Politics


It doesnt apply to anyone other than the below (top section of the attached link)...

It basically requires actual office holders and candidates, political committees, and people that get paid (or otherwise compensated) to create political advertising to be truthful in advertising... they can no longer outright lie and get away with it..

It doesn't apply to you, me, or anyone else that goes to a meme generator and decides to make fun of AOC, or some lie that Tump/Biden/whoever told, etc..


 

I dont see Alberta leaving Canada.. but this is certainly an interesting move..
 
Thank you @mdwest for the clarification.
 
Once again Amy Coney Barrett doesn’t fail to disappoint as she recuses herself from doing her job…..,
 
Also if China dumped the products in Canada then Amazon sends it from Canada to the US it’s a lower level. So within a week there would be gaming the system. Also an issue. Canada has been helping China bypass past tariffs.
True, TEMU’s main warehouse is in Canada.
By the way I am all for Amazon and every business posting additional tariff fees. It gives me the transparency to see where I chose to spend my money.

If the item is $10 more made in the US. No tariff. That’s where I’m buying.
The problem is that most items are made elsewhere and not cost effective or possible to bring the production to the US.
Heck, it is interesting that Apple is moving production from China to India not the USA.

One other thing. We decided a while back to move from a manufacturing oriented economy to service oriented economy and farmed manufacturing overseas, it is not coming back in volume to matter.

However, the biggest threat to our services oriented economy is not China, but computers and AI.
 
Once again Amy Coney Barrett doesn’t fail to disappoint as she recuses herself from doing her job…..,
That is what she is supposed to do. I didn’t see you complaining when Sotomayor did the same thing on a few cases where she had a conflict of interest.
 
Trump knew exactly what he was doing.. it wasn't a mistake.. it was a purposeful move...

That is 100% correct. It was by design.
Do you want a strong opposition or a weak opposition for the next 3.5 years?

He poured new gas on fire AGAIN just a couple days before the election day to ensure he gets what he wants. Making sure the button he pushed earlier it’s still down.

Trump does what is good for him and his family first. For his business partners next. At one stage he does what is good for the USA.
Canada is not even on his list.

But the blame for the results rests 100% on the Canadian’s shoulders. We own it. And we’ll pay for our choice. In an ideal world people should be able to think for themselves. But we live in the real world……
 
Midwest, during today’s cabinet meeting Trump basically said exactly what you posted above.

That he prefers the liberal PM over the “conservative”

They meeting within the week. And Carney said he wants to resolve this tariff issue.

Your were right on the money.
 
Is it safe to say that Trump cost the conservatives in Canada the election?
Is it safe to say that Canadian conservatives lost the election because voters are influenced by a biased media, that used the tariff and trade war to peddle fear?
We have plenty of that type here that vote democrat.
 
Once again Amy Coney Barrett doesn’t fail to disappoint as she recuses herself from doing her job…..,
She was a poor choice of the Trumpster
 
Is it safe to say that Canadian conservatives lost the election because voters are influenced by a biased media, that used the tariff and trade war to peddle fear?
We have plenty of that type here that vote democrat.
The average voter is low information as a rule.. It’s obviously a mix but trump has basically stated that it was his goal.. Just don’t see how it’s good for the US. Long term
 
Interesting that a Republican/ Conservative President would rather deal with a Liberal/ Democrat Prime Minister.

Trump is a showman.. and Carney is easy to make a "show" of...

Carney embraces China.. Trump hates China..

Carney is all about climate change and having a balanced carbon policy.. Trump thinks everything remotely related to this is hogwash.. Carney has gone so far to say he plans on putting into place a mechanism that implements tariffs on countries that have weaker carbon rules than Canada.. that puts Trump in a HUGE position of leverage when discussing US tariffs against Canadian products..

Carney loves "liberal" immigration policies.. Trump clearly hates open borders and liberal immigration policy..

The list goes on and on and on regarding their stark differences.. Im not sure if they agree on anything at all when it comes to the fundamentals of the primary fiscal or social issues circling the globe today..

Which makes Carney (and Canada) an easy target..

Its not going to be hard to get MAGA, or even the centrists on board with Trump tariff policy toward Carney... when Carney starts bitching about "new tariffs".. all Trump has to do is say "yeah... that carbon tariff you said you're going to implement...lets talk about that for a minute..."...

When Carney starts blithering about immigration and the rights foreigners should have to come to North America to seek better lives, etc... Trump just has to get a few folks to go onto Fox to speak to "Canadas policy on immigration isn't aligned with ours. we share a 5500 mile border with them.. we cant allow them to continue to take advantage of the US, not secure their borders, and have people using Canada as a crossing point.. Mexico is now doing their part.. Canada refuses to do theirs.. we need to sanction Canada.. tariffs are just the beginning..."..

After the last 4 years of southern border crisis, it will be easy to get everyone on the right and the center and even a lot of left leaners to get on board... No one wants a Northern Border Crisis (whether its real or not really wont matter.. its FAR too much of a hot and sensitive topic in the US right now.. if there is any potential for it to ever be real, that's enough...)...

He'll also play the Carney-China card to its full value (most Americans.. both left and right, understand the threat that China is to the US economically, militarily, socially, etc)..

He'll spend the next month or two painting Carney (and Canada) as a bunch of extreme, California-esque liberals that also love China and that have put themselves on a path of self destruction (much like California) with their social policies, lack of military capability, and lack of desire to change anything about it (proven by yet another far left liberal coming into office after Trudeau failed miserably the entire time he sat on the throne)..

At that point it wont matter how negotiations with Canada go.. If Canada capitulates, Trump does a victory dance and tells everyone around the world how brilliant his plan was... If Canada holds fast, Trump tells the world "see.. I told you we want nothing to do with those Chinese loving, whacko liberal Canadians.. they're not a good friend or partner anyway.. so who cares about the tariffs"....

He cant really take that approach with Polievre..


This isn't about Trump wanting to sit at a table with someone that has similar values to try to find some common ground and come up with a result that best suits both nations..

This is about Trump wanting to "win".. With Carney its a "win" no matter how things go.. With Polievre its only a win if we come to a reasonable agreement that's in the middle..
 
Blairs think tank issued a very negative statement on this plan zero shit in UK...now for him as a useless labour ex pm who caused lot of the illegal immigrants fkup , along with multitude of other shit to come out with this is major embarrassment for these labour muppets and starmer..don't want to insult muppets....

 
Trump is a showman.. and Carney is easy to make a "show" of...

Carney embraces China.. Trump hates China..

Carney is all about climate change and having a balanced carbon policy.. Trump thinks everything remotely related to this is hogwash.. Carney has gone so far to say he plans on putting into place a mechanism that implements tariffs on countries that have weaker carbon rules than Canada.. that puts Trump in a HUGE position of leverage when discussing US tariffs against Canadian products..

Carney loves "liberal" immigration policies.. Trump clearly hates open borders and liberal immigration policy..

The list goes on and on and on regarding their stark differences.. Im not sure if they agree on anything at all when it comes to the fundamentals of the primary fiscal or social issues circling the globe today..

Which makes Carney (and Canada) an easy target..

Its not going to be hard to get MAGA, or even the centrists on board with Trump tariff policy toward Carney... when Carney starts bitching about "new tariffs".. all Trump has to do is say "yeah... that carbon tariff you said you're going to implement...lets talk about that for a minute..."...

When Carney starts blithering about immigration and the rights foreigners should have to come to North America to seek better lives, etc... Trump just has to get a few folks to go onto Fox to speak to "Canadas policy on immigration isn't aligned with ours. we share a 5500 mile border with them.. we cant allow them to continue to take advantage of the US, not secure their borders, and have people using Canada as a crossing point.. Mexico is now doing their part.. Canada refuses to do theirs.. we need to sanction Canada.. tariffs are just the beginning..."..

After the last 4 years of southern border crisis, it will be easy to get everyone on the right and the center and even a lot of left leaners to get on board... No one wants a Northern Border Crisis (whether its real or not really wont matter.. its FAR too much of a hot and sensitive topic in the US right now.. if there is any potential for it to ever be real, that's enough...)...

He'll also play the Carney-China card to its full value (most Americans.. both left and right, understand the threat that China is to the US economically, militarily, socially, etc)..

He'll spend the next month or two painting Carney (and Canada) as a bunch of extreme, California-esque liberals that also love China and that have put themselves on a path of self destruction (much like California) with their social policies, lack of military capability, and lack of desire to change anything about it (proven by yet another far left liberal coming into office after Trudeau failed miserably the entire time he sat on the throne)..

At that point it wont matter how negotiations with Canada go.. If Canada capitulates, Trump does a victory dance and tells everyone around the world how brilliant his plan was... If Canada holds fast, Trump tells the world "see.. I told you we want nothing to do with those Chinese loving, whacko liberal Canadians.. they're not a good friend or partner anyway.. so who cares about the tariffs"....

He cant really take that approach with Polievre..


This isn't about Trump wanting to sit at a table with someone that has similar values to try to find some common ground and come up with a result that best suits both nations..

This is about Trump wanting to "win".. With Carney its a "win" no matter how things go.. With Polievre its only a win if we come to a reasonable agreement that's in the middle..
Carney is a newbie that will learn the hard way.
 
The average voter is low information as a rule.. It’s obviously a mix but trump has basically stated that it was his goal.. Just don’t see how it’s good for the US. Long term
Therein, lies the problem. For the most part, real journalism is dead. Everyone across the globe needs to start thinking for themselves, instead of allowing themselves to be manipulated by a media outlet pushing a narrative and agenda for political reasons.
 
That is what she is supposed to do. I didn’t see you complaining when Sotomayor did the same thing on a few cases where she had a conflict of interest.
Conflict of interest because she knows a catholic educator? BFD, and I’d say the same thing about any of them, every one of them were asked during conformation hearings if they’d let their personal feelings influence their decision and every one of them said no….. they interpret the law, as simple as that.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
65,363
Messages
1,442,285
Members
135,697
Latest member
bongdasoorg2
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

'68boy wrote on Rare Breed's profile.
Wife and I will attend ah dinner in Nashville Friday night. Jay Sheets and wife Chris
crossfire3006 wrote on Hornedfrogbbq's profile.
An excellent AH member right here! I had a fantastic transaction with Hornedfrogbbq (I was the seller). His communication was first rate, payment was extremely fast, and I would have absolutely no reservations at all dealing with him again. Thank you, F!
Here we are, the last day of the show in Denver, it's been a good show but expecting a quiet day today. I will be back for-sure to do this show next year and maybe also do the one in Sacramento California.

On Monday I will be hitting the road driving from Denver and eventually make it down to Atlanta for the flight home.

its going to be a good year!
CraigV wrote on Rem280's profile.
Hi Rem280, Saw your post on getting selected for Idaho Elk. Do you have a zone(s) selected? I live in N Idaho, might be able to offer some ideas.

Cheers,

Craig
ghay wrote on Konrad.inc's profile.
Do you still have the Ruger 9.3x62?
 
Top