JG26Irish_2
AH enthusiast
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2023
- Messages
- 365
- Reaction score
- 964
- Location
- United States
- Media
- 4
- Member of
- Bluegrass Safari Club, SCI
- Hunted
- RSA-Limpopo, KY, WV, TN, ND, SD, NM
That was THE video that I talked about. They waited soooo long after the bull rose to its feet before taking the 1st shot with the 600NE. I think the range on the first two shots was 20-30y at most.
It seemed that the hunter had froze until Mark told him to shoot. Up to that point, he had not even shouldered his weapon. Not sure what he was waiting for? Then when told, he threw up the rifle very fast and spooked the bull which moved as he shot. I felt that the hunter rushed the 1st shot and the 2nd shot and then fumbled around too long to effectively take a 3rd shot. I do not want to be too critical as I was not there and things happen.
Regarding the issue of hydrostatic shock? I have seen little evidence that the "shock" effect from shooting a large animal does any serious permanent damage to the body. Once I shot a deer with a 130g Nosler ballistic tip from a 270 at close range (40y). A frontal shot that I rushed and hit high and left and the bullet hit the shoulder and skimmed outside the top of the ribs and destroyed a 6" diameter portion of the back straps. A chunk entered the ribs and ruptured one lung which proved fatal. That is the only time I saw a devastating effect like that.
Last year, I shot a buck with a 150g Fed bonded 7mm Mag at 125y with a broadside shot. This was a pass thru. Hit both lungs and top of heart. Made a 2" wound in the top of heart and burst both lungs but the exit wound was only about 2" and not that impressive. Results however, were quite impressive as the buck dropped in its tracks, attempted to get up but was unable and I hit it with a 2nd shot to end it. If a 3000fps + mag does not cause hydrostatic shock, then few others will.
The year prior, I shot a buck with my 375HH using a 250g TBBC. Result was a dead deer but the internal damage was no worse than my 270 or 7mm mag. In fact, I wondered if the bullet had expanded at all. Still, all three of these example bucks now hang on my wall in a place of honor. Correction, two are on the wall. The 3rd is still at the taxidermist.
It seemed that the hunter had froze until Mark told him to shoot. Up to that point, he had not even shouldered his weapon. Not sure what he was waiting for? Then when told, he threw up the rifle very fast and spooked the bull which moved as he shot. I felt that the hunter rushed the 1st shot and the 2nd shot and then fumbled around too long to effectively take a 3rd shot. I do not want to be too critical as I was not there and things happen.
Regarding the issue of hydrostatic shock? I have seen little evidence that the "shock" effect from shooting a large animal does any serious permanent damage to the body. Once I shot a deer with a 130g Nosler ballistic tip from a 270 at close range (40y). A frontal shot that I rushed and hit high and left and the bullet hit the shoulder and skimmed outside the top of the ribs and destroyed a 6" diameter portion of the back straps. A chunk entered the ribs and ruptured one lung which proved fatal. That is the only time I saw a devastating effect like that.
Last year, I shot a buck with a 150g Fed bonded 7mm Mag at 125y with a broadside shot. This was a pass thru. Hit both lungs and top of heart. Made a 2" wound in the top of heart and burst both lungs but the exit wound was only about 2" and not that impressive. Results however, were quite impressive as the buck dropped in its tracks, attempted to get up but was unable and I hit it with a 2nd shot to end it. If a 3000fps + mag does not cause hydrostatic shock, then few others will.
The year prior, I shot a buck with my 375HH using a 250g TBBC. Result was a dead deer but the internal damage was no worse than my 270 or 7mm mag. In fact, I wondered if the bullet had expanded at all. Still, all three of these example bucks now hang on my wall in a place of honor. Correction, two are on the wall. The 3rd is still at the taxidermist.