Field28
AH elite
A volunteer fireman that scuba dives, drives a jeep and shoots a 6.5 creedmore walks into a bar...
What does he talk about first?
What does he talk about first?
What year of Jeep?A volunteer fireman that scuba dives, drives a jeep and shoots a 6.5 creedmore walks into a bar...
What does he talk about first?
What year of Jeep?
You make a good point, small calibers on big game are a scalpel not a hammer. The problem that I have run into repeatedly is guys using large calibers to compensate for piss poor shooting. I see it time and again where guys go buy a 300wm or similar because thats what all the old heads say kill elk. They buy 2 boxes of the cheapest junk ammo they can find and use a box of that to get into a dinner plate sized group at 100 yards because they flinch so violently. They they call that perfect and say that I shoot a big enough gun to make up for it and call themselves lethal at 500 yards. If that same guy had gone with a 6.5cm, prc, or 270 he would be significantly more lethal and comfortable.The problem with the smaller calibers such as the 6.5 and the others that you listed can also leade to wounded lost elk very easily.
I had a coworker who knew absolutely nothing about hunting and he had a 14 year old boy who wanted to go elk hunting. So off they went to the local sporting goods dealer to find a rifle.
Once there and after telling the salesman what they wanted a rifle for he proceeded to sell them a . 243 bolt action.
Now I have no doubt that a 243 will kill a elk, but in the hands of that 14 year old I would highly doubt it, but he may wound a few.
I see a future where any cartridge with more recoil than a 22LR will be too much for hunters. The art of recoil management is going the way of the manual transmissions and basic car maintenance.
And this is my biggest problem with the entire argument posited by that particular group of people on that particular website- poor results like that will never make it onto their all-authoritative data set. They will be ignored. The small caliber people have become dogmatic about the subject, the data are skewed and therefore unreliable, and we have no idea how much wounding and loss of big game is happening due to their (bad?) influence.My son is a believer in the RS (website) line of thinking about a tiny cartridge with low recoil and a bullet with the proper construction. This caused him the loss of a large black bear that he shot twice at close range with a 6.5 Grendel.
My first rifle was an old surplus Soviet M91/30. Bought it for $50 back when you could pick them out of a barrel at your local sporting goods store. The stout recoil of the 7.62x54r and the steel butt plate forced me to learn how to shoot a rifle without getting bruised or flinching. Those were good days... A rifle for $50 and 20rnd packs of surplus ammunition for $2 each.You know, I still remember the day that my Dad bought me my first shotgun. I was eight years old.
We went to a great old shop. My Dad told the guy behind the counter that he was buying me a shotgun and asked, should I get him a 410 or 28.
The typical gunstore old fella with a 1911 on his hip said, "410 will make that boy a pussy later when it comes to recoil!"
He then handed my Dad a H&R single shot 20, kicked like a mule!
To this day I dont flinch!
I think that issue is not tied to any caliber.You make a good point, small calibers on big game are a scalpel not a hammer. The problem that I have run into repeatedly is guys using large calibers to compensate for piss poor shooting. I see it time and again where guys go buy a 300wm or similar because thats what all the old heads say kill elk. They buy 2 boxes of the cheapest junk ammo they can find and use a box of that to get into a dinner plate sized group at 100 yards because they flinch so violently. They they call that perfect and say that I shoot a big enough gun to make up for it and call themselves lethal at 500 yards. If that same guy had gone with a 6.5cm, prc, or 270 he would be significantly more lethal and comfortable.
I am absolutely not an advocate for shooting tiny calibers on big critters though it may sound like I am. What I am an advocate for is shooting a cartridge that you can PROPERLY handle and the simple fact is that most folks can not handle more than a 30-06 out the gate. Yes it can be learned but it takes time, money, and effort and those are 3 things many are not willing to invest. I would much rather see a guy packing a small cartridge capable of stacking rounds on top of each other rather than a gun he isn't willing to admit he hates or is scared shitless to shoot.
I would not. Not saying it cant be one. Just i think theres a few things happening that make it not a good one.I'd like to pose a question to those saying that the 6.5cm is adamantly not an elk capable cartridge. Would you be willing to hunt elk with a 7-08 instead of a 6.5cm?
TBH, I have brakes or suppressors on just about everything I shoot, except for my lever guns. My wife is just too small to handle the full glory of a 300 PRC without assistance and I'm not 18 anymore. Why deal with full recoil if you don't have to?Just an observation from an old Fudd. In my 55 years of shooting at gun ranges I have noticed a deterioration in proper mounting and holding the rifles as well as trigger and breath control discipline. Along with or possibly because of, an increase in recoil aversion. Spray and pray is not conducive to kill shots. Perhaps it would help if ranges required members to shoot with a shooting coach ( if you will) on their first visit.
yah - 147,000 members and this is the best thing we can find to talk about ...I can't believe we are even discussing using wounding size calibers for elk size game.