Politics

[mdwest]

I normally just scroll past his posts. I will try to do so in the future. It’s difficult to leave an inane comment unchallenged.

lol … I lack the ability to walk past the village idiot and not engage… call it a character flaw…

Unless I want to spend the entire afternoon on AH, I have to maintain a fairly robust ignore list lol…

 

[Newboomer]

lol … I lack the ability to walk past the village idiot and not engage… call it a character flaw…

Unless I want to spend the entire afternoon on AH, I have to maintain a fairly robust ignore list lol…

Yes, it is astounding the iinfinitesimal cranial acuity some self proclaimed experts display. A wise man once said that when those types open their mouths their guts fall out.

 

[Big_Easy]

You don’t deserve an answer, but you might want to check into who a case has to be heard by, hint, it’s not in the administration.

You can't even see past your own delusions. Trump told his own IRS appointees to settle his case with him because he knew that a judge and a jury wouldn't look too favorably on this nonsense. Go read one of the statues that he was suing under: 26 U.S. Code § 7431. Last time I checked Charles Littlejohn was not an officer, nor an employee of of the United States, he was a contractor. It also has a 2 year statue of limitations to sue the government, which Trump missed. That's why none of the other rich guys are suing, they know how unlikely they are to prevail in a court, and they're past the time limit anyways.

Sorry @mdwest there's no blood in the water, no sharks, and no precedent to be set, just more typical Trump corruption. And even if by some miracle Trump did win, that same statue lays out damages; actual damages suffered by the plaintiff, punitive damages, and attorneys fees. One would find it difficult to list any real, actual damages since he was relected president, and his financial position increased significantly after their release. I mean, he can't claim his reputation was harmed either, because the public already knows he's a rapist and a cho-mo. So what actual damages did he suffer?

You guys are hilarious.

26 U.S. Code § 7431 - Civil damages for unauthorized inspection or disclosure of returns and return information

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Big_Easy]

Says the guy who tried to argue Reagan was traitor for selling weapons to Iran, said there was no difference between legal and illegally immigrants, praised Biden for ending the war in Afghanistan, and stated brillant economic theories like you can't have a strong economy while running a deficit.

Please continue to enlighten us with more of your brilliance.

"Says the guy who tried to argue Reagan was traitor for selling weapons to Iran"

...You were the ones saying "we have been at war with Iran for 47 years" were you not? If that statement is true, and not complete nonsense, then when Reagan, a sitting US president, sold weapons to a country we were supposedly at war with at the time (says the other members on here) that would constitute an act of treason under us law would it not?

US Constitution: Article III, Section 3, Clause 1
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

Would selling weapons to our enemy be giving them "Aid"? Seems like it to me. Or, alternatively, you could all just admit that you're full of sh!t about this whole..."we've been at war with Iran for 47 years" BS. I know it's hard, but you can admit that Trump just started this war to distract from the Epstein files.

I mean, on June 21st, 2025 Trump gave a speech in which he told us that "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were totally and completely obliterated." So clearly we weren't going to war to stop them from making a bomb, we did that last year! That is of course unless Trump is a liar? And is totally full of crap? But it's hard to tell with all of his lies what's real and what is not. This is the second time in the past 25 years that a republican president has started a war after he told us that a country in the middle east is trying to make a WMD is it not?

 

[Big_Easy]

Aimee Bock sentenced to almost 42 years in prison for a Minnesota $250m covid fraud scheme.
Now they just need to round up,and ship out all of the Somali thieves.

Now if only Senator Rick Scott would be sentenced for his multi-billion dollar medicare fraud scheme.

 

[Big_Easy]

Says the guy who tried to argue Reagan was traitor for selling weapons to Iran, said there was no difference between legal and illegally immigrants, praised Biden for ending the war in Afghanistan, and stated brillant economic theories like you can't have a strong economy while running a deficit.

Please continue to enlighten us with more of your brilliance.

I never said there wasn't a difference between the two. I said what's the difference if a US citizen loses their job to an illegal immigrant or a legal immigrant? You still lost your job all the same. Less jobs will be lost by illegals since they mostly pick fruit/veggies in the fields, rather than IT jobs in an office.

 

[Big_Easy]

We have the sophomoric "buddy" BS from our resident troll again while referring to one of our more respected and informed posters (who actually has done something with his life) as representing a "clown show." Ignore this bitter little failure in life. With zero responses he'll go back to playing Call of Duty, or in his case perhaps Bricklayer, in whatever basement he resides.

I see that you’ve run out of ideas and have moved on to the ad hominem. I'll take that as a win. If any of you can ever form an actual counterargument, I'd be glad to hear it.

 

[Big_Easy]

Yes, it is astounding the iinfinitesimal cranial acuity some self proclaimed experts display. A wise man once said that when those types open their mouths their guts fall out.

Ok boomer.

 

[VertigoBE]

I will also note that I have many friends in the British gun trade. They are noticeably silent.

Seeing it could damage their business, I sure understand why they remain silent.

 

[VertigoBE]

Yes, it is astounding the iinfinitesimal cranial acuity some self proclaimed experts display. A wise man once said that when those types open their mouths their guts fall out.

My late grandmother would say that with such specimens, tone deaf and spilling nonsense, if you look them deep enough in their mouth, the only thing you’ll see in that cranial cavern is a piece of string. This is to keep their two ears attached.

 

[KJE81]

I was also under the impression that the IRS is part of the executive branch since its part of the Department of the treasury which is run by the Secretary of the treasury which is a member of the cabinet and is appointed by the president?

Is not the IRS Commissioner also appointed by the president?

I guess thats unless all of the above is incorrect one could be forgiven for thinking that Trump is indeed on both sides of this case.

 

[Altitude sickness]

With regards to Trump getting relief from the jackbooted IRS tactics.

I don’t particularly care about the inside baseball portion of the case.

I’m pleased that the IRS has been brushed back from the plate temporarily. Trump isn’t the only citizen the agency was directed to target. Remember In 2013, IRS official Lois Lerner revealed that conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status had been getting extra scrutiny, based on words such as "tea party" or "patriots" in their names.

This was the just another example of Obama’s war on conservative citizens. And perhaps the inception of the January 6th “Insurrection”. At the least, accelerated the division.

There’s nothing scarier or more intimidating than being a private citizen without the financial means to fight a federal agency.

So again. I don’t care if Trump deserves the ruling against the IRS. All I care about is the IRS has been put back on their heels for a brief period.

 

[skydiver386]

With regards to Trump getting relief from the jackbooted IRS tactics.

I don’t particularly care about the inside baseball portion of the case.

I’m pleased that the IRS has been brushed back from the plate temporarily. Trump isn’t the only citizen the agency was directed to target. Remember In 2013, IRS official Lois Lerner revealed that conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status had been getting extra scrutiny, based on words such as "tea party" or "patriots" in their names.

This was the just another example of Obama’s war on conservative citizens. And perhaps the inception of the January 6th “Insurrection”. At the least, accelerated the division.

There’s nothing scarier or more intimidating than being a private citizen without the financial means to fight a federal agency.

So again. I don’t care if Trump deserves the ruling against the IRS. All I care about is the IRS has been put back on their heels for a brief period.

Bullseye.

The Democrats have abused government power for decades through both State and Federal agencies. Now that they are getting the slap down they so thoroughly deserve, the same leftist Democrats act as if it's Trump that done did all the bad.