Why is everyone hating on Tally rings? They seem to work well to me...
My experience with Talley rings is all positive, Use to have the fixed rings on all my rifles, now I have the QD rings on almost all my rifles. Never had an issue and when I have had questions about mounting or bought the wrong ring height their customer service has always been very helpful.
I find that the Talley QD rings are easier to adjust than the Warne. Maybe I'm just used to them. I have them on all of my big bores up to 505 Gibbs and never had any issues at all.My only issue is fiddling with the Tally qd levers. My Warne are easy to position correctly. My other issue I have stripped a couple hex heads removing and were originally properly torqued. Both of these could be my issues but never an issue with Warne. I have to say I prefer the looks and weight of my Tally rings.
I find that the Talley QD rings are easier to adjust than the Warne. Maybe I'm just used to them. I have them on all of my big bores up to 505 Gibbs and never had any issues at all.
Not sure who "everyone" is. I use Talleys for anything that I've purchased in the last 8 or 10 years. Prior to that was Leupold. the only feature that I don't care for on Talleys is that they are split vertically so the screws that tighten the rings to the scope and the screw that tightens the ring to the base can interfere with each other. But once everything is set, then it's just a matter of keeping the ring screws snug.Why is everyone hating on Tally rings?