BSO Dave
AH elite
Your premise seems to be focused on cost. Yes, a suit from Marks & Spenser or Walmart is going to cost a lot less than the more upscale stores let alone bespoke tailors. But, then you will have to settle for cheaper materials and a not perfect fit.
If all one can afford is RSA, then go for it. When Joe Average is bragging about his lion hunt at home his audience is not going to know that the lion was raised in a pen and let out for "hunting" a few days earlier.
Cost is only one of the factors that should be considered. Also, if one is flexible with their time there are many reduced cost end-of-the-season or cancellation hunts that pop-up in "wild Africa".
And I have nothing against RSA hunting as I also have nothing against Walmart. They fill the needs of a large range of clientele. I just would not call it the best.
You just can't help yourself can you? LOL..!
Comparing an RSA plainsgame hunt to a cheap suit is certainly going to endear you to the many sponsors of this site who pay thousands of dollars to market their "cheap suit" African experiences here..
And once again, you never miss an opportunity to bring CBL hunting into a conversation where it did not exist, or have any relevance.. Please explain to all of us how exactly does CBL hunting fit into this discussion..? On second thought please don't.. Nobody cares..
Congratulations! You have managed to not only insult the vast majority of outfitters here on this site, but also the vast majority of their past clients and prospective clients by comparing them to Walmart shoppers. It seems that you and HRC have the same gift for knowing your audience.. LOL.. Your condescension is truly laughable! Speaking on behalf of the deplorables here on this site, thank you for continuing to provide us with such entertainment..
One may disagree with @Tanks observations about hunting Africa, but his are indeed informed opinions.
Defending this guy is the hill you want to die on? You can have informed opinions and present them in such a way that is not obviously condescending, pompous, and arrogant. Please re-read his quote above that is just one of the many I have referenced making my point. You can go back to dozens of threads and scores of posts where he does this regularly..
That's the problem with many "informed" individuals is that they believed they are so informed, theirs is the only opinion that applies.. In my view, that pomposity nullifies most, if not all of the credibility that would have otherwise have been appreciated here by many..
Last edited: