fourfive8
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2017
- Messages
- 5,791
- Reaction score
- 13,998
- Location
- Western Slope CO, Mindanao RoP
- Media
- 266
- Hunted
- USA, South Africa, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Botswana
I posted a month or two back about a test I did on one of the readily available public internet AI services.
I asked a simple, specific question about a common subject of interest. Something like, “was this (fill in blank) successful?” The AI answer was “yes, it was successful”, along with all manner of supporting data for why it was successful.
I then asked the same AI source the converse of the same, identical question. Something like, “was this (fill in the blank- identical to original subject) unsuccessful?” The AI answer was “yes, it was unsuccessful”, along with all manner of supporting data for why it
No one can convince me AI is not extremely dangerous and a potential future train wreck the likes of which we’ve never experienced. At best, maybe a handy tool with very fast search/sort algorithms but dumb as a rock. At worst, a very real nightmare.
I asked a simple, specific question about a common subject of interest. Something like, “was this (fill in blank) successful?” The AI answer was “yes, it was successful”, along with all manner of supporting data for why it was successful.
I then asked the same AI source the converse of the same, identical question. Something like, “was this (fill in the blank- identical to original subject) unsuccessful?” The AI answer was “yes, it was unsuccessful”, along with all manner of supporting data for why it
No one can convince me AI is not extremely dangerous and a potential future train wreck the likes of which we’ve never experienced. At best, maybe a handy tool with very fast search/sort algorithms but dumb as a rock. At worst, a very real nightmare.
Last edited:

