Politics

Since Trump is on a roll, maybe he can liberate Iran, North Korea, and Cuba.
Give the Democrats a big collective aneurysm.
I would be more impressed if he would liberate Russia, that would really show everyone that he is not in some way handled by Putin ;)
 
1-2 months ago, I was watching a documentary on the collapse of Venezuela. The most interesting part was an economist for the oil industry explaining what Hugo Chavez did that caused lasting damage. Due to the nationalization of all portions of the oil industry, the economist stated that 130,000 working years of oil and gas expertise left Venezuela during the Chavez era. He stated it would be the #1 obstacle to turning Venezuela back into a first world country because those capabilities cannot be easily recreated or reimported.
 
People deserve the representation they get.
This one here is bound to fail.

I don’t see much harm in this in aggregate, to be honest. US wealth isn’t going to disappear, it’s going to move. What I’ve seen over the past ten years is a flight to mid-market cities as the means of production finds friendly confines in red districts. At the top end, finance and real estate has fled NYC for Miami. Tech has fled San Francisco for Austin. Heck, even in my area I live in WI directly adjacent to the twin cities and due to George Floyd, Covid rules, BLM, and the Somali problems they’ve made St. Croix County WI the fastest growing in our whole state.

The pie isn’t shrinking or growing, the pie is moving to different plates.
 
But some questions remain...will China and Russia use Venezuela as an excuse to further ambitious action..? Will China move on Taiwan..what then Mr.Trump..? If Trump move on Greenland will Putin try to take Svalbard..? I can almost hear Putin... " Hey..you complain on us in Ukraine but look at what you do in the Americas..! ".
My estimate:
Yes, but not as an excuse. There must have been some diplomatic deals made not made public.
For example, China sold their interests in Panama, without a flinch. Basically within 24 hours.

My opinion is that we are witnessing tectonic political global changes, from mono polar world of pax americana, to multi polar world, with divided spheres on interest of major global powers.

In 20th century this caused two world wars.
Modern difference is nuclear deterrent, which makes major powers to be more cautions in their multilateral relations. Which gives us a chance to avoid major conflict.

Taiwan?
So, when Mao took China mainland, Chang Kei Shek moved to Taiwan, as goverment in exile and declared de iure (but not de facto) his goverment to be goverment for China mainland and Taiwan as one country .
Mao claimed the same.
So, it is not disputable that Taiwan and China are one country. It is the question of ruling regime here and there.
President Nixon accepted one China principle. It stayed like that
The rest we know from daily news, and developing political military tensions.

Besides,
China had similar things elsewhere, Hong Kong for example.
For China it is not unusual to have "special case provinces", but entire international political focus makes Taiwan high political tensions live for decades.
For Hong Kong they just waited their 156 years, to take over, UK pulled out, China took over, and Hong Kong still has some autonomy, but it is Chinese on the end

Chinese culture and attitude and philosophy is different than western.
Western approach is short term, like in one political term 4 years, or project investement turnover, or what will be in next decade?

China is one of the oldest countries in the World, 5000 years old. Older then Chrisitanity for example.
Chinese philosophy sees a thousand years as a blink of an eye. Decade is nothing. For Honk Kong they took their time, 156 years to wait, not loosing focus and time was never an object, and no issue. Diplomacy worked. No bullet fired.

So, in short term I dont think they will provoke any conflict. But they may take a military posture. However they might wait next 100 years, to make political and de facto move on Taiwan.
Time means nothing in Chinese philosophy, and in the same time global politics is very dynamic. Eventually they will get to politically convenient time to make the move
 
Hong Kong is different to Taiwan...it was the end of the lease with uk thst handed control back to them.....and they tore up the agreement about Hong Kong having a lot more freedom after it came back under Chinese control.....so no freedom there anymore... locked up if you probably even think anything against the state
 
For any who think Trump as a USA President is acting like a bull in a china shop, here’s a list of U.S. presidents who have authorized airstrikes or military actions without specific Congressional approval, organized by president and notable incidents. These actions were generally justified under the president’s constitutional authority as Commander in Chief or under previous authorizations such as the 2001 or 2002 AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force), but they did not involve new congressional votes beforehand:



Harry S. Truman

• Korea (1950) – Deployed U.S. forces and authorized airstrikes in Korea without formal Congressional declaration of war.



Dwight D. Eisenhower

• Lebanon (1958) – Ordered U.S. air and naval forces into Lebanon to stabilize a political crisis.



John F. Kennedy

• Cuba (1961–1962) – Bay of Pigs (though indirectly supported), and later the Cuban Missile Crisis military posture.



Lyndon B. Johnson

• Vietnam (1964) – Gulf of Tonkin airstrikes occurred before the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was passed.



Richard Nixon

• Cambodia & Laos (1969–1973) – Conducted secret and unauthorized bombing campaigns as part of Vietnam War.



Jimmy Carter

• Iran (1980) – Operation Eagle Claw failed attempt to free hostages



Ronald Reagan

• Libya (1986) – Bombed Tripoli and Benghazi in retaliation for the Berlin discotheque bombing.
• Grenada (1983) – Invasion and airstrikes without prior congressional approval.



George H. W. Bush

• Panama (1989) – Invasion and airstrikes to oust Manuel Noriega.
• Iraq (1990–1991) – Airstrikes began before Congress passed a resolution approving Desert Storm.



Bill Clinton

• Bosnia (1995) – NATO airstrikes in Bosnia without Congressional approval.
• Iraq (1998) – Operation Desert Fox airstrikes against Saddam Hussein.
• Kosovo (1999) – 78-day NATO bombing campaign without Congressional approval.



George W. Bush

• Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia (2001–2009) – Authorized drone strikes relying on the 2001 AUMF but without specific country-by-country authorization.



Barack Obama

• Libya (2011) – Air campaign as part of NATO action to topple Gaddafi, without Congressional approval.
• Syria, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen (2014–2016) – Airstrikes against ISIS and other terror groups under 2001 AUMF, no new authorization sought.



Donald Trump

• Syria (2017, 2018) – Airstrikes against Assad regime over chemical weapons, without Congressional approval.
• Iraq (2020) – Ordered airstrike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani.



Joe Biden

• Syria (2021, 2022) – Airstrikes on Iranian-backed militia groups.
• Somalia & Yemen (ongoing) – Continued air campaigns under prior AUMFs.



Summary:

Every U.S. president from Truman to Biden has authorized military airstrikes or operations without direct and new Congressional approval at some point during their presidency.
 
With respect, may I add, failure of nation building project in Afghanistan as well?

But, back to daily news: My personal estimate, as flawed, as it may be.

It was not ad hoc operation. It was planned. Therefor, some post operation plan must be ready.
(Yet to be seen)

If I refer again to recently published security strategy of US 2025, which calls for a Monroe doctrine revival 2.0: Most likely, this was agreed and dealt with during Putin / Trump meeting months ago. (which includes stable relations with Russia, as strategic goal)

Russian reaction on this latest American action is practically non existent, and may get as far as diplomatic note of protest just for show.

But the true deal could be that Russia does in Ukraine in their sphere of interest as they wish, and USA, will establish the interests on western hemisphere, which under Monroe doctrine will be western world: South America - North America - Caribbean, and most probably - Greenland (Arctic).

If we speak about following the latest American strategy, then president Trumps performance have been perfect, and with minimum treasure and blood loss (exactly as stated in strategy), Nothing short of perfect:

- Iran bombing operation. (the presentation of the Iranian mission by general Caine, is nothing short of impressive, available on YT)

- Panama take over operation

- Venezuela action

So, we will see what the next day brings.
The invasion of Iraq, my friend, was hardly an "ad hoc operation," and yest CENTCOM had neither enough troops nor an implementable occupation plan for the day after the government fell. The US military scrambled to deal with that oversight, always with inadequate troop strength and no clear intent, thanks largely to the hubris of one man. Donald Rumsfeld had not merely ignored the advice of the US Army, whose leadership had extensive peace enforcement experience in Eastern Europe, he publicly ridiculed it and those officers - most notably the Army Chief of Staff.

With respect to Russia, or Iran for that matter, a nation can only exercise regional hegemony if it has the power to do so. While the modern Russian state has the bellicosity to make many such demands, to date, it can't even exercise control of the airspace over Ukraine much less remove the government in Kyiv.

I would point out that their "elite" air assault forces attempted to do just that in the opening hours of their miscarried invasion with the insertion into Hostomel airfield. There over a period of days a brigade of the VDV and attached special operational troops were practically destroyed. Follow-on elements were able to maintain control into April, but due to the initial failure, the attack into Kyiv to remove the government collapsed. Even Russian milbloggers on Telegram have not been been able to spin that fiasco into a success.
 
Last edited:
What are everyone's thoughts on Maria Corina Muchado?

Maduro lost to her in the last election. He refused to step down and put out a warrant for her arrest!
The details of the above are complicated but the short story is she is a Nobel Peace Prize winner who Maduro tried his best to do everything short of killing her. Nevertheless, I think she may be the best hope for a stable government in Venezuela.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/María_Corina_Machado

This is a short video of her speaking in November 2025 about Maduro
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17uS38zGLC/

1767531425776.png
 
Here's another copy and paste,

Rep. Dan Crenshaw on Maduro Removal:

“I’ve been to Venezuela a dozen times. My family lived there after I graduated high school. I saw a good and prosperous Venezuela. After 25 years of socialist rule the country slowly decayed into a **** hole and became an ally of all of our enemies.

And we ignored it.
Until President Donald J. Trump.

Maduro is a tyrant, a murderer, a drug trafficker, a sponsor of terrorism, and an illegitimate President who stole the election in front of the whole world.

This is our hemisphere and we’ve ignored it for far too long. President Trump understands what “peace through strength” actually means. He understands the “strength” part while others just chant the slogan.

To the critics who will whine about the legality: tell me where you were when President Obama took out Qaddafi in Libya. The simple truth is that these strikes are within the President’s power.

Lastly, I will tell you what the vast majority of Venezuelans who have escaped tell me: please take out Maduro so Venezuelans can have Venezuela back.

For the people who truly know Venezuela, this is liberation not aggression.

President Trump has shown incredible courage in his first year back in office. This move is righteous and long overdue. Let the Venezuelan people take it from here. I believe they will.”

1767532169105.png
 
1-2 months ago, I was watching a documentary on the collapse of Venezuela. The most interesting part was an economist for the oil industry explaining what Hugo Chavez did that caused lasting damage. Due to the nationalization of all portions of the oil industry, the economist stated that 130,000 working years of oil and gas expertise left Venezuela during the Chavez era. He stated it would be the #1 obstacle to turning Venezuela back into a first world country because those capabilities cannot be easily recreated or reimported.
I worked with several former PDVSA employees. Chavez basically fired a large percentage of employees, base on political reasons. One guy told me, he went from being a well paid petroleum engineer, upper middle class in Venezuela, to un-employable overnight. He had two sons in college and had to call them up and tell them he could no longer support them and they would need to find work and fund the remainder of the education. His wife started baking bread, cakes and pies and this guy sold them on the street. Crime started to sky rocket with so many desperate people on the streets. The economy tanked. This same guy ended up coming to the US, earned a PhD in petroleum engineering at Univ. of Texas and got hired by Chevron, as did several of his colleagues.
 
I worked with several former PDVSA employees. Chavez basically fired a large percentage of employees, base on political reasons. One guy told me, he went from being a well paid petroleum engineer, upper middle class in Venezuela, to un-employable overnight. He had two sons in college and had to call them up and tell them he could no longer support them and they would need to find work and fund the remainder of the education. His wife started baking bread, cakes and pies and this guy sold them on the street. Crime started to sky rocket with so many desperate people on the streets. The economy tanked. This same guy ended up coming to the US, earned a PhD in petroleum engineering at Univ. of Texas and got hired by Chevron, as did several of his colleagues.

I’ve heard this story over and over again. In the early 2000s it was a Venezuelan tech renaissance. I worked for a F500 insurance company and we had 150+ Venezuelans working for us through one consulting firm alone. The brain drain was very real.

Out of curiousity, I tried to fathom how much Petroleum brain drain occurred in Venezuela by a comparison. If Venezuela lost 130,000 man years of senior expertise in the petroleum industry, how would that compare to say if we lost all our admirals and generals of the US armed forces? 950 Flag Officers with 30 years expertise each = 27,000 man years. That’s a pretty good comparison of how F’d Venezuela is with the knowledge drain presiding over the world’s largest oil reserves.
 
I would point out that their "elite" air assault forces attempted to do just that in the opening hours of their miscarried invasion with the insertion into Hostomel airfield. There over a period of days a brigade of the VDV and attached special operational troops were practically destroyed. Follow-on elements were able to maintain control into April, but due to the initial failure, the attack into Kyiv to remove the government collapsed. Even Russian milbloggers on Telegram have not been been able to spin that fiasco into a success.
This is indeed true!
But this was almost 4 years ago, and things developed.

What they did next is change the tactics to war of attrition. Which is ongoing, and affecting EU economy as well.
Inflation is very visible here, costs increasing, real-estate prices doubled.

What we can hope for, is that this will lead to economic collapse of Russia in foreseeable future. This war is costly. But, thats it, "to hope for".

4 years of this war, in effect made the biggest unprecedented crises on the continent till now, political and economical, and this was not expected in 2022 when all this was started. Something went astray, since initial invasion.
 
I don’t see much harm in this in aggregate, to be honest. US wealth isn’t going to disappear, it’s going to move. What I’ve seen over the past ten years is a flight to mid-market cities as the means of production finds friendly confines in red districts. At the top end, finance and real estate has fled NYC for Miami. Tech has fled San Francisco for Austin. Heck, even in my area I live in WI directly adjacent to the twin cities and due to George Floyd, Covid rules, BLM, and the Somali problems they’ve made St. Croix County WI the fastest growing in our whole state.

The pie isn’t shrinking or growing, the pie is moving to different plates.
Let me tell why why i dont like that guy.
He obviously looks like someone that waaay over his head but he is like Obama. They will open doors for worse people. Check how many head slammers are in Public offices all around the U.S now? it started as a drop of way now it is way bigger and most aren't noticing and in the next 10 years.......
 
?
610710523_122275845128210152_1140859177893226745_n.jpg
 
1-2 months ago, I was watching a documentary on the collapse of Venezuela. The most interesting part was an economist for the oil industry explaining what Hugo Chavez did that caused lasting damage. Due to the nationalization of all portions of the oil industry, the economist stated that 130,000 working years of oil and gas expertise left Venezuela during the Chavez era. He stated it would be the #1 obstacle to turning Venezuela back into a first world country because those capabilities cannot be easily recreated or reimported.

I had a fair amount of interaction with PDVSA pre-Chavez. I knew many oil industry professionals there. They didn’t all leave, many simply disappeared.

I disagree with the capability assessment. Given certainty and a fair playing field, multinationals would be there tomorrow with all the expertise necessary to rebuild.
 
Like Noreiga, him and maybe his wife will die in a U.S. prison. Classic FAFO.
Maduro is eerily calm and almost relieved in all his images and video now in custody.
My bet:
He will strike a deal and give up more information than the US hoped for. Ties to Iran, China, Russia, Hezbollah....all their communications, plans, logistics...everything. Let's also not forget the Venezuelan ties to certain voting machines.

At least he'll try for a deal and hope the US doesnt already know his secrets.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
65,209
Messages
1,438,718
Members
134,983
Latest member
RichieIvor
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

I have made it to Atlanta this morning, few other outfitters on same flight and our luggage never came trough, looks like mine will go via France to Denver hope it gets there before the ISE show starts on the 8th TOMORROW!



flying to Denver in an hour! is it to early to hit the bar:)
FIXING TO HEAD TO DALLAS FOR TEXAS TROPHY NEXT WEEK YALL COME SEE THE EVENT.
TakeMeLord wrote on Hunt anything's profile.
Suppressor Question.. you shot a waterbuck, followed vapor trail.
May I ask: Brand of Suppressor? Caliber of rifle
AND
Dis airport secutity give you any hassles about the silencer? Thanks, Dale
RolandtheHeadless wrote on intj's profile.
Hi. Will you take $90 including shipping for the 28 Nosler brass?

Jim
Mauser3000 wrote on HBartley's profile.
Hello,

I saw your post selling left hand rifles. Do you have any additional pics of the .416 Rem mag?

Thank you.

-Nathan
 
Top