Discussion in 'General Chat' started by gizmo, Feb 21, 2018.
WANNEER MAG EK SKIET?
(Vanaf Jonathan Wright, GOSA : Gun Owners South Africa) (vertaal
Daar is letterlik net 3 vereistes vir die gebruik van geweld om jou lewe te verdedig:
1. Is my lewe in gevaar of ervaar jy ten minste die gevaar as sodanig ernstig?
2. Is hierdie gevaar 'n doodelike bedreiging?
3. Is hierdie gevaar onwettig?
Dis letterlik al! Hou op met teoretiese gekibbel!
There are literally only three requirements for the use of force to defend your life or a victims life:
1. Is your life in danger, or do you genuinely perceive such a danger at the least?
2. Is this danger imminent?
3. Is this danger unlawful?
That's literally it! Stop with all the tailor made theoretical talk!
As a Jewish man, I am most afraid of "lawful" danger.
Lawful Danger is clearly the most dangerous. History has shown that the current Divide & Conquer practice of some politicians is the first step to making theft and injury to the selected group legal; followed by selection of the next group. It's often said in case of attack by a bear you don't need to run fast, just faster than the slowest one; but what isn't said is that the bear keeps coming and before long, you are the slowest one, even if you were the fastest one.
That's the most beautiful AR15 assault pistol once EveR seen!
You cant fix stupid
I can’t believe they re-elect this POS in Houston religiously!
You've driven through the 5th ward....you can believe it!
Separate names with a comma.