Ample evidence against ivermectin too: including interviews from educated people. You can find information to suppport whatever opinion you chose.
Exactly this.With all due respect, the info links you provided from these various agenda-driven organizations are not evidence. They are opinions that are not substantiated by any data or peer reviewed studies as are the now multitude of studies that show the efficacy of ivermectin WHEN USED CORRECTLY within the therapeutic regiments as outlined in the various clinical studies.
It's very important to read carefully and interpret the propaganda of these cited sources. As @sgt_zim accurately stated, the CDC, FDA, NIH, and WHO have about as much credibility as CNN. None of these sources cite statistical data to prove that ivermectin is either ineffective against Covid or dangerous. The outrageous irony here is that these various organizations have discounted the clinical studies of ivermectin in large part because they are foreign, yet nearly all of the ridiculous mandates imposed on the American public over the last 18 months has been based on foreign data.
The warnings they cite come from possible side effects produced from potential overdoses and misuse of the drug. I got a newsflash for you... If somebody takes a horse dose of aspirin they are going to have adverse side affects that may result with them in the hospital.
That table is saying it is under investigation and how it is generally being used in clinical trials. It does not take a position on efficacy either way.Not sure what the controversy is. The NIH listed ivermectin (among others) as a therapeutic for CV as far back as July.
Straight from the horse’s mouth:
Review this table to learn about the characteristics of drugs under study for the treatment of COVID-19.www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov
I find it interesting how many unvaccinated patients are in our ICUs. The medical establishment is peddling nonsense and are part of a vast conspiracy when it comes to the vaccine but once they are on death's door, all of a sudden we know what we are doing?I’ve had 9 patients die over the past two days secondary to Covid. The answer is to get vaccinated. It may not be the popular opinion but it’s the truth. Monoclonal antibodies, ivermectin, Remdesivir, or Baricitinib are not the answer. It makes no sense for people to die for something that’s largely preventable.
Ivermectin does not work for Covid regardless of what politically motivated person tells you otherwise. Period. If you have taken ivermectin as precaution or treatment and you didn't get sick or got less sick, that was going to happen either way. Literally there are no benefits, only potential negative effects - including death.
Absolutely, unequivocally, laughably false.Literally there are no benefits, only potential negative effects - including death.
That table is saying it is under investigation and how it is generally being used in clinical trials. It does not take a position on efficacy either way.
+1If you truly cared about preventable deaths, I would think that you would be in favor of utilizing any and all available means to do so. The saddest and most outrageous part of this entire fiasco is the fact that we actually could have saved tens of thousands of lives if this disease had not been exploited for a political weapon from the beginning. Viable, effective treatments and therapies for Covid have been and continue to be falsely vilified and mocked by so-called "experts" and the MSM idiots with political agendas. These are the people who have real blood on their hands, and they should be ashamed of themselves. Actually, they should be charged with crimes, but of course that will never happen.
Ivermectin won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2015 for its effectiveness in HUMANS! The test Fauci did to discredit it was over seas and was given starting at 10X the dose then increased!Absolutely, unequivocally, laughably false.
did you happen to watch either of the videos I posted? Or listen to the podcast that @Philip Glass posted?
as per usual, one of us is playing politics and isn't even aware of it, while accusing the other side of the very thing he's doing.
There is zero risk of death from ivermectin. Zero. Zilch. Nada. It has been given safely to humans since ~1980, and I've never heard of somebody getting toxic on it. Literally billions of doses of ivermectin have been given to humans in the last 40 years.
You seem to be informed by the liars and morons on the lobotomy box. I'd suggest you'll find real news elsewhere.
You're gonna find out one of these days, hopefully at minimal cost, that lying is stock-in-trade for the Blue Church.
yea your right l was quoting old data about the percentage of people being jabbed in India LOLI am not going to offer an opinion on the effectiveness of Ivermectin with respect to Covid per se, though I will absolutely agree that it is a safe medication.
But with respect to India we need to get those facts straight as well - 45% of their population has had at least one dose of the vaccine. I suspect it is fair to say that the vaccination effort has helped blunt their case count. That said, as of this morning, their seven-day average new case count is running roughly 39K a day. That case count is a 100k less than the US, and the Indian population is 4X larger - many of whom live in very dense population centers.
Something besides the vaccination effort has made a difference. I think a reasonable conclusion would be that India's aggressive use of therapeutics as both treatment and prophylaxis would be a logical place to start in determining what that difference may be.