Hi
Hi
@Miletic
I agree that under 'normal circumstances' a 375 H&H would be adequate, I have seen it done. But what of when it isn't normal, when the buff charges? In our group the sample set I gave was eleven cases, of which one charged. There are nine others in our wider group that I am aware of and will add them in when I get all the facts. What I do know already is that of the broader number of twenty, two wounded buffalo charged. That is 10%. One was shot with a 375 H&H and one with a 450/400. I hear that the general statistics say about 5% charge, but ours is double that.
I wasn't at the second charge, but paced and did a lot of analysis on it afterwards and I am convinced that if the PH didn't have his 500 Jeffrey the outcome would have been disasterous. His three shots into that buff were decisive in this case.
So my decision, which I made right there and then at the charge site was that at least one person in the follow up group must always have a serious stopping rifle, by which I am defining it to be a 470 or above. Preferably a double, but that is asking a lot. Not all PH's have a good stopper but I am personally insisting that one is there, so I decided to supply one myself and if there are two, even better.
The reason that I am putting a scope on the 500J is because in our group the preference has been to use my 450/400 for anything close, say up to 30 metres, so the lead shooter carries the double. And to switch out to the scoped 375H&H for longer shots out to a maximum of about 100 metres. All that is changing is that the 500J takes that scoped role and the scope comes off for a followup.
So what of the 450/400 double? I will be actively looking to replace it with a 470 or a 500. Yes, I know this is over the top. But the people in the group that will be using it, not just me, must be given the maximum reasonable means to hunt these very dangerous animals. Why wouldn't I do that?