Politics

There is a rather huge difference and enormous leap in comparison between an anti-ship drone, cruise missile, or ballistic missile launched at a maneuvering target fifty plus miles offshore and a quad copter attacking a tank with four pounds of C4. Thank God we have the ability, the industrial expertise, and infrastructure to build the Aegis destroyers able to launch SM-2 and SM-6 missiles capable of bringing them down. Smaller more nimble contractors or great at components and one-offs, but have some serious difficulties (as in can’t) building large integrated systems of systems on ground, sea, or air platforms and hosting the production capacity to field them.
@Red Leg and @Altitude sickness thank you both for helping those of us without military experience or defense contracting experience know about these topics and challenges on the modern battlefield. It seems that things are changing at a fast pace. I hope our DOD and all the different companies cooperate to solve such complex issues and evolving needs. Perhaps the big companies will form partnerships with the smaller companies, where needed, to solve these challenges and deploy systems across the broad spectrum of fixed and mobile land-based, ocean-based and space-based platforms.
 
There are many electronic warfare systems (jammers...) developed and being developed to disable the guidance of drones. Much of it is proving successful so what't next in this 21st century arms race? Better guidance in the form of fiber optic cable up to 12 miles long!

This video is worth watching. This concept is proving effective in Ukraine.
 
@Red Leg how do you think South Korean military equipment stacks up on the modern battlefield? At this point any equipment is an improvement for Canada. Germany and France have also expressed interest in dealing with Canada but to my understanding South Korea is the only one to put in a bid. South Korea claims they can outfit the Canadian battalion in Latvia in as little as 12 months is that a realistic figure?
 
@Red Leg and @Altitude sickness thank you both for helping those of us without military experience or defense contracting experience know about these topics and challenges on the modern battlefield. It seems that things are changing at a fast pace. I hope our DOD and all the different companies cooperate to solve such complex issues and evolving needs. Perhaps the big companies will form partnerships with the smaller companies, where needed, to solve these challenges and deploy systems across the broad spectrum of fixed and mobile land-based, ocean-based and space-based platforms.
Absolutely. The large corporations tend to act as system integrators on major programs, partnering with smaller houses for key technologies. Let me give you a non-defense example so I don’t tread into a classified area. My old company, Northrop Grumman, won the prime contractor role to build the James Webb Space Telescope. As you might imagine, a host of different technologies went into the JWST, not all of which were core Northrop capabilities. What was core was the knowledge how to utilize and integrate different technologies to create a successful space vehicle for whatever purpose.

The primary subcontractors included Ball Aerospace who were experts on mirror technology, ATK (since acquired by Northrop) which builds fine control and support structures for optical mirrors, L3Harris for electronic integration, the University of Arizona for mirror analysis and testing, Geodetic Systems which specializes in orbital positioning, etc, etc. More than twenty-five direct subs participated as part of the bid team and many of them had subs on their team. The total industry team assembled by the prime entailed nearly a hundred different entities, many with unique technologies, and of course NASA.

Only three corporations attempted to bid the project, Northrop, TRW, and Ball Aerospace. Yes, Ball attempted to win prime (a real long shot for such a niche company) and were a member of the Northrop bid with their unique mirror technology.

I use this as an example to show how complex platforms (fighters, ships, tanks, and yes, swarms) require deep integration skills to bring the array of technologies together to make complex systems function.

The space swarm missile defense concept may very well prove a useful capability, but it will not be created by a startup in someone’s garage. It will be an extremely complex endeavor whatever new technologies are exploited. But a key technology may be provided by such a startup.
 
Last edited:
@Red Leg how do you think South Korean military equipment stacks up on the modern battlefield? At this point any equipment is an improvement for Canada. Germany and France have also expressed interest in dealing with Canada but to my understanding South Korea is the only one to put in a bid. South Korea claims they can outfit the Canadian battalion in Latvia in as little as 12 months is that a realistic figure?
Yes. They make a family of ground combat vehicles that are seemingly quite durable and user friendly. The tank looks like a three-quarter size M1 Abrams. You can google the specifications of it and the infantry fighting vehicles. To make that claim, I assume they have some recently retired ones sitting around for export. The trick will be interoperability with Canada’s current systems, the supply chain, and the unique maintenance requirement and infrastructure to support a completely new family of platforms.
 
Very informative and interesting. However, IMHO we need to continue to be on the OFFENSIVE and strike the manufacturing, storage and launch sites of our enemies' drones, ballistic and hypersonic missiles and transportation corridors whenever and as often as we can. Every other solutions to these threats are just defensive in nature and they never end and cost a FORTUNE over time. Again, just my laypersons humble opinion.
 
Tammy Bruce revealed that the Biden administration was keeping secret files on Americans that were considered a threat to the Democrat party and their agenda.
Doesn't surprise me at all.
 
How is this going to work?....this one to me is ridiculous

Why Mike, don’t you appreciate that it simply represents another perfect example of his deep understanding of tariffs and how they work?

In fairness, I suppose the physical property in a movie could be purchased (rarely - normally leased) from a source subject to a tariff. But shooting scenes abroad?

I suppose a movie produced abroad by a foreign company could be charged in some way to release it in the US? Or, perhaps it is possible he is again saying something nonsensical that actually is part of a deep strategy.
 
Last edited:
Why Mike, don’t you appreciate that it simply represents another perfect example of his deep understanding of tariffs and how they work?

In fairness, I suppose the physical property in a movie could be purchased (rarely - normally leased) from a source subject to a tariff. But shooting scenes abroad?

Oh yeah perfectly......then as you ssid shooting scenes etc abroad .....and usa film companies make/produce films outside usa.....or shoot parts outside usa....so :E Shrug:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
63,626
Messages
1,400,085
Members
125,699
Latest member
MazieArrin
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Screenshot 2025-10-09 at 7.53.47 AM.png
A two minute video I made of our recent Safari. I think it turned out well
Speedster wrote on Sue Tidwell's profile.
Just received your book. It will be a Christmas present from my wife. Looking forward to read it.
ftothfadd wrote on EuroOptic's profile.
Jake, Sorry to bug you again. I was wondering if you could share a. couple actual pics of this crossbow with me?

Xpedition Archery USED Scrapeline390X Sniper Gray Crossbow XACW1001 - Light Wear - Needs Bolt/Arrow Guide Spring UA5689​

If it is in a decent shape, would you be willing to sell it for $100 shipped? IS it missing the retention spring that goes over the bolt?
Thank you Ferenc
Hie guys. Where can a 16 year old get a job at a hunting outfitter whilst the boy studies for lph . If anyone has anything WhatsApp me on [redacted]
Montana Gun Man wrote on John P.'s profile.
Good morning John, I just read your setup procedure for the northstar duplicator ator. I found it very hand and I did learn some things. I have the same machine and I am having a problem i can not figure out and was hoping you could shed some light on the subject.
 
Top