deewayne2003
AH legend
Hello pot, my name is kettle!Trump reap what he sow..
Hello pot, my name is kettle!Trump reap what he sow..
Mark my word--that influx won't be the last wave coming. Better get a plan in place now.Yes danish politicians have frequently used immigrant problems in other countries as arguments for having even harder migration policies. But even before that argument was raised they allready had a much harder stance on migration then other scandinavian countries. And thats what I ment, they took the lead and others have since followed, especially after the huge influx of refugees from Syria.
I read somewhere that France lost so many in those wars that the average height of a Frenchman dropped from 6'0" to 5'9"This is such a nonfactual statement. In what European conflict after 1900 has "Europe" started a war against a non-European foe? Excluding the Russo-Japanese War, in which we did not participate except as a peacemaker, such a condition has not happened. Therefore, I assume you are trying to say Europeans start wars among themselves in order to see with which powers the US allied itself? You do see how that makes no sense?
So, if I may make a second assumption, you must be talking about both WWI and WWII? We did eventually participate in both those wars, but it was because it was in our national interests to do so - it was never about altruism. One could even make the argument we entered when we did in both cases (late) to minimize our cost and maximize the benefits of victory.
To give some idea of how much Europe suffered in those wars, Britain endured 384,000 military deaths and 70,000 civilian deaths, or about 1% of a population of 47 million. The US suffered 418,000 deaths, the vast majority of whom were military representing only 0.3% of our population. Moreover, Around 150,000 of those US deaths occurred in the Pacific against Japan. British losses actually exceeded ours slightly in Europe (the UK also fought the Japanese alongside the US). Thus, Britain was hardly sitting around letting the US do the fighting. US losses in the First World War were far less proportionately to the UK and France.
I guess I won't include the either the Central Powers of WWI or Axis Powers of WWII, but they were European nations as well and had horrific losses compared to the US.
By the way, it is still in our national interests, particularly economic ones, that Europe remain a friendly market for goods and services moving in both directions. Hence, the enduring value of NATO - a treaty organization this nation created.
Perhaps you need to read your source more carefully.Read the FACE act. This has nothing to do with the 1. Amendment. It might help getting your facts straight before making statements, something you accuse Trump administration of doing.
![]()
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Well, imagine that,,,,,
![]()
Former CNN anchor Don Lemon appears in court after being arrested over protest at Minnesota church service
Don Lemon was taken into custody by federal agents in Los Angeles, where he had been covering the Grammy Awards, his attorney said.www.cbsnews.com
The candidate list on the ballot was long because everyone in his riding knew he was a dead letter and wanted a chance at filling that seat in Parliament. If he'd had any respectable rating among his constituents, the ballot list would have been very short.You know what? I don’t buy the long ballot as a valid excuse for anything. Are you telling me that PP’s constituents couldn’t figure out how to find his name in a list? C’mon.
My take on PP is that he is great at what he does, and that’s being an attack dog. But if he’s the one in power, that suddenly becomes a moot point. He would make a great second in command, but he’s not effective bringing people together beyond their hate of Trudeau. It will be interesting what comes from the leadership review.
I see. So your father would not have been able to find his preferred candidate on a list of names? He may not have been terribly literate but I really find that hard to believe.I bet it would be an issue for some voters , my late father for instance would have had difficulty with that much reading and it’s not legal to go behind the screen and help him. Maybe things are different were you are but a lot of the older generation here men especially didn’t have a lot of education.
I can't help but wonder: If things Trump says have a material effect on the outcome of an election, exactly how sovereign is the nation?You missed his point. No one argues the lunacy of Trudeau, but Trumps attack of Canada during their elections had a material effect on the outcome, swinging the results to the current incumbent, a very poor choice indeed.
Funny because it’s true!…. Yesterday I believe chinas market closed @$140+ on silver.Precious metals trading like crypto![]()

The candidate list was long because a political protest not because everyone thought they had a shot at the seat. Who paid for all of those independents to run and get there name on a ballot?The candidate list on the ballot was long because everyone in his riding knew he was a dead letter and wanted a chance at filling that seat in Parliament. If he'd had any respectable rating among his constituents, the ballot list would have been very short.
What is an accurate read on why DNI Tulsi Gabbard was in the Fulton County raid.
Foreign influence? Voting machine tampering from external forces ?
Or she just happened to be walking by.

Or maybe she’s like one of the astute members on AHF and feels compelled to lend her expertise on everything and all things, to the agency conducting the raid? Inquiring minds want to know……What is an accurate read on why DNI Tulsi Gabbard was in the Fulton County raid.
Foreign influence? Voting machine tampering from external forces ?
Or she just happened to be walking by.
Frostbite jr ?Or maybe she’s like one of the astute members on AHF and feels compelled to lend her expertise on everything and all things, to the agency conducting the raid? Inquiring minds want to know……
TwinsFrostbite jr ?
I don’t understand why the public doesn’t like PP. He is blunt, he says exactly what he believes. Over the last ten years his predictions have been spot on, to the point that the Liberals have adopted a bunch of his platform to salvage our economy. His personal history is humble and the left has nothing on him when it comes to immigration, gay marriage or abortion. He will be a completely transparent leader who is completely intolerant of people who don’t work for Canada. That is why he hated Trudeau so much and he was overt in that disdain.You know what? I don’t buy the long ballot as a valid excuse for anything. Are you telling me that PP’s constituents couldn’t figure out how to find his name in a list? C’mon.
My take on PP is that he is great at what he does, and that’s being an attack dog. But if he’s the one in power, that suddenly becomes a moot point. He would make a great second in command, but he’s not effective bringing people together beyond their hate of Trudeau. It will be interesting what comes from the leadership review.