Bedding a Husqvarna 1640 9.3x62

wheelgun6t9

New member
Joined
Nov 25, 2025
Messages
7
Reaction score
5
Hi All!! I've done a lot of reading but haven't seen exactly what I'm looking to understand. I recently purchased a Husqvarna 1640 in 9.3x62 and though I have a lot of experience with 30-06, I've never owned anything with more punch.

The barrel is not free-floated at all and I'm concerned about potential cracking in the wrist. The wood is up against the rear tang.

So here's my questions to put to the experts here! I suspect these have been answered but my searches haven't been super successful.

1) How far up past the lug would you recommend I bed? a couple inches?

2) I'm confused on bedding the tang area. If I relieve the wood a bit behind the tang, but then add bedding to that area, what's the difference between the steel up against the stock vs bedding up aganst the stock. It would seem both would add pressure and potentially cause a crack. Do folks just leave a space behind the tang?

3) One last question - is the recoil of the 9.3x62 enough that I should consider adding pillars or cross bolts or is that overkill for this caliber?

Thanks so much for any opinions folks have on this!
 
I’m not 100% familiar with the 1640, is that the one based on the 98 action? Or the 96?
And assuming it is a standard style rifle and not a full wood (stutzen)

1) I bed the Knox form past the lug area however far that is on your barrel
2) relieve the back of the tang and the sides if they taper, do not re-bed this area, only under the tang to give a flat surface for the tang to pull against, but on a good stock this shouldn’t be necessary
3) check to see if there is an internal cross bolt, if not I would add a cross bolt to be safe. It may not need it but I tend to add them, it shouldn’t need pillars, if any it would only be the back one if a 98 style receiver
Gumpy
 
I’m not 100% familiar with the 1640, is that the one based on the 98 action? Or the 96?
And assuming it is a standard style rifle and not a full wood (stutzen)

1) I bed the Knox form past the lug area however far that is on your barrel
2) relieve the back of the tang and the sides if they taper, do not re-bed this area, only under the tang to give a flat surface for the tang to pull against, but on a good stock this shouldn’t be necessary
3) check to see if there is an internal cross bolt, if not I would add a cross bolt to be safe. It may not need it but I tend to add them, it shouldn’t need pillars, if any it would only be the back one if a 98 style receiver
Gumpy
Thank you for the insights! The 1640 is 98 style (3 lug) but the serial number puts mine at 1958 so I think it's somewhat modified from the standard 98 action (but I'm still learning so definitely no expert on this action)

I really appreciate your recommendations!
 
@Grumpy gumpy Covered it quite well.

The rear pillar on this style action is more to keep the heavy handed from tightening the rear action screw to the point it starts crushing wood. so if you are a gorilla kinda guy with a turn screw put in a pillar if you stay within the torque specs you are good to go.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
64,455
Messages
1,419,308
Members
130,415
Latest member
VickieJ10
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

wheelerdan wrote on Jager Waffen74's profile.
Sir, I think I have been writing to you about the purchase of the HK 639 rifle under an email "Tt Jake." If this is you, then I am truly interested. I am just trying to verify identify. Tt Jake is asking for a cash transaction. No disrespect intended, Just trying to verify who I am talking to. Thank you. Respectfully. Dan
Gary C wrote on HuntingFreak's profile.
Hey my friend, I am returning to SA for a Cape Buffalo hunt in June 26. My outfitter has suggested Highveld but I have read some poor reports. Wondering how satisfied you were with your mounts from them? Thanks in advance.
Finally back to somewhat normal I missed reading the messages and posts
 
Top