2. Cape Grysbok, Eastern Cape, June 30, 2014
As things turned out, I didn’t get a chance at another of the Tiny Ten for three more years and three more safaris. But then I got two on one(ish) hunt.
I was hunting the Eastern Cape for a few days before heading to the Northern Cape, looking principally for Cape kudu and nyala. But a Cape grysbok was on the list. On my first night in camp (Bluecliff Safaris), with the hunt scheduled to start the next day, we went out to look around. John Tinley, again my PH, had a spotlight and thought we were in a good area. He wasn’t wrong - we saw a number of grysbok, but none he could positively identify as male before they ran off . . . until one decided to watch us for a moment too long. I had been looking through the scope at any eyes John found with the flashlight, ready to shoot if he gave me the word. You really don’t get much time as a rule, so you can’t wait for the OK to try to find the grysbok. This isn’t an animal that is blinded by light and just sits there.
On this occasion, John said “shoot” and I did, within less than a second, at what seemed like 75 yards or so. I was using a .300 Win Mag so I lost the sight picture in the recoil. To my relief John said he was down. It took us a few minutes to find him - things always look different from different vantage points in the dark - but there he was.
The Cape grysbok is, as I noted, in the same genus as the steenbok. Unlike the steenbok though, which is sandy brown with some white, the grysboks have a reddish coat interspaced with white hairs, giving them a “grizzled” appearance. The nose area and the ears will typically be whiteish.
Cape grysbok have a pretty limited range - the coastal areas of the Eastern Cape and the Western Cape, so the very southern tip of South Africa. The Cape grysbok stands about 21” tall at the shoulder, and weighs in the area of 20 lbs, so a bit smaller than the steenbok. Only the males have horns, and they’re typically in the area of 3” or so. The world record in the SCI book is about 13”, which is, of course, the length of both horns plus the width of the bases, so probably about 5” horns.
I have to believe that most of the animals in the record book were 'lucky shots.' By that I mean the hunter didn't go out to get a record book specimen - but rather, went out for a grysbok and ended up with a record book specimen. Having said that, I might be doing someone out there a dis-service - there may well be someone who has had the patience (and spotting/quick shooting ability) to look over multiple specimens until they found a record book example . . . but given how these are shot, that seems unlikely in the extreme to me. Happy to be proved wrong though!
Like the steenbok the Cape grysbok are listed as of ‘least concern’ by the IUCN. That doesn’t mean they’re easy to find. Some people have managed to shoot one during daylight hours, but they’re mainly nocturnal, so unless you’re prepared to hunt at night with a flashlight, and with a PH who can make pretty much an instant assessment of whether the eyes are a shootable specimen, you could be waiting a long time for one of these little guys.
Apologies for the face. My kids made me promise . . .