Politics

It is shocking how we still allow China the amount of freedom to steal from or colleges, and industry. We are too concerned with being called xenophobic to give many of them the boot. Plus China gives our schools a lot of money to allow their students.
 
Remember when the media openly mocked the announcement of the Space Force.

The Air Force was handling most of the Space technology for a long time before Trump formed the SF. The Space Force has been busy since Trump lost in 2020 and now are much closer the having a “Golden Dome”.

So what has been a quiet arms race in space will become the next segment of the Cold War. Everyone with a rocket will have a weapon in space. A handful already have them.

Land based weapons needing to climb to orbit then descend will be too slow in the near future.

Undersea, near shore launch platforms will still be viable. But sending an ICBM over the ice caps gives too much time to eliminate the equipment that guides them. Or the weapon itself.

thankfully they didn’t name it Skynet.

Goldendome is more comforting :LOL:

 
One more and I’ll get off my morning soapbox. If someone was building a pattern on my routine. I would be an easy target :LOL: :oops:


Watching this video. I hope Marco Rubio is our 2028 candidate. What a PitBull. Sharp and fast while handling a Lump of $h!! Like VanHolen

 
The Russian dictator has set his country up for war for decades. For him, there can be no turning back in Ukraine. Because Putin's goals have not changed at all. He wants to take over the neighbouring country completely. Even Donald Trump noticed that - and yet let himself be shown.

The fact that Donald Trump keeps talking or writing nonsense is less due to stupidity than ignorance. The US president lives, surrounded by lackeys, in a self-created bubble in which only one truth counts: his own. He probably seriously believes that Vladimir Putin is "sathating" the war. That was mistake one. Mistake two goes like this: "He doesn't stand well there and wants to look good. Don't forget that the whole thing should actually be over in a week. If he hadn't been stuck in the mud with his tanks, they would have been in Kiev in about five hours."

Even if one has long since become accustomed to the fact that the president of the most powerful country in the world likes to bluff out into the world when the day is long, the high degree of ignorance is always shocking. But unlike in his first term, Trump has managed to protect his bubble against every small stab from the inside and outside, to make it impenetrable. Anyone who contradicts him and expresses doubts about his - imagined - political artistry will be banned from insults. Whoever confirms it, flatters it and confirms its - imagined - uniqueness, has an easier game.

Putin, as nealous and stupid as his American counterpart, mercilessly exploits the character traits in his favour. The mass murderer in the Kremlin is skilful at making Trump feel like his buddy and being on par with him. But that is not the case. The Russian is - unlike the US president - a calm strategist who has a plan and goes through it iron, without telling anything else day after day. In terms of cunning and cunning, Putin is far superior to Trump - which means something. The first man in the White House looks up to him because Putin is doing exactly what the American does not or does not yet dare: to secure his power by all imaginable means - and to take what he wants by force.

Putin can only war.

"Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations about a ceasefire and, more importantly, about an END to the war," Trump said after the phone call with Putin. He, in turn, placed emphasis on the statement "that Russia's overall position is clear. Our main goal is to eliminate the causes of this crisis." There are worlds between the statements.

"I will end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours," Trump had declared in the election campaign. Like so many of his sayings a joke. From time to time, however, there are bright spots that soften the impression of complete ignorance of the situation. So it was when the US president recently said at a meeting with major donors that Putin wanted "the whole thing". Correct. The Russian dictator wants to take Ukraine completely, whether in war or by surrendering the country, he does not care at all. But a forced pseudo-peace is never based on reconciliation and therefore carries the risk of further bloodshed. Hopefully the president will realise that at some point.
ntv
 

Under attack by Trump, South Africa's Ramaphosa responds with trade deal offer​

  • Ramaphosa to visit Trump at White House on Wednesday
  • Trump has criticised South Africa, cut aid, expelled envoy
  • Pretoria reject his attacks as inaccurate, insensitive
  • Trump wants US companies to be exempt from race rules
  • Ramaphosa to discuss opportunities for Musk's companies

 
For any of you that are headed to Canada just a heads up , exchange your currency at a banking institution. I can’t speak for the rest of the country but locally small businesses that used to offer exchange rates are now only accepting u.s. currency at 1/1.
As mentioned previously, I was surprised at the level of animosity toward the US when we returned home to visit my in-laws. Personally, I would not hesitate to fly up (of course I’m using a Canadian passport when I do), but I would not drive across the border and run around with US plates on my vehicle.
 
Big Beautiful Bill

Apparently the SALT portion of the bill is first to be jettisoned. Medicaid waste, fraud and abuse cuts are staying in.
It seems it went the other way. Higher caps on SALT.
 
Munnick, I’m searching, but have not been successful finding the post from you criticizing Obama and Hillary’s Russian reset button, and Obama telling Mitt Romney that the 1980s wants their foreign policy back.
In Obama, we had a President that saw his own country as an oppressor and actually needed to be knocked down a peg or two. and is happy that our ranking has been lowered. To Obama and his ilk there is no such thing as US exceptionalism. He is a globalist.

We all know Trump is a Self aggrandizing childish egomaniac. That has to be patted on the back constantly. But more importantly than stating like a two-year-old that “I will end the war in a day”. more important is that Obama’s weakness and deference to Putin did allow this war. Obama basically told Putin with his actions that he would not do anything about Crimea or Ukraine .

Harping on the fact that a ridiculous statement made by Trump that he would end the war in a week is as childish as the statement itself. I’m more concerned about whose policies actually start wars. there is a common theme throughout history of what start wars.

If Trump does find himself as a wartime president, one thing our enemy knows is the silly rules of engagement from decades past are gone. We will actually fight to win, more along the lines of how Israel fights a war. There is a direct correlation from when Obama changed our rules of engagement and the death toll rising during the GWOT.
 
Remember when the media openly mocked the announcement of the Space Force.

The Air Force was handling most of the Space technology for a long time before Trump formed the SF. The Space Force has been busy since Trump lost in 2020 and now are much closer the having a “Golden Dome”.

So what has been a quiet arms race in space will become the next segment of the Cold War. Everyone with a rocket will have a weapon in space. A handful already have them.

Land based weapons needing to climb to orbit then descend will be too slow in the near future.

Undersea, near shore launch platforms will still be viable. But sending an ICBM over the ice caps gives too much time to eliminate the equipment that guides them. Or the weapon itself.

thankfully they didn’t name it Skynet.

Goldendome is more comforting :LOL:

This capability has quietly matured a lot over the last twenty years and long before space force. Though not a classified budget item, the work has not gained a lot of public attention. Also, the various programs have been managed by DOD through the Missile Defense Agency (MDA), not the air force. There is no indication that MDA's responsibilities will change as a result of the creation of space force. It, like the other three services will manage programs specific to their role under MDA. I would anticipate the air force would eventually transfer mid course intercept and sensor programs to space force.

MDA has awarded $7-11 billion a year since 2002 for a total of approximately $200 billion through 2004. Patriot modernization and THAAD are managed by the Army. (though Patriot has too short a range to be effective against nuclear weapons.) The Navy manages AEGIS related programs.

As you suggest, space is where the interception battle will be fought and that has been the centerpiece of MDA's efforts. The primary corporate players over the last twenty years have been Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon. That initial space-based intercept capability could be in place fairly quickly. The technology is is mature, but there has not been a will to deploy it - which, of course, will be quite expensive.

ICBMs do not go into orbit. They, like intercontinental hypersonics, do go into space for the mid-course of their trajectory.

The biggest challenge over the last 15 years or so has been decoy technology. A Russian ICBM payload, depending on the missile, would contain five to ten independently targeted munitions along with at least an equal number of decoys. This obviously complicates the intercept challenge.

The second challenge is the emerging hypersonic technology. A traditional ICBM follows a fairly predictable ballistic trajectory. A true hypersonic, unlike anything Russia has yet fielded, will have the ability to maneuver somewhat during its mid-course glide phase. It flies a lower trajectory than an ICBM providing less time for mid-course intercept and introduces the maneuverability problem.

The backbone of both Russia's and China's arsenals will remain standard ICBMs and SLBMs for decades to come.
 
Last edited:
The Russian dictator has set his country up for war for decades. For him, there can be no turning back in Ukraine. Because Putin's goals have not changed at all. He wants to take over the neighbouring country completely. Even Donald Trump noticed that - and yet let himself be shown.

The fact that Donald Trump keeps talking or writing nonsense is less due to stupidity than ignorance. The US president lives, surrounded by lackeys, in a self-created bubble in which only one truth counts: his own. He probably seriously believes that Vladimir Putin is "sathating" the war. That was mistake one. Mistake two goes like this: "He doesn't stand well there and wants to look good. Don't forget that the whole thing should actually be over in a week. If he hadn't been stuck in the mud with his tanks, they would have been in Kiev in about five hours."

Even if one has long since become accustomed to the fact that the president of the most powerful country in the world likes to bluff out into the world when the day is long, the high degree of ignorance is always shocking. But unlike in his first term, Trump has managed to protect his bubble against every small stab from the inside and outside, to make it impenetrable. Anyone who contradicts him and expresses doubts about his - imagined - political artistry will be banned from insults. Whoever confirms it, flatters it and confirms its - imagined - uniqueness, has an easier game.

Putin, as nealous and stupid as his American counterpart, mercilessly exploits the character traits in his favour. The mass murderer in the Kremlin is skilful at making Trump feel like his buddy and being on par with him. But that is not the case. The Russian is - unlike the US president - a calm strategist who has a plan and goes through it iron, without telling anything else day after day. In terms of cunning and cunning, Putin is far superior to Trump - which means something. The first man in the White House looks up to him because Putin is doing exactly what the American does not or does not yet dare: to secure his power by all imaginable means - and to take what he wants by force.

Putin can only war.

"Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations about a ceasefire and, more importantly, about an END to the war," Trump said after the phone call with Putin. He, in turn, placed emphasis on the statement "that Russia's overall position is clear. Our main goal is to eliminate the causes of this crisis." There are worlds between the statements.

"I will end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours," Trump had declared in the election campaign. Like so many of his sayings a joke. From time to time, however, there are bright spots that soften the impression of complete ignorance of the situation. So it was when the US president recently said at a meeting with major donors that Putin wanted "the whole thing". Correct. The Russian dictator wants to take Ukraine completely, whether in war or by surrendering the country, he does not care at all. But a forced pseudo-peace is never based on reconciliation and therefore carries the risk of further bloodshed. Hopefully the president will realise that at some point.
ntv
A poorly narrated regurgitation of a German news article
 
As mentioned previously, I was surprised at the level of animosity toward the US when we returned home to visit my in-laws. Personally, I would not hesitate to fly up (of course I’m using a Canadian passport when I do), but I would not drive across the border and run around with US plates on my vehicle.
I find that very strange as a reaction of the Canadian people... What can a US citizen really do about what happens on the political side, on the highest echelon's, between two countries? That's as if I would treat a random Russian I meet in the street, any different than before.

Sounds like something short-sighted people would do. Substituting the individual for the group.
 
I find that very strange as a reaction of the Canadian people... What can a US citizen really do about what happens on the political side, on the highest echelon's, between two countries? That's as if I would treat a random Russian I meet in the street, any different than before.

Sounds like something short-sighted people would do. Substituting the individual for the group.
+1.
 
I find that very strange as a reaction of the Canadian people... What can a US citizen really do about what happens on the political side, on the highest echelon's, between two countries? That's as if I would treat a random Russian I meet in the street, any different than before.

Sounds like something short-sighted people would do. Substituting the individual for the group.

Well I am in the short sighted team on a certain "group" ....
 
House GOP leaders agree to 40% SALT cap.
SALT exemptions shouldn't even be a thing
People vote with their wallets most of the time. It also is not just high tax blue states. A lot of middle-class voters in Texas pay more than $10K (current SALT limit) in property taxes.

High earners in high tax states have loopholes that avoid the deduction limitation with the co-operation of those States.
 
Well I am in the short sighted team on a certain "group" ....
I have many Russian, Ukrainian, Polish, friends and colleagues. None of them (as far as I know) are directly involved with the decision making around the war between Russia and Ukraine. Should I treat any of them any different now, because an egomaniac wants to dunk it out with his neighbour? I'd rather treat each of them as their individual person merits it.
 
I have many Russian, Ukrainian, Polish, friends and colleagues. None of them (as far as I know) are directly involved with the decision making around the war between Russia and Ukraine. Should I treat any of them any different now, because an egomaniac wants to dunk it out with his neighbour? I'd rather treat each of them as their individual person merits it.
Wasn't referring to any of those....certain Russians I am sure I could put in a group...but as said a different "group"....
 
As far as I’m concerned separatism is treason and should be treated as such.
Might want to do some research into the meaning of a "federal" state and how if differs from a unitary state . . .

And then look at the Constitution Acts, and their history . . .
 
I find that very strange as a reaction of the Canadian people... What can a US citizen really do about what happens on the political side, on the highest echelon's, between two countries? That's as if I would treat a random Russian I meet in the street, any different than before.

Sounds like something short-sighted people would do. Substituting the individual for the group.
I found it beyond odd to be in church on Sunday and have the pastor praying for the country in the midst of their trade war with the US.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,098
Messages
1,335,237
Members
114,186
Latest member
CindyMoraly
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

aquinn wrote on Raptor59's profile.
I'd like a bag of 100. I could actually pick it up since I'm in North Irving, but if you prefer, shipping it is fine.
Good day I'm Rainhold Neumbo form Namibia, I'm a professional taxidermist, anyone, can help me job I do mounting animal, full mounts, wall pedestal, shoulder mounts and many other, I'm based in Namibia I willing to travel where opportunities are, thank you, my WhatsApp number +264-814136480.
Email address neumbomakafa9@gmail.com
Just did a podcast, check it out if interested!

 
Top