WWF Position on Trophy Hunting in South Africa

Conservation Force

Contributor
AH senior member
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
61
Reaction score
49
Website
www.conservationforce.org
Media
8
Articles
29
Member of
Conservation Force
WWF-South Africa regards hunting as a legitimate conservation management tool and incentive for conservation, and regularly engages with major game hunting associations to promote ethical hunting and combat inhumane practices.



We aren’t opposed at all to trophy hunting and wholeheartedly support the proactive, science-based, in-situ management of plant and animal populations and the sustainable consumptive use of surplus stocks, but oppose canned hunting where animals are specifically bred for hunting outside of natural systems.

• Canned hunting detracts from the principle that activities which involve the sustainable consumptive use of natural resources should be based on the management of the renewability of such natural resources. Therefore, the management of such “canned” species has no incentive for the future conservation of such species, nor their required natural habitats.
• Incentives for canned hunting are not based on the well being of the species and thus generated income doesn’t benefit conservation.
• Canned hunting negates the principle of “fair chase” which is the fundamental basis for the hunt.

Trophy hunting is defined as “a specific form of wildlife use that involves payment for a hunting experience and the acquisition of a trophy by the hunter”. WWF recognises the diversity of cultural attitudes and opinions with regards to trophy hunting. Trophy hunting occurs and ultimately, it is up to local communities and their local and national governments, to determine how they use their natural resources to benefit people, species and habitats.

Many countries utilise trophy hunting as a wildlife conservation and management tool within the broader framework of sustainable use programmes. When improperly managed, trophy hunting can have serious detrimental impacts on wildlife. Thus, in some circumstances, WWF provides scientific and technical advice to relevant stakeholders (e.g. government and local authorities, local communities and private landowners), to improve the management of such programmes, to assist them in providing benefits to species populations and/or habitats, and local communities.

WWF acknowledges that trophy hunting, where it is scientifically based and properly managed, has been proven to be an effective conservation and management tool in some countries and for certain species. That is particularly the case in areas where alternative sources of income or land use practices are unlikely to bring in much needed funds for people or wildlife, or to create sufficient incentives for conservation (as opposed to other forms of land use). In addition, there is evidence that in some areas where trophy hunting is used as one of a range of conservation tools, poaching of both the hunted species and other species in the habitat has been reduced.

However, WWF recognises that the trophy hunting of threatened species may appear at odds with their conservation, particularly those that are seen as icons of the natural world and as powerful symbols of the need for concerted action. WWF urges that for threatened or endangered species, all other conservation incentives and activities be fully explored before considering hunting them for trophies.

WWF believes that where trophy hunting is practiced, it must benefit the conservation of the species or population involved in the wild or its habitat and provide benefits for local communities as an incentive for their participation.

WWF believes that a significant portion of revenue generated from trophy hunting should be re-invested into conservation programmes. Furthermore, trophy hunting must always benefit the conservation of the species or its habitat and provide benefits for local communities.

Best practice standards for trophy hunting programmes
WWF strives to ensure the relevant stakeholders implement best practice standards, including:

  • A science-based approach to providing benefits to species and their habitats.
  • An adequate legal framework to regulate all aspects of the trophy hunting programme (e.g. quota-setting, trophy standards, national laws and regulations, professional guide and hunter standards).
  • Adequate implementation capacity at local and national levels (e.g. administration, enforcement).
  • A science-based monitoring and administrative framework (e.g. quota setting, population trends, adaptive management).
  • Maximizing economic and social benefits to enhance conservation.
  • Adherence to accepted humane standards, including ensuring that methods used are as humane as possible
  • Respect for local cultural attitudes.
  • Weighing the potential benefits to the species and local communities against the risks, erring on the side of precaution.

Read the full text on the WWF website: http://www.panda.org.za/article.php?id=527
 

Attachments

  • aj114e06.pdf
    64.5 KB · Views: 169
Last edited by a moderator:

BRICKBURN

Super moderator
Contributor
Lifetime titanium benefactor
AH ambassador
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
22,808
Reaction score
16,843
Location
Canada
Media
412
Articles
23
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
2
Europe
1
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa, Botswana, Mozambique, Canada, USA, Mexico, England
....................... WWF urges that for threatened or endangered species, all other conservation incentives and activities be fully explored before considering hunting them for trophies.
................

For instance?
 

Royal27

AH ambassador
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
9,456
Reaction score
13,336
Media
109
Articles
5
Hunting reports
Africa
6
Member of
DSC, NRA, SCI
Hunted
USA - TX, CO, GA, ID. Africa - Zimbabwe, Zambia, and South Africa (Limpopo and EC)
^^^

So after how much population loss to a species should hunting once again. He considered, as a last resort of course?
 

Royal27

AH ambassador
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
9,456
Reaction score
13,336
Media
109
Articles
5
Hunting reports
Africa
6
Member of
DSC, NRA, SCI
Hunted
USA - TX, CO, GA, ID. Africa - Zimbabwe, Zambia, and South Africa (Limpopo and EC)
And don't take me wrong, not all bad at all, just still work to do, or clarity to add.

It will definitely take us all.
 

siml

AH legend
Joined
Nov 26, 2013
Messages
3,438
Reaction score
5,261
Media
143
Articles
3
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Hunted
SOUTH AFRICA, BOTSWANA, NAMIBIA, ZIMBABWE, MOZAMBIQUE, ENGLAND, U.S.A
I think it is a pretty positive article, WWF needs to explain this to US F&W.
 

enysse

AH ambassador
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Messages
11,687
Reaction score
4,246
Media
136
Hunting reports
Africa
8
USA/Canada
1
Member of
Northeast Wisconsin SCI chapter, Lifetime member of NRA,RMEF
Hunted
Namibia, South Africa (East Cape, Guateng and Limpopo)
It's largely positive, not based on emotional BS.
 

Royal27

AH ambassador
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
9,456
Reaction score
13,336
Media
109
Articles
5
Hunting reports
Africa
6
Member of
DSC, NRA, SCI
Hunted
USA - TX, CO, GA, ID. Africa - Zimbabwe, Zambia, and South Africa (Limpopo and EC)
^^^

So after how much population loss to a species should hunting once again be considered, as a last resort of course?

Post fixed... I hate when I type on a phone and don't realize how many stupid mistakes I made!
 

wesheltonj

AH legend
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
2,396
Reaction score
2,426
Location
South Texas
Media
17
Articles
7
Hunting reports
Africa
2
Member of
Benefactor-Life NRA, Life SCI, DSC, HSC
Hunted
USA, RSA
Unable to find the full report, link is bad. The executive overview is quite favorable, but the press will never pick it up, does not fit the narrative.
 

CAustin

Bronze supporter
AH ambassador
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
14,297
Reaction score
11,515
Media
258
Hunting reports
Africa
7
Member of
Courtney Hunting Club, NRA Life Member, SCI Kansas City Chapter
Hunted
South Africa, KwaZulu Natal, Kalahari, Northwest, Limpopo, Gauteng, APNR Kruger Area. USA Georgia, South Carolina, Arkansas, New Mexico, North Carolina and Texas
I missed this when it was first shared. Wish it had been on the front page of USA Today.....maybe a few antis would read and learn
 

Lrntolive

AH fanatic
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
539
Reaction score
382
Location
Colorado
Media
2
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
RMEF, SCI, NRA, WCF&W
Am I the only person who caught this line, "That is particularly the case in areas where alternative sources of income or land use practices are unlikely to bring in much needed funds for people or wildlife, or to create sufficient incentives for conservation (as opposed to other forms of land use)."

Hunting is only good if there is no other option. Find another source of revenue and hunting is out. That's the way I read it. Maybe I'm missing something.
 

edward

Gold supporter
AH legend
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
2,408
Reaction score
2,817
Media
264
Articles
11
Hunting reports
Africa
1
Member of
safari club,nra,d.s.c.
Hunted
south africa and zimbabwe.alaska and several lower 48 states.
I think it is a pretty positive article, WWF needs to explain this to US F&W.
i believe f&w already know the benefits of hunting but are controlled by the antis and there fore are going to keep siding with them until he and they are hopefully replaced with someone who cant be bought and who will be on the side of the wildlife and the hunters.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
36,207
Messages
682,058
Members
62,417
Latest member
jugjzxrf
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

Rickmt wrote on Justbryan's profile.
What is your new shorter rifle? Thanx Bryan !
raamw wrote on neckdeep's profile.
Supply your address so I can get shipping Paypal Friend (no ) fee) is fine
Viral_SIGness wrote on Rifle57's profile.
Great person to deal with. Fast communication and quick shipper!
Sarg wrote on Philippe's profile.
Hello Philippe, did you get my PM that I sent you earlier ?

Regards Mark
raamw wrote on AfricaHunting.com's profile.
Can you advise me to properly post pix, sometimes I get it right sometimes not
 
Top