And it really sucks when you do that research and find out you were sold a pile a crap.
As far as USFWS, how many boots do the have on the ground trying to verify facts before the put up the restrictions?
We both know the answers to those.
That is why any of us making assumptions about fenced or unfenced areas creates a false sense of security.
1. It sucks no matter where you are taken advantage of. I applaud the OP for trying to learn so much in advance.
2. None. But, it does not stop the false assumptions anyone can make from that information does it?!


poor DONKEY has been beaten so many times. One thing I have seen with a post like this is it starts to divide hunters against each other and gentlemen/ladies that is not a good thing with all the pressure we already have as hunters. There is a place for fenced hunting and there is a place for wild open hunting. If there's a species I am truly passionate about hunting, it is sable in their true enviroment, when I see posts of a sable hunt where they don't naturally occur, it would make my blood boil, but since this post started I have changed my mind. What about the 80 year old that would love to hunt a sable, he's not going to handle the roughness of Mozambique. But he could get his sable in one of these fenced areas, it will be his pride and joy. But when I see an able hunter jump on a fenced hunt so he can clock up his trophy collection, to me that's wrong. Remote places don't always mean higher dollars.