9.3 partition performance

foxtrot1

AH member
Joined
Jan 23, 2023
Messages
44
Reaction score
103
Media
1
285 grain 9.3 nosler partition recovered from 130(ish) lb wild pig. From my 9.3x57 @2050 fps. Impact was at 10 yards, head on. Over 3' of penetration from skull to be recovered under the hide in a back leg.

I was testing these at lower velocities of the 9.3x57. Front core separated, as expected, with a 74% weight retention. Overall solid performance for an all around bullet.
 

Attachments

  • 20250525_170203.jpg
    20250525_170203.jpg
    398.2 KB · Views: 25
  • 20250525_170259.jpg
    20250525_170259.jpg
    338 KB · Views: 26
  • 20250525_170555.jpg
    20250525_170555.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 21
Penetrated the skull and 3’ after expansion at 2,050fps; looks like textbook performance to me.

I often wonder why people belittle the partition for the head separation, when it’s designed to do that.
 
Designed for initial shock and expansion followed by good penetration. Exactly what John Nosler was looking for. They are a great game bullet. For really heavy animals I like the Swift A Frame, otherwise the Nosler Partition gets my vote.
 
Designed for initial shock and expansion followed by good penetration. Exactly what John Nosler was looking for. They are a great game bullet. For really heavy animals I like the Swift A Frame, otherwise the Nosler Partition gets my vote.
Agreed, and the A Frame is just a bonded partition.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
61,503
Messages
1,346,538
Members
115,877
Latest member
Sergiokic
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Dickhauterladung
2RECON wrote on Riflecrank's profile.
Hallo Ron, do you remember me? I´m Michael from Germany. We did some Wildcats on the .338 Lapua Case.
.375 i did, and a .500 and .510 you did.
Can you please contact me again (eMail please)

Best
Michael
 
Top