So all academic papers cannot be trusted because one paper sensationalizes something? I guess if sensationalism is no longer allowed, I suppose FoxNews, OAN, NewsMax, and the WSJ are all out of business then.
So domestic terrorism charges and 50 years in prison for people who played with fireworks, but little jail time and a presidential pardon for the Jan 6th domestic terrorists. Rules for thee but not for me it sounds like.
Big Easy, the leftist spin doctor.
By playing with fireworks you mean when they fired rifles at police?
Indeed, I’m trying to figure out what height someone had to have hit their head from to dismiss what these terrorists did as just playing with fireworks when an ICE agent was shot with an AR-15.
Well clearly reading isn't high on your to-do lists. "They" didn't fire "rifles". One man fired his rifle, his name was Benjamin Hanil Song. The three defendants I'm referring to left before the local deputies arrived, and the shooting incident occurred. Several of the convicted were done so because they were allegedly "Providing support to terrorists, a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2339A" Even though their "support" consisted of an office printer to print anti-government, anti-police literature, and a left-wing book club...I thought free speech was important to you all? Guess not.
Once again, reading isn't for you. The guy that got shot wasn't even an ICE agent, it was a local deputy responding to the initial disturbance call. I seem to remember a lot of explosions on Jan 6th, but I'm sure you're not biased at all and demanded that every one of those domestic terrorists "swing" as well right...right? Even though some of them didn't commit acts of violence and had already left earlier in the day...right?
Yeah, and the fireworks were an attempt to draw more officers out of the building to create more casualties!
Remember when Obama was running for office and people tried to tie Obama to the bombing terrorist Bill Ayers. It was called dangerous, mistruths etc.
Thank you for that Red Herring, it was very nice.
I doubt America has that much time left. By 2076 this country will already be bankrupted by Republican tax cuts for the rich. And if we keep up our anti-immigrant rhetoric, our population and economies will be in severe decline as well.
Maybe but remember the socialist have been in America since the late 1870’s and they had a bigger presence in America and England post wwi up till ww2. FDR had a bigger impact on socialism taking hold with ironically many of the institutions that the older generations benefit from or fight to keep. If we fall it will be from importing to many people with conflicting values in a time where they are not necessarily for the betterment of the nation. And from a population who has been to indoctrinated to stand up against a government that inflated there currency into oblivion and refused to get rid of over burden and unaffordable social programs
I understand the concept of a consumer economy and the need to expand consumption through population. But how do we reconcile tech saying most jobs will be obsolete in the near future so we will have a massive surplus of labor with politicians fighting to bring in millions more to devalue the jobs that supposed will still exist?
