Honestly the closest I will probably have a chance at dg
Yeah. Doesnt go near as deep as a wfn/lfn solid and doesnt do near as much damage as an aframe or barnes so i dont use em. Not great at anything but ok at penetration and damage but it is neat to see the x shaped cut in the tissue.
One was but we were in an area that would make recovery very very difficult. It was a very very aggressive old bull. We were on a rock he couldnt get up to and he ran up and was putting his head on the rock trying to get at us then ran off. I shot him about 400 yards further down the path where it opened up and was accessible. The zulu tracker had my video cam and somehow instead of hitting record he got it into still mode and just snapped a pic before he made it onto the rock/boulder. This is it.
That may be true, but I'm not going to try it!
www.facebook.com
That bear would have been no match for my light sabre.In the video in the link below is a hunter charged by a brown bear. I know this is the Africa Hunting forum but, it's about the benefits of using a handgun where a rifle might not be maneuverable/fast enough for quick follow up shots. In the situation below is where I'd prefer a powerful double-action revolver...
It looks like the hunter was using a lever guide-gun and still was not fast enough, only got off one shot. When knocked to the ground is where the hand-gun has the benefits over a rifle that turns into a broom stick...
771K views · 2.9K reactions | I’m confuse was that a bear or dog. I said he needs a sidearm if he’s goings bear hunter. I always telll people to proceed with caution what would you do. Me personally I would have had a LMG PERSONALLY #humor #bear #man
I’m confuse was that a bear or dog. I said he needs a sidearm if he’s goings bear hunter. I always telll people to proceed with caution what would you do. Me personally I would have had a LMG...
Why does the handgun have to be in the holster? Why not in one's hand? In the video above it looks like the hunter might have been stalking the bear or heard it was there before it charged...
Like I said; I’d use my light saber.
www.ultimatesportsmen.com
Wrong. It would have been better for him to have had a green light Sabre. Not one of those POS blue ones made by Browning. A green one made by Winchester with controlled light feed. Even better still, a purple one made by Rigby.Another story where a bolt-action rifle did not save a man's life and was killed by a brown bear. He might have had a slightly better chance of surviving if he had a handgun on him with hard casts...
True Life Fishing and Hunting Stories - Bear Attack
True life fishing and hunting stories from Tales of The Ultimate Sportsmen - Bear Attack
No, rifles are not CQB weapons at point blank range, they have major disadvantages in close proximity when dealing with speed and maneuverability. Double barrels are better than bolt-actions for that but, you're still swinging around a long club...
Are any of those available with suppressors? Those seem to be all the rage these days.
Why would the handgun not be in the holster? Under any circumstance short of the animal actually being on top of the hunter, the rifle will always be better. Well, one time I did have to crawl into a thick patch of chaparral to finish a hog with my .357, but if it had been a seriously dangerous animal (the pig was only about 30 pounds) I would not have been crawling on my belly to find him.
There are many people who hunt with handguns as their primary weapon and walk with it in their hand. Plenty of videos online of hunters who are approaching a kill or gut pile with their handguns in their hand.
Exactly. I think this the forum with both a thread about why the 375 isn’t sufficient for dangerous game, and how a handgun is sufficient to stop a charge. Good times.
