fallen though a looking glass. A member of the forum asks a question about his rifle but also mentions his experience shooting it whereby some members respond with commentary about his experience as well as comments about the question about sight whereby engaging in discussion as appropriate on a discussion forum. The original poster takes offense whereby he attacks those who are responding to his post. It appears that the only acceptable response would have been to post nothing but the exact part number and probably a source for purchase.

If the forum operated as the optional poster seems to prefer it would be quite boring whereby it would likely perish. I myself prefer one where ideas can be exchanged freely even if slightly off topic whereby we can all exchange information and possibly increase our general knowledge.

Youre still manipulating the actuality in attempt to continue running your mouth instead of providing anything intelligent
 
Pardon my interruption, but I think you're going the wrong direction in pursuing open sights. Just forget the sights, and pony up a few more bucks for a Nikko Stirling 5-25x50 scope for precision shooting off that back porch. Mount it with the highest rings that you can find. If you're worried about the scope hitting your eye, then follow that suggestion to get a PAST recoil pad; but glue it to the back of the scope, and cut a hole you can see through.

Please go actually do your responsibility to at least read a person's first post but yet paying attention to any direct point they made instead of you merely throwing out stuff that obviously does nothing to legitimately help provide the actual information which I clearly said came here to get.

I clearly said
Quote
It does have scope mounts on it but I'm not wanting to spend extra money for a scope
End Quote

Through the post, I also said how I have no need for a scope when this gun will be used for shooting within 150 feet.
Again, the iron sights are what I specifically chose and for good reason. I dont need anyone trying to convince me of anything that I already made clear is something I'm not interesting in doing
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,036
Messages
1,333,790
Members
113,988
Latest member
Gabriel Mason
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Just did a podcast, check it out if interested!

Cowboybart wrote on Yukontom's profile.
I read an older thread that mentioned you having some 9.3x64 brass. Do you still have some? I am looking for 100 pcs, maybe 200.
 
Top