Brent in Az
AH ambassador
Alabama, Florida, and Louisiana, have opened investigations into Fauci.
Like managing moose resource here is impossible because Natives can hunt anytime, any day, anywhere, and utilizing any method. Jacklighting from snow machines and ATVs is their preferred method. The notion that they are inherent conservationist in union with Mother Earth blah blah blah is fiction. Read "Keepers of the Game" (by Whiteman as I recall - no pun). The HBC records are full of agents' lamentations over the wastefulness of their Native workers harvesting everything they could with no thought to conserving. Often resulted in HBC having to scrounge into their own supplies to keep their labor supply from starving during winter. Needless to say, his book stirred up quite a storm. It was essentially banned from most Canadian history courses at our universities. Reverse racism at its best. Remake history. Kinda like what Trump is attempting to do with the National Parks.
If this “band” wins in court the North Atlantic will be the maritime reincarnation of the Wild West. The commercial fisherman will just be able to self identify as indigenous and fish year round. There will be no need for seasons anymore.
What was it foghorn leghorn used to say “luckily I keep my feathers numbered for just such an occasion”
Like managing moose resource here is impossible because Natives can hunt anytime, any day, anywhere, and utilizing any method. Jacklighting from snow machines and ATVs is their preferred method. The notion that they are inherent conservationist in union with Mother Earth blah blah blah is fiction. Read "Keepers of the Game" (by Whiteman as I recall - no pun). The HBC records are full of agents' lamentations over the wastefulness of their Native workers harvesting everything they could with no thought to conserving. Often resulted in HBC having to scrounge into their own supplies to keep their labor supply from starving during winter. Needless to say, his book stirred up quite a storm. It was essentially banned from most Canadian history courses at our universities. Reverse racism at its best. Remake history. Kinda like what Trump is attempting to do with the National Parks.
Edit: Correction, "Keepers of the Game" author is Calvin Martin
Waste of resources. Fauci, regardless of what one thinks of him, was a Federal employee doing his job. Also, he was working in an advisory capacity and whatever decisions that were made by the Federal government in regard to mandates etc. we’re made by the executive branch.Alabama, Florida, and Louisiana, have opened investigations into Fauci.
Risky though. Cops show up and all they see is a firefight in progress. Which one with a gun do they shoot?
I hope crap if that were me, I'd be thinking about the people who are actively being shot at, not what might happen when the police get there.
Blue states have Done that to Trump and some of his supporters. New York, Georgia.....and they will continue to do it. Your argument is weak.Waste of resources. Fauci, regardless of what one thinks of him, was a Federal employee doing his job. Also, he was working in an advisory capacity and whatever decisions that were made by the Federal government in regard to mandates etc. we’re made by the executive branch.
States do not have jurisdiction here. Imagine if blue States opened investigations into members of Trump’s cabinet some years down the line?
I think it was in Vegas, but not sure about the locale, where cops arrived and killed the guy that had stopped the shooting.I hope to crap if that were me, I'd be thinking about the people who are actively being shot at, not what might happen when the police get there.
So, basically you are after revenge rather than justice. Where does it end, as power shifts at each election cycle?Blue states have Done that to Trump and some of his supporters. New York, Georgia.....and they will continue to do it. Your argument is weak.
If anything they should try to bankrupt Fauci, just like they did to many of the Trumpsters trying to defend against the legal onslaught of the left.
In my world, turn around is fair play.
Problem is that many Republicans are too soft. In today's political landscape you have to be mean and vicious, just like the Dems.
Match them....blow for blow, and start making examples out of them.
And yes. .if you can't convict on some, at least make their lives a living hell. Just like the left has done to so many
Nice guy politics accomplishes nothing.
Revenge or justice.....I'll settle for eitherSo, basically you are after revenge rather than justice. Where does it end, as power shifts at each election cycle?
Regardless, I don't think States have the standing to go after a Federal employee especially when he wasn't even in their State when decisions were being made.
Can States prosecute Trump for causing gas prices to go up, for servicemen deaths due to his decisions? Can they prosecute Kennedy for measles deaths? Every action Federal government takes has winners and losers depending on who is on power. If States could go scorched Earth after their opponents leave office even less things would get done.
It is the other way around. They have to have standing and then try to prove Fauci violated a State law.If a state AG can prove Fauci violated a state law and can take jurisdiction over the defendant, then they have legal standing.
It is the other way around. They have to have standing and then try to prove Fauci violated a State law.
If you remember all the State prosecutions of Trump were due to his direct actions (fraud etc.) that violated State law. He is a convicted felon as found by the jury for violating NY State law before he was elected as POTUS.
In case of Fauci I fail to see how they can stretch State law to someone doing their job as a Federal employee.
There is a reason ICE told CA to pound sand when CA passed a law criminalizing wearing masks by law enforcement. Federal law trumps State law and States can't dictate how Federal employees do their jobs.
That is a pretty high bar to prove, he is not an ICE agent emptying his gun at a suspect while in the State itself.Federal law may Trump state law, but a federal employee who does harm to someone can be held accountable at a state level
Yet, you are advocating the same thing for Fauci.As far as that joke of a NY trial and conviction against Trump. That cesspool of a corrupt legal system had that case decided before Trump and his lawyers ever stepped foot into that courtroom.

I'm reserving judgement on this until I learn more. From what I can tell, if States made decisions relating to lockdowns, etc., based on his official guidance while that guidance he knew to be false, that could be construed as fraud. That makes it much less about revenge, doesn't it?Waste of resources. Fauci, regardless of what one thinks of him, was a Federal employee doing his job. Also, he was working in an advisory capacity and whatever decisions that were made by the Federal government in regard to mandates etc. we’re made by the executive branch.
States do not have jurisdiction here. Imagine if blue States opened investigations into members of Trump’s cabinet some years down the line?
A clear case of the Supremacy clause in the Constitution.You know, like you could lose your State Medical or Nursing license if you didn't follow the federal guidelines? Enquiring minds want to know.
No. President is a federal employee and he is immune from state prosecution if the crime is committed while he is in office.As far as that joke of a NY trial and conviction against Trump. That cesspool of a corrupt legal system had that case decided before Trump and his lawyers ever stepped foot into that courtroom.
Federal law may Trump state law, but a federal employee who does harm to someone can be held accountable at a state level
All the literature and studies clearly proved that the risk of cardiac complications from full blown COVID far far and away exceeded the extremely low risk associated with vaccine side effect. So which way do you want to roll the dice, RFK Jr?I'm reserving judgement on this until I learn more. From what I can tell, if States made decisions relating to lockdowns, etc., based on his official guidance while that guidance he knew to be false, that could be construed as fraud. That makes it much less about revenge, doesn't it?
Of course, you'd have to prove he knew the guidance was false (the diary goes a long way towards helping that, doesn't it?) and you'd have to prove State decisions were based on Federal guidance, but I, for one, would like to know.
I mean, I had to accept a vaccination that I now know could cause myocarditis, amongst other heart issues (https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/46/Supplement_1/ehaf784.4601/8308391?login=false). This is not conspiracy theory stuff, this is documented. Meanwhile, we know that he was encouraging policies relating to mandatory vaccinations, while documenting in his diary that he doubted the vaccines. That's supposed to matter.
Of course, in my case, I was covered under federal regulations, and we all know that crime has been pardoned. But State policies? You know, like you could lose your State Medical or Nursing license if you didn't follow the federal guidelines? Enquiring minds want to know.