Politics

Yup but one of the ones interviewed said because of this they should strengthen their ties with China.....if you read comments after some of the articles about this in papers this side of the water, in various African countries there are quite a few saying the same thing.....which I don't find that great...
That would certainly be cutting off their nose to spite their face. Tonga has 100k people in it and the Chinese are not famous for their good treatment of ethnic minorities. Becoming China’s Hawaii would be the Acme of foolishness especially when we have them dead to rights on their visa abuses. Chinese ties come with Chinese strings attached.

My guess is they’ll make their stink but keep things the relatively unchanged. Having their visa situation tightened up is really a minor inconvenience in the scheme of things and is likely to change back as quickly as it came about, either in this administration or the next.
 
Makes my skin crawl....

1767219984157.jpg
 
I think all of that is largely true. What worries me is the apparent belief in this administration that a peace that rewards Russian aggression is somehow in the interests of our country and our allies.

What has Russia actually taken as a reward up to this point? We give Ukraine weaponry and other resources but we haven't actually given Russia anything have we? Correct me if I'm wrong. There have been some things discussed and supposedly offered and hashed out but no actual deals and I don't think anyone is actually surprised when nothing comes of it. I don't buy the narrative that we've emboldened Putin either. That guy isn't going to give a damn regardless. He'll always take credit and avoid responsibility to suit his needs. The war just keeps getting prolonged and Russia bleeds human and technical assets by the day which is definitely in our favor. In that regard I'm not saying that this is definitely all in the grand plan, but if it were and our goal was to weaken Russia as much as possible or to create some kind of coup or citizen uprising but at the same time not backing Putin in into too much a nuclear corner by seeming somewhat friendly and sympathetic...


As far as Putin himself goes and the commentary of our enemies being three moves ahead, I think it's easy for these enemies to seem three steps ahead when their leaders have zero regard for anyone, up to and including their own citizens. There's no limit or boundaries to what you can do at that point. Need more men for the meat grinder? Sure, throw them in. The elites will happily sit down for a luxury four course meal that same night. I'm also not impressed by Russia starting a war with a country next door. It takes zero technical genius to do such a thing, especially when you're a nuclear power.
 
What has Russia actually taken as a reward up to this point? We give Ukraine weaponry and other resources but we haven't actually given Russia anything have we? Correct me if I'm wrong. There have been some things discussed and supposedly offered and hashed out but no actual deals and I don't think anyone is actually surprised when nothing comes of it. I don't buy the narrative that we've emboldened Putin either. That guy isn't going to give a damn regardless. He'll always take credit and avoid responsibility to suit his needs. The war just keeps getting prolonged and Russia bleeds human and technical assets by the day which is definitely in our favor. In that regard I'm not saying that this is definitely all in the grand plan, but if it were and our goal was to weaken Russia as much as possible or to create some kind of coup or citizen uprising but at the same time not backing Putin in into too much a nuclear corner by seeming somewhat friendly and sympathetic...


As far as Putin himself goes and the commentary of our enemies being three moves ahead, I think it's easy for these enemies to seem three steps ahead when their leaders have zero regard for anyone, up to and including their own citizens. There's no limit or boundaries to what you can do at that point. Need more men for the meat grinder? Sure, throw them in. The elites will happily sit down for a luxury four course meal that same night. I'm also not impressed by Russia starting a war with a country next door. It takes zero technical genius to do such a thing, especially when you're a nuclear power.
I am not sure what you wrote had to do with the concern I expressed.

Thus far Russia has seized approximately 20% of a sovereign country and inflicted several hundred thousand military and civilian casualties on a people whose only crime was wanting to chart a democratic future aligned with Western Europe.

Every utterance by this administration to date has either been certifiably insane - Ukraine shouldn’t have started a war it couldn’t win - or sympathetic to Russia’s ridiculous narrative that it’s brutal invasion was somehow defensive. As an American and professional who devoted his life to the defense of our nation’s national interests, it frankly shames me.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure what you wrote had to do with the concern I expressed.

You and others keep talking about rewarding Putin. How exactly has he been rewarded up to this point? How dovwe know that all of this hasn't just been a strategy to prolong the war to weaken Russia?
 
I am not sure what you wrote had to do with the concern I expressed.

Thus far Russia has seized approximately 20% of a sovereign country and inflicted several hundred thousand military and civilian casualties on a people whose only crime was wanting to chart a democratic future aligned with Western Europe.

Every utterance by this administration to date has either been certifiably insane - Ukraine shouldn’t have started a war it couldn’t win - or sympathetic to Russia’s ridiculous narrative that it’s brutal invasion was somehow defensive. As an American and professional who devoted his life to the defense of our nation’s national interests, it frankly shames me.

Russia siezed 20% of a non NATO country with questionable intentions a long time ago in an invasion that we couldn't stop. Since then I've seen a WW1 style stalemate, America has give every kind of weaponry and help to Ukraine and nothing to Russia, despite any words that may have shamed you. Russia has been significantly weakened in every way possible and in a way that they may never recover from.
 
Russia siezed 20% of a non NATO country with questionable intentions a long time ago in an invasion that we couldn't stop. Since then I've seen a WW1 style stalemate, America has give every kind of weaponry and help to Ukraine and nothing to Russia, despite any words that may have shamed you. Russia has been significantly weakened in every way possible and in a way that they may never recover from.
We have indeed given Ukraine just enough not to be defeated. For instance we gave them exactly 31 M1 tanks - we have over Three thousand in storage - hardly providing "every kind of weaponry." However, I believe the "Biden strategy" was hardly Machiavellian, but rather simple fecklessness out some sort of fear they would be faced with some form of retaliation that would be difficult to manage. After all, the war effort was led by Jake Sullivan - a man with zero military or diplomatic experience (rather like Trump's chief negotiator). However, If the Biden administration's actual strategy was to prolong a conflict using the blood and hopes of Ukrainians as munitions, then I find that utterly reprehensible.

I find the blame Ukraine crowd who has assumed control of this country's strategic engagement equally reprehensible and perhaps even worse. They, from our president on down and abetted by his allies in social media like Tucker Carlson, simply lie while the administration's supporters blindly applaud. This war is not the fault of Ukraine. The blame America crowd on the right (how that worm has turned) is also loudly pointing fingers, but this war was not caused by Zelensky, or the Ukrainian people, or the CIA, or any other convenient imagined perpetrator - just Putin.

The surest way to conclude this conflict in a manner that is in our national interests is to provide Ukraine with the means to make it impossible for Russia to achieve its strategic goals. The vast majority of that materiel is sitting in this country in warehouses - materiel our military will never use. I suspect merely turning on that tap would be enough to force the Russians into a very prompt accommodation to try and hang on to what they currently occupy.

Sadly, I do not believe this administration has a perception of a stable, democratic Europe as a key partner - seemingly preferring instead the vague assurances of the KGB thug cowering in Moscow.
 
Last edited:
That would certainly be cutting off their nose to spite their face. Tonga has 100k people in it and the Chinese are not famous for their good treatment of ethnic minorities. Becoming China’s Hawaii would be the Acme of foolishness especially when we have them dead to rights on their visa abuses. Chinese ties come with Chinese strings attached.

My guess is they’ll make their stink but keep things the relatively unchanged. Having their visa situation tightened up is really a minor inconvenience in the scheme of things and is likely to change back as quickly as it came about, either in this administration or the next.

I wasn't just referencing tonga.....you are in usa...I am in the arena of people who are pissed off....so a shit load of people starting to think .. even if they didn't before...maybe China is better...how in the long term is that good for usa?.....I am fkd off with this visa shit.....my wife has had 2 or 3 three year visitor visas...but now I have to fkn put a ludicrous deposit on so she can visit....and myself who have been coming to usa since 1990 when I had an unlimited entry visitor visa now have to give all that bullshit info...sorry not a fkn chance.....they also pissed off as the sent troops to Afghanistan to back up.....fk me the percentages used compared to visitors or even populations are a joke
 
I too am frustrated with many things coming from the Trump administration. However, could you imagine where we would be a under Harris/Walz administration?

While Im not pleased with Trump, I am forever grateful we are not living under the alternative.
 
The surest way to conclude this conflict in a manner that is in our national interests is to provide Ukraine with the means to make it impossible for Russia to achieve its strategic goals. The vast majority of that materiel is sitting in this country in warehouses - materiel our military will never use. I suspect merely turning on that tap would be enough to force the Russians into a very prompt accommodation to try and hang on to what they currently occupy.
Concur..

We don’t have to give them enough to “win” per se… just enough to ensure the Russians lose…

Don’t give them all 3000 M1’s… don’t put them in a position where they could march on Moscow or threaten Putin to the point he has cause to strike elsewhere…

But what about 300 M1’s? And the fuel and munitions to support them.. and maybe a handful of older patriot batteries.. and a hand full of capable surface to air missiles to ward off Russian air capability?

Enough to push the Russians out of Ukraine fairly decisively… but not enough to move more than a few miles into Russian homeland turf…

In the process the Russian military and economy would be further devastated.. and Ukraine would be restored…

Win - Win…

And then hold the Ukrainians accountable… in exchange we put monitors on the ground … and we let them know that we expect them to get their cyber criminals under control, or else… and oh, by the way, we’ll be extracting rare earth to pay for the stuff we provided you for the next few years (thereby not only securing it for ourselves.. but also denying it to the Russians and Chinese…

Second set of win - wins…

I’m sure I’m missing something…

But it all seems pretty reasonable and easy to me…
 
What has Russia actually taken as a reward up to this point? We give Ukraine weaponry and other resources but we haven't actually given Russia anything have we? Correct me if I'm wrong. There have been some things discussed and supposedly offered and hashed out but no actual deals and I don't think anyone is actually surprised when nothing comes of it. I don't buy the narrative that we've emboldened Putin either. That guy isn't going to give a damn regardless. He'll always take credit and avoid responsibility to suit his needs. The war just keeps getting prolonged and Russia bleeds human and technical assets by the day which is definitely in our favor. In that regard I'm not saying that this is definitely all in the grand plan, but if it were and our goal was to weaken Russia as much as possible or to create some kind of coup or citizen uprising but at the same time not backing Putin in into too much a nuclear corner by seeming somewhat friendly and sympathetic...


As far as Putin himself goes and the commentary of our enemies being three moves ahead, I think it's easy for these enemies to seem three steps ahead when their leaders have zero regard for anyone, up to and including their own citizens. There's no limit or boundaries to what you can do at that point. Need more men for the meat grinder? Sure, throw them in. The elites will happily sit down for a luxury four course meal that same night. I'm also not impressed by Russia starting a war with a country next door. It takes zero technical genius to do such a thing, especially when you're a nuclear power.

Don't understand...most of whst you said actually agrees that it emboldened putim.... :D Beers:
 
We have indeed given Ukraine just enough not to be defeated. For instance we gave them exactly 31 M1 tanks - we have over Three thousand in storage - hardly providing "every kind of weaponry." However, I believe the "Biden strategy" was hardly Machiavellian, but rather simple fecklessness out some sort of fear they would be faced with some form of retaliation that would be difficult to manage. After all, the war effort was led by Jake Sullivan - a man with zero military or diplomatic experience (rather like Trump's chief negotiator). However, If the Biden administration's actual strategy was to prolong a conflict using the blood and hopes of Ukrainians as munitions, then I find that utterly reprehensible.

I find the blame Ukraine crowd who has assumed control of this country's strategic engagement equally reprehensible and perhaps even worse. They, from our president on down and abetted by his allies in social media like Tucker Carlson, simply lie while the administration's supporters blindly applaud. This war is not the fault of Ukraine. The blame America crowd on the right (how that worm has turned) is also loudly pointing fingers, but this war was not caused by Zelensky, or the Ukrainian people, or the CIA, or any other convenient imagined perpetrator - just Putin.

The surest way to conclude this conflict in a manner that is in our national interests is to provide Ukraine with the means to make it impossible for Russia to achieve its strategic goals. The vast majority of that materiel is sitting in this country in warehouses - materiel our military will never use. I suspect merely turning on that tap would be enough to force the Russians into a very prompt accommodation to try and hang on to what they currently occupy.

Sadly, I do not believe this administration has a perception of a stable, democratic Europe as a key partner - seemingly preferring instead the vague assurances of the KGB thug cowering in Moscow.

Give up joe ....you beating your head against a granite monolith......:E Shrug::D Beers:
 
Concur..

We don’t have to give them enough to “win” per se… just enough to ensure the Russians lose…

Don’t give them all 3000 M1’s… don’t put them in a position where they could march on Moscow or threaten Putin to the point he has cause to strike elsewhere…

But what about 300 M1’s? And the fuel and munitions to support them.. and maybe a handful of older patriot batteries.. and a hand full of capable surface to air missiles to ward off Russian air capability?

Enough to push the Russians out of Ukraine fairly decisively… but not enough to move more than a few miles into Russian homeland turf…

In the process the Russian military and economy would be further devastated.. and Ukraine would be restored…

Win - Win…

And then hold the Ukrainians accountable… in exchange we put monitors on the ground … and we let them know that we expect them to get their cyber criminals under control, or else… and oh, by the way, we’ll be extracting rare earth to pay for the stuff we provided you for the next few years (thereby not only securing it for ourselves.. but also denying it to the Russians and Chinese…

Second set of win - wins…

I’m sure I’m missing something…

But it all seems pretty reasonable and easy to me…

Stop being so sensible...but make it 500 you cheap skate..they not been doing that well....so a few spares be good :D Beers:
 
You seem to be typing while drunk
Well… it is a little after midnight on New Year’s Eve in Zambia :D
 

Forum statistics

Threads
65,138
Messages
1,436,585
Members
134,577
Latest member
Matian81
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

TakeMeLord wrote on Hunt anything's profile.
Suppressor Question.. you shot a waterbuck, followed vapor trail.
May I ask: Brand of Suppressor? Caliber of rifle
AND
Dis airport secutity give you any hassles about the silencer? Thanks, Dale
RolandtheHeadless wrote on intj's profile.
Hi. Will you take $90 including shipping for the 28 Nosler brass?

Jim
Mauser3000 wrote on HBartley's profile.
Hello,

I saw your post selling left hand rifles. Do you have any additional pics of the .416 Rem mag?

Thank you.

-Nathan
Mauser3000 wrote on gbflyer's profile.
Hello, I saw your post selling left hand rifles. Do you have any other left hand rifles you may let go of? Also can you send a few additional pics of Borden rifle?

Thank you.

-Nathan
 
Top