Politics

I actually agree with your argument that nether age group really understands what the other has experienced. This much I do know. It’s remarkable how many people are receptive to the idea that the deck is stacked against them. That they’ll never exceed expectations. They’ll gladly sit on their arse and wait for “some weird trick” to make them rich. Or elect people to office who understand how to channel their angst to their benefit. Meanwhile, those that do work hard, avoid the big mistakes, save and invest, and pray, more often than not, get ahead.
Agree with this. Almost every generation thinks the one after them doesn’t work as hard and makes bad decisions. And most romanticize what the previous generation had.

Some things are harder for a 20 year old today and some are easier.

Mint every baby boomer hit it big. My parents didn’t. Some of that was choices some was bad luck. They prioritized spending on private education for 4 kids and ensuring we had paid for college and if we wanted graduate school. Combine that with some bad breaks in business and they never built wealth. Do t tell me they didn’t work hard because they did I watched them.

They are comfortable in retirement but not traveling except to stay with kids and see grand kids. My dad never got to Africa as he dreamed but my brother and I did take him to Argentina and for a grizzly in Alaska.

I got lucky with some choices I made early in life but I have friends who didn’t. Some of them worked harder that I did and got less out of it. So I’m 50 and my brother and I are taking our first trip to Africa next year. And I’ll probably book trip 2 at DSC. I’d have gone earlier but a divorce did set me back.

My point js it is t so easy as work hard and save money for any generation. There is luck involved and timing and circumstances.

But the bottom line is we should all care about making the world a better place now and in the future. We won’t get there by blaming or shaming people. Let’s just figure out how to provide the most opportunity to the widest selection of people. Sometimes that means policies that don’t benefit us directly or even hurt us a little. But it’s better for the country in the long run which ultimately means alls of us in the long run.

But that’s not a fun attitude in the screaming news shows or political theater and not good fodder for internet debates.

Sorry for the rant.
 
Agree with this. Almost every generation thinks the one after them doesn’t work as hard and makes bad decisions. And most romanticize what the previous generation had.

Some things are harder for a 20 year old today and some are easier.

Mint every baby boomer hit it big. My parents didn’t. Some of that was choices some was bad luck. They prioritized spending on private education for 4 kids and ensuring we had paid for college and if we wanted graduate school. Combine that with some bad breaks in business and they never built wealth. Do t tell me they didn’t work hard because they did I watched them.

They are comfortable in retirement but not traveling except to stay with kids and see grand kids. My dad never got to Africa as he dreamed but my brother and I did take him to Argentina and for a grizzly in Alaska.

I got lucky with some choices I made early in life but I have friends who didn’t. Some of them worked harder that I did and got less out of it. So I’m 50 and my brother and I are taking our first trip to Africa next year. And I’ll probably book trip 2 at DSC. I’d have gone earlier but a divorce did set me back.

My point js it is t so easy as work hard and save money for any generation. There is luck involved and timing and circumstances.

But the bottom line is we should all care about making the world a better place now and in the future. We won’t get there by blaming or shaming people. Let’s just figure out how to provide the most opportunity to the widest selection of people. Sometimes that means policies that don’t benefit us directly or even hurt us a little. But it’s better for the country in the long run which ultimately means alls of us in the long run.

But that’s not a fun attitude in the screaming news shows or political theater and not good fodder for internet debates.

Sorry for the rant.
Great post! Enjoy your first safari!
 
Agree with this. Almost every generation thinks the one after them doesn’t work as hard and makes bad decisions. And most romanticize what the previous generation had.

Some things are harder for a 20 year old today and some are easier.

Mint every baby boomer hit it big. My parents didn’t. Some of that was choices some was bad luck. They prioritized spending on private education for 4 kids and ensuring we had paid for college and if we wanted graduate school. Combine that with some bad breaks in business and they never built wealth. Do t tell me they didn’t work hard because they did I watched them.

They are comfortable in retirement but not traveling except to stay with kids and see grand kids. My dad never got to Africa as he dreamed but my brother and I did take him to Argentina and for a grizzly in Alaska.

I got lucky with some choices I made early in life but I have friends who didn’t. Some of them worked harder that I did and got less out of it. So I’m 50 and my brother and I are taking our first trip to Africa next year. And I’ll probably book trip 2 at DSC. I’d have gone earlier but a divorce did set me back.

My point js it is t so easy as work hard and save money for any generation. There is luck involved and timing and circumstances.

But the bottom line is we should all care about making the world a better place now and in the future. We won’t get there by blaming or shaming people. Let’s just figure out how to provide the most opportunity to the widest selection of people. Sometimes that means policies that don’t benefit us directly or even hurt us a little. But it’s better for the country in the long run which ultimately means alls of us in the long run.

But that’s not a fun attitude in the screaming news shows or political theater and not good fodder for internet debates.

Sorry for the rant.
Spot on

If hard work alone made people rich, every farmer I know would be financially independent before 40 and the wealthiest people in society
 
The terrorists name is Jihad. Literally Jihad.


The man who carried out an attack at a synagogue in Manchester on Thursday which left two Jewish people dead and three others injured has been named by police as Jihad Al-Shamie.

Al-Shamie, a 35-year-old British man of Syrian descent, drove a car at people outside the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue before attacking people with a knife. He was shot dead by police at the scene.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) said three further people had been arrested as part of the investigation into the "terrorist incident".
 
Why is it that people will focus on just one element of this chain and criticize the whole thing? Of course hard work isn’t the only thing. Saving, investing, avoiding life’s big mistakes and some luck are all parts of a virtuous chain that will, more often than not, generate wealth. Nothing seems to anger some people more than the idea that we have more control over our destiny than does mere chance.
 
Why is it that people will focus on just one element of this chain and criticize the whole thing? Of course hard work isn’t the only thing. Saving, investing, avoiding life’s big mistakes and some luck are all parts of a virtuous chain that will, more often than not, generate wealth. Nothing seems to anger some people more than the idea that we have more control over our destiny than does mere chance.
Yep!
 
Why is it that people will focus on just one element of this chain and criticize the whole thing? Of course hard work isn’t the only thing. Saving, investing, avoiding life’s big mistakes and some luck are all parts of a virtuous chain that will, more often than not, generate wealth. Nothing seems to anger some people more than the idea that we have more control over our destiny than does mere chance.
If you’re referring to me I wasn’t criticizing anything. I was merely pointing out that really neither side is right or wrong in the debate that is occurring here. Both are both right and wrong in my view.

Nothing I said was in anger at all. I can promise you anger has no part in it.

I believe the reverse of your statement is also true. That many people are very angered by the idea that chance could overcome all the hard work one puts into their life.

Maybe the debate really is how much of a role chance plays, and maybe the answer is unknowable and event different from person to person.
 
Indeed. If I am not laid off. Frankly I feel safe, but who really knows with the rhetoric coming out of the White House? And my only complaint/observation in sharing that was that the messaging was the same.

You’re in thoughts and prayers.. shut downs are always difficult…

Xi do think you’re right in your assumption of safety though… if they go the lay off route I think they’re going to go for the notably fat agencies, and agencies that the American people typically hate and/or agencies typically aligned with the left..

If I worked at the EPA, IRS, dept of ed, state dept, etc I’d likely be very nervous about the rhetoric…

I’d also be nervous if I were a GS15 or SES/SIS.. almost all fed agencies are extremely top heavy… if you want to crush their soul, you take out 1/3 of the senior leadership team, and send a very clear message to all of the other SES left behind..
 
You’re in thoughts and prayers.. shut downs are always difficult…

Xi do think you’re right in your assumption of safety though… if they go the lay off route I think they’re going to go for the notably fat agencies, and agencies that the American people typically hate and/or agencies typically aligned with the left..

If I worked at the EPA, IRS, dept of ed, state dept, etc I’d likely be very nervous about the rhetoric…

I’d also be nervous if I were a GS15 or SES/SIS.. almost all fed agencies are extremely top heavy… if you want to crush their soul, you take out 1/3 of the senior leadership team, and send a very clear message to all of the other SES left behind..

Thanks Dave.
 
You’re in thoughts and prayers.. shut downs are always difficult…

Xi do think you’re right in your assumption of safety though… if they go the lay off route I think they’re going to go for the notably fat agencies, and agencies that the American people typically hate and/or agencies typically aligned with the left..

If I worked at the EPA, IRS, dept of ed, state dept, etc I’d likely be very nervous about the rhetoric…

I’d also be nervous if I were a GS15 or SES/SIS.. almost all fed agencies are extremely top heavy… if you want to crush their soul, you take out 1/3 of the senior leadership team, and send a very clear message to all of the other SES left behind..

I hope you are correct, and I hope they do that as well. My last assignment, A1 was the most rank heavy (civilians) on the entire base and created their own little empire. There are 4-5 letter (A1XYZ) GS-14, & 15s without supervising anyone, meanwhile, if anyone at other agencies looked to upgrade their employees (like me), we would get the, you don't supervise enough civilians, or supervising active-duty military member doesn't apply, blah, blah. Unfortunately, for one reason or another, no one wants to take on A1 and they continue to get away with sh*t like this.
 
I spend a fair amount of time in Vermont. Orvis is the major employer in that State and something fairly interesting is going on. Orvis laid off hundreds upon hundreds of workers recently (virtually everyone in and around the town of Manchester lost their jobs). The inside scoop is that they are trying to find a buyer for all their clothing, rip the tags off, and rebrand them, rather than doing a full liquidation.

Yesterday, I received this note from Orvis explaining their future trajectory:


[td]

To our Orvis family,
Since 1856, we’ve been guided by the same purpose: to make world-class products that inspire generations of adventure in the field and on the water. It’s what drove us in our earliest days, and it’s what drives us now as we set our sights on the next 169 years.

We’re stepping into an exciting new chapter—one focused on our core passions of fly fishing and wingshooting. This return to our roots is a renewed dedication to innovation, a commitment to our angling and upland communities, and to the wild places we love.

As we sharpen our focus, you’ll see special savings on Last Release products that won’t return once they’re gone.

[/td]



I personally think Orvis is screwed. Let me explain why.

Orvis once was "the best" retailer in the USA for fine hunting, fishing, and apparel. 30 years ago the Orvis reels were made in England by "Hardy of Alnwick", the Orvis shotguns were enhanced versions of guns made by Beretta and others. The coats and jackets were made in the UK by Barbour. The boots were made in France by Le Chameau. The CFO (Charles F. Orvis) clothing line was very high quality and was made in the first world.

Two things happened.

First, virtually everything they retailed was coming out of the third world, yet the prices were very high. They chased technology and had their reels made in Korea. Their shotguns were no longer higher quality "white labeled" items, they were just the same Italian guns you could buy for less from a hundred other dealers. They sold off Gokey, an american luggage and footwear company and started carrying third world shoes.

Second, their owners finally got caught in their wokeness. You see, in Vermont you can be a leftist and still like hunting and fishing like their owners. However, there is a smug condescension that you can catch and release trout and you can shoot grouse and pheasants, but you're NO FRIEND OF OURS if you hunt big game, go on safari, or own rifles. Their gun room was forbidden from selling rifles until fairly recently, even if consigned used rifles. Their magazines that showed amazing lodges were just catering to bird hunters and fly fisherman, nothing else was permitted.

And that is why their move to liquidate all the crap they've been making and selling while focusing on their core hunting and fishing clientele is going to fail badly. They alienated the purists by substituting plastic junk for what used to be first-world tackle. They ignored the traditional fly fisherman that uses cane and fiberglass trying to create fast-action carbon rods that are just like the soulless rods made by many far more famous operations. They had waders made in China that they wanted to charge more for than Simms waders. The final nail in the coffin is they have crapped on their core community, sportsman. In my sporting circles we don't have "good sport" and "bad sport", ANY hunting and fishing done ethically is "Good Sport". But not so with Orvis, the Perkins family has always had a lefty elitism that didn't want to cater to the broader interests of an outdoor hunting and fishing company.

Orvis ran themselves into the ground and it is doubtful they can bounce back because they don't have a loyal hunting customer base and there is nothing special about chi-com fishing tackle and Kenya-made dry flies.
 
Screenshot_20251003-200529_WhatsApp.jpg
 
Photo on left makes me think of @ActionBob He has a few miles of lay flat just to reach the various fields.

People would have to think twice about protesting Bob’s businesses. :ROFLMAO:

Shitarsemer needs to go on an agricultural fact finding mission there me thinks..... :A Thumbs Up:
 
Media is so disingenuous.
https://apple.news/AzgkWra3WSE20qpVzSgrB5A

Mother of 3 in US for 30 years deported by ICE

After that headline if one reads the article, one discovers that…
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) told Newsweek that the Atlantic City Police Department charged Balbuena Soto with criminal mischief for damage to private property, home invasion burglary with intent to inflict harm, possession of a weapon, unlawful possession of a weapon, and conspiracy to commit home invasion burglary.
And…
DHS said Balbuena Soto had a prior conviction for shoplifting, had been removed from the U.S. four times previously, and illegally reentered the country a fifth time, which constitutes a felony.

Of course, most will just read the headline and get outraged.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
64,161
Messages
1,413,197
Members
128,990
Latest member
sunwinannlivyoung
 

 

 

Latest profile posts

Beautiful Aardwolf for our Spanish client and good friend Alberto
WhatsApp Image 2025-11-12 at 17.27.22 (2).jpeg
C-YA-L8R wrote on PaulB's profile.
Hi PaulB,
I have a Ballard Arms Model 1885 chambered for .333 Jeffery Flanged. Do you have any idea where I can get ammo for this?

I am new to this forum so I am sorry if I am doing something wrong!
Thank You!
Bruce D
Lakewood Village, California

BALLARD ARMS MODEL 1885 .333 Jeffrey Single Shot Falling Block SN 1178 - (1).jpg
BALLARD ARMS MODEL 1885 .333 Jeffrey Single Shot Falling Block SN 1178 - (2).jpg
BALLARD ARMS MODEL 1885 .333 Jeffrey Single Shot Falling Block SN 1178 - (11).jpg
BALLARD ARMS MODEL 1885 .333 Jeffrey Single Shot Falling Block SN 1178 - (5).jpg
STARCHEDUPDAD wrote on Acopperdawg's profile.
what's up buddy how are you doing today
Updated available dates for 2026!

1-27 feb is open
13-31March is open
1-10 April is open
17-30 April is open
1-6 May is open
24-31 May is open
12-18 June is open
24-30 June is open
1-17 July is open
August is now fully booked
7-30 September is open
October is wide open

Get your hunt booked today!
 
Top