Having started this thread I am seeing something interesting emerge - price is not the difinitive indicator of high or low end, it is quality. And leaning upon the thread of my friend
@Muskox on bolt rifle regrets it seems that the difinitive indicator of quality is reliable performance. No high end bolt gun, no matter how well finished cuts it if it gives trouble feeding, extracting or just kicks way too much. Equally, no high end double gets any extra points if it is unreliable in any way.
But I would like to add a twist, and that is that many base end offerings in either category offer absolutely reliable, even excellent performance. So in a way the cost divide is still there, but it starts at lower numbers in each category.
Let me explain: I know it is not a bolt gun, but my scoped Ruger No1 30-06 PG rifle is to me the ultimate. There is nothing I would change, not even it's plain, but perfectly proportioned woodwork. My double is a plain Jane Heym 89, nothing fancy, but performs flawlessly. Simple perfection. And it didn't cost a fortune.
Maybe it is just me and age creeping on, bit simple quality has become my life moniker, that is why I changed my Rolex GMT Master 2 for the elegantly simple Explorer, simple perfection again.