9.3X62 for Cape Buffalo?

Discussion in 'Up To .375' started by moosemike, Apr 20, 2013.

  1. TokkieM

    TokkieM AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2012
    Messages:
    983
    Video/Photo:
    54
    Likes Received:
    1,397
    Location:
    Sweden/South Africa
    Hunted:
    South Africa,Zimbabwe,Sweden
    :) It is actually what is called a Scandinavian slip on bolt knob. It is a rubber cup type cover that makes it easier to grab the bolt with thick gloves, but I have used it in Africa for a fee years too, makes grabbing and operating the bolt much earier and comes to hand quicker than the standard bolt knob, great for when your hands are sweaty after hours of hunting:)
     

  2. Russel. G. Keith

    Russel. G. Keith AH Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    32
    Hi Guys
    I have used and carried a 9.3x62 in Africa for more years than I care to remember.
    A Sauer and Son with 1/2 octagon 1/2 round barrel and the slimmest stock imaginable cracked at the hand but beautifully repaird Just short of 7lbs all up.
    In the end I loaded her with 270grn Monometal Dual diameter solids with a sharp cutting shoulder. This bullet I found so effective I used it for all my shooting with the 9.3 (I used a 6.5x55 more when I was forced to move to more "civilised" climes.)
    Not my first choice for Buff but the 9.3x62 will do the job if you do yours.
    Any shot you would take with the 300grn 375 you can take with the 9.3 but over penetration can be a problem with both kalibers so take care with broad side shots .
    A suggestion find a good monometal solid (preferably with a cutting shoulder) and stick to that. The old trick of loading soft solid soft solid is a good idea in principle.............................But experience has taught me that that $%$$% Murphy has a habit of pitching up when least expected/wanted.
    Be safe
    Russel
     
    cem rona ergin likes this.

  3. Witold Krzyżanowski

    Witold Krzyżanowski AH ENABLER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    Messages:
    4,617
    Video/Photo:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Location:
    Trzebiatów
    Member of:
    1977; Polish Hunting Assotiation
    Hunted:
    Namibia, Zimbabwe
    I agree with Hunthardsafaris. Beautiful rifle in my favorite caliber. Congrats.
    Witold
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2015
    TokkieM likes this.

  4. 8x68

    8x68 AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2015
    Messages:
    640
    Video/Photo:
    11
    Likes Received:
    447
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Member of:
    OFAH, CCFR
    Hunted:
    Canada, USA
    I have a CZ 550 in 9.3x62 and would have no problem taking a Cape Buffalo with it. It's more than capable as long as you do your part.
     
    Milan and Witold Krzyżanowski like this.

  5. Witold Krzyżanowski

    Witold Krzyżanowski AH ENABLER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    Messages:
    4,617
    Video/Photo:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Location:
    Trzebiatów
    Member of:
    1977; Polish Hunting Assotiation
    Hunted:
    Namibia, Zimbabwe
    I think that 9,3 x 62 is forgotten caliber for dangerous game. This caliber is a sensible alternative to 375 H&H.
    9,3 x 62 slowly but steadily recovers its rightful place among the calibers for dangerous game.
    9,3 x 62 is my favorite caliber.
    Witold
     
    sgt_zim, ve7poi, Bushpig4Ever and 7 others like this.

  6. stug

    stug AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    899
    Video/Photo:
    7
    Likes Received:
    861
    Location:
    Canterbury, New Zealand
    Hunted:
    NZ
    I'm pretty sure this Mauser 9.3x62 will have shot Buffalo. It came from a farming family in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. There were some Kynoch solids thay came with it. If only the scars could talk!

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    Vanguard2279, Don458, ve7poi and 11 others like this.

  7. Witold Krzyżanowski

    Witold Krzyżanowski AH ENABLER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    Messages:
    4,617
    Video/Photo:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2,181
    Location:
    Trzebiatów
    Member of:
    1977; Polish Hunting Assotiation
    Hunted:
    Namibia, Zimbabwe
    Pictures old Mauser,I like it stug.
    Thank you Mike.
    Witold
     

  8. bebo

    bebo AH Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    324
    Video/Photo:
    9
    Likes Received:
    28
    @enysse
    hello, when you indicate the minimum energy (Zimbabwe), it's @the impact or @the muzzle?
     

  9. enysse

    enysse AH ENABLER AH Ambassador

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    11,330
    Video/Photo:
    136
    Likes Received:
    3,619
    Member of:
    Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF
    Hunted:
    Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)
    It's muzzle.
     

  10. bebo

    bebo AH Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    324
    Video/Photo:
    9
    Likes Received:
    28
    Ok. Thanks.
     

  11. Scrumbag

    Scrumbag AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    530
    Video/Photo:
    19
    Likes Received:
    265
    Member of:
    BASC, SCI
    Hunted:
    Europe
    I have a lot of faith in Norma ammo for various things. I'd love to put the 9.3x62 325gr Oryx to use on something. (Maybe Aussie buff...)
     

  12. Milan

    Milan AH Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    319
    Video/Photo:
    33
    Likes Received:
    185
    Hunted:
    Alberta, RSA
    The CZ in 9.3x62 is the medium/long action. Not a magnum action. It is just like a Mauser 98 or like Brno ZKK 600. So I would imagine same size and weight roughly as the M77 Hawkey Standard.
     

  13. Wayne t

    Wayne t AH Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2016
    Messages:
    169
    Video/Photo:
    1
    Likes Received:
    89
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    Member of:
    BDS
    Hunted:
    U.K. Croatia
    Hmmmmm. I've just given my husqvarna 6.5 to the girlfriend bugger may need a quick rethink on it
     
    enysse likes this.

  14. Rule 303

    Rule 303 AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    589
    Video/Photo:
    1
    Likes Received:
    432
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Hunted:
    Australia, New Zealand, Zimbabwe & Namibia
    More than a few Aussie Buff have been taken with the 9.3X62. One bloke I know just stuff them with Woodleigh Hydrostatic bullets for any DG.
     

  15. ve7poi

    ve7poi AH Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    489
    Video/Photo:
    9
    Likes Received:
    263
    Location:
    Taylor British Columbia Canada
    Member of:
    Life member SCI
    Hunted:
    British Columbia, Alberta, South Africa
    That's where the 9.3x66 aka 370 Sako comes in lol
     

  16. Rule 303

    Rule 303 AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    589
    Video/Photo:
    1
    Likes Received:
    432
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Hunted:
    Australia, New Zealand, Zimbabwe & Namibia
    I wonder if richteb meant the 9.3X64. Load that up and you could achieve those velocities.
     
    Don458 likes this.

  17. Shootist43

    Shootist43 AH ENABLER GOLD SUPPORTER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,819
    Video/Photo:
    22
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    Location:
    Grosse Ile, Michigan
    Member of:
    NRA
    Hunted:
    Michigan, Texas, Missouri, Limpopo Province South Africa
    Please, PLEASE take a look an any ballistics chart for a 35 Whelen pushing a 225 Gr bullet at 2700 fps compared to a 9.3 x 62 or a 9.3 x 74R with their 286 Gr. bullets. The 35 Whelen has them both beat. It's not that I dislike or disrespect the 9.3(s) I just don't like seeing the Whelen rated second best. Maybe that is because I own a couple of Whelens and not any rifles in 9.3.
     
    Red Leg likes this.

  18. Red Leg

    Red Leg AH ENABLER LIFETIME BRONZE BENEFACTOR AH Legend

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    4,259
    Video/Photo:
    239
    Likes Received:
    9,040
    Location:
    Texas Hill Country
    Member of:
    SCI DSC life memberships / NRA Patron Life
    Hunted:
    Mexico, Namibia, RSA, Germany, Austria, Argentina, Canada, Mozambique, Spain, US (15 states)
    I love the 35 Whelen, but those 286's should out penetrate your 225's on anything big and tough. For the same reason I prefer the 250 gr .338 over a 225 in 35 Whelen if I know I have to really drive through something tough or carry that penetration out there a ways.
     
    ve7poi and Velo Dog like this.

  19. Longwalker

    Longwalker AH Fanatic

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    518
    Video/Photo:
    44
    Likes Received:
    829
    Member of:
    Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation, Saskatoon Gun Dog Club
    Hunted:
    Canada USA, Germany, South Africa, Namibia
    I've shot a bunch of elk with three different .35 Whelens over the past 25 years or so, and my experience indicates that 225 grain bullets from a Whelen kill elk just fine, but they do not penetrate as well as 250's, and the longer, slower 250s are more reliable when they hit heavy bone.

    The suggestion is that a 225 gr. .35 Whelen beats a similar construction 9.3x62 286 grain? Sorry I don't buy that. Calculated energy figures do not translate exactly to game killing performance in the field. In my experience, a bullet with greater sectional density, and diameter, and weight going just slightly slower will penetrate further, in a straighter line, than a lighter, shorter, faster bullet of similar construction. Big critters are not as succespable to foot pounds of energy as they are to destruction of major organs and bones.

    Nosler's published ammunition data:
    9.3 x 62 / 286 Partition: MUZ: 2,350fps 3506ft/lb.

    35 Whelen, / 225 partition, MUZ: 2,750fps 3777ft/lb.

    The Whelen is one of my all time favourites, and it's not "second best" but it shoots lighter bullets faster than the 9.3, which I feel makes it slightly more suitable for smaller animals farther away, and the 9.3's bigger heavier bullets are slightly more suitable for larger or nasty critters not quite so far away.

    Most hunters would never notice a difference on any moderate size animal at moderate range. The Whelen might even be superior on medium game like kudu. On real big stuff like buffalo, I'd certainly feel happier with a 9.3/286 gr. and not worry about the "inferior" foot pounds of energy at all.

    I recently took delivery of my first 9.3x62, after observing my brother in action for a few years with his. I might soon sell my last .35 Whelen, too much overlap.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2017
    BC.Pat, Milan, ve7poi and 1 other person like this.

  20. Shootist43

    Shootist43 AH ENABLER GOLD SUPPORTER AH Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2015
    Messages:
    4,819
    Video/Photo:
    22
    Likes Received:
    3,957
    Location:
    Grosse Ile, Michigan
    Member of:
    NRA
    Hunted:
    Michigan, Texas, Missouri, Limpopo Province South Africa
    I've never shot anything larger than an Eland with my 35 Whelen. Both bullets were pass throughs. I guess I could concede the penetration argument between a 225 Gr Whelen and a 286 Gr 9.3. However if we up the anti on the Whelen to a 250 Gr Bullet the energy at 100 yards is 3088 lbs vs 2953lbs for the 9.3. At 200 yards the Whelen yields 2619 lbs vs 2462 for the 9.3. At what point does a slight difference in bullet weight become a non factor. I guess what I'm trying to say is that IF a 9.3 x 62 is adequate for buffalo than a 35 Whelen should be adequate also.

    A couple of days ago I asked if a 400 Gr Hornady InterBond bullet (90 + percent retention) in a 416 Rigby could be used for Buffalo. The consensus boiled down to (probably not) citing that Swift A Frames would be significantly better. Given good shot placement, how much gun does it take to "drop" one of these things?
     
    flatwater bill and Wayne t like this.

Share This Page

 
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice