| |
|
Last edited by a moderator:
| |
|
Are they stopping transport as freight or checked baggage? I didn't have any problems bringing back a small crate of three plains game skulls as checked baggage on Swiss and Air Canada (except the crate and guns missed the plane back from Zurich).From the article:
Airlines, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, KLM, British Airways and Air France, now refuse to transport hunting trophies.
One has to wonder what would happen to Delta's ATL>JNB service if hunters stopped using it, as we probably should.
Based on the WSJ report this is now a new policy, and more than likely due to the optics of the Nov elections in the USA. There are a plethora of anti-hunting, anti-firearm rhetoric that is attached to many of the candidates who won elections. So, a sudden change in air travel policies is not surprising given past antics of corporations to align with the political views of which ever of the 2 party system that has gained "power" ....Are they stopping transport as freight or checked baggage? I didn't have any problems bringing back a small crate of three plains game skulls as checked baggage on Swiss and Air Canada (except the crate and guns missed the plane back from Zurich).
Perhaps the problem is too many hunters trying to bring back trophies as carryon? My taxidermist in Africa actually thought it was possible! Said they could rig up a soft bag that fit carryon dimensions. Of course it's not possible. My gemsbuck horns could easily have become deadly sabers during a flight.
Based on the WSJ report this is now a new policy, and more than likely due to the optics of the Nov elections in the USA. There are a plethora of anti-hunting, anti-firearm rhetoric that is attached to many of the candidates who won elections. So, a sudden change in air travel policies is not surprising given past antics of corporations to align with the political views of which ever of the 2 party system that has gained "power" ....
No… it’s Air FreightAre they stopping transport as freight or checked baggage? I didn't have any problems bringing back a small crate of three plains game skulls as checked baggage on Swiss and Air Canada (except the crate and guns missed the plane back from Zurich).
Perhaps the problem is too many hunters trying to bring back trophies as carryon? My taxidermist in Africa actually thought it was possible! Said they could rig up a soft bag that fit carryon dimensions. Of course it's not possible. My gemsbuck horns could easily have become deadly sabers during a flight.
Point taken, and I was being generous in assuming the article writer performed due diligence in compiling information. And all of it can be just wishful thinking of the anti- groups .... Despite, the cessation of transporting Big 5 is just another foreboding of things to come.I don't see any other "news" about delta stopping all hunting trophies except that report saying they are part of a group of airlines that won't ship hunting trophies.
If the goal of Delta was to look a certain way before elections, you'd think it would be publicized and not show up as an obscure mention after the elections already happened.
It's possible it is a new policy. However, I would think a more likely scenario is the writer confounded shipping big 5 trophies and shipping all hunting trophies. WSJ has also been pretty heavily left leaning from the vast majority of articles I have seen from them. So, I would also think it might be stated that way as a sort of confirmation bias by the author and to help bolster the appearance of support on the anti-hunting side of things.
Hopefully Delta has not stopped shipping all hunting trophies as they were generally cheaper than other airlines and the Atlanta hub was a benefit when bringing them back.
I was also told about a week ago that Turkish airlines stopped shipping trophies, despite the fact that they just shipped mine during the same time they supposedly weren't shipping any.
From the article : “Hunting an elephant in Zimbabwe can cost as much as $60,000, while a permit to shoot a buffalo is around $50,000 and an impala kill is priced at $20,000, according to wildlife authorities” . Damn , I guess I got a hell of a bargain on that buffalo and “impala kill” .
The article also says, "...Canada prohibit importation of African hunting trophies like heads and skins, and pressure is mounting in the U.K. and Germany to follow suit."
Canada often has more lax rules on African hunting trophies than the US.
So again, I wouldn't take everything written in this article as gospel.
The state of “journalism “ is embarrassingly pathetic these days .
Yes, I forwarded it to several non-hunting but open-minded friends.Yes, the subject article is technically inaccurate.
I was however impressed that a major newspaper published a pro-trophy hunting article. While not "hunting is great", the overall facts of African countries want trophy hunters to boost their economies. Additionally that countries with hunting have more animals than countries that banned hunting.
A non-hunter may read this and develop a more positive view on African trophy hunting.
Agreed -- I also think we should emphasize the point that this is the global north trying to control how the global south uses their natural resources. First of all it's true and second I think that's a line of argument that can help pull waverers to our side.@Mark A Ouellette, good point!
Delta stopped transporting Big-5 cargo way back before the mid-terms. Delta will transport any other animals that are not big 5. Their CEOs are all woke, told by a good friend who was a Delta Capt. and is now retired.
We as hunters should be the loudest voice, and as hunters we have the duty to educate those who don't know better. Show the pictures of people waiting to get some meat from the elephant taken, show pictures of their huts, show those who don't know how African live. Educate them. Oh, and if you have kids, take them hunting and pass along our passion, they are the future of hunting.
on related note ..... I have heard that there is some talk from the newly empowered on capital hill about ways to rein in the pro-outdoorsman stance of USFWS by shinking their budget and delaying disbursements of pre agreed funding. A consequence of this would be a dramatic slowdown in the case by case approval process needed for some big cats and elephant trophies. It is a credible (but speculative) argument. If you follow that line of reasoning a trophy legally hunted in 2027 like a late season ele and awaiting taxidermy and importation approval could be locked out of US- if the delay pushed the approvals till after nxt presidential election. any thoughts ?