Who wore it better? One guy sees everything. (Ivan Carter I suspect). The elephants potentially coming in on the periphery. The ability to not just see through the sight, but to see past it with two eyes opened. Ready.
The other guy: Fully engaged into a tubular optic. Likely using monocular vision because you’d be looking at turrets as well. No cross eye view to the right because the tube obstructs a peripheral view with the opposing eye.
Maybe I’m inferring something that isn’t there, but it feels to me like the tacticool preferences trying to infect a form-meets-function dangerous game scenario. I don’t want to hunt infidels, I want to hunt DG. It just feels like a dozen justifications to use a seal-team-6 oriented optic on a hunt when they weren’t really designed for that application.
Obviously, the shot is .000001% of the days activities on a DG hunt. The other 99.99999% of the time I’d be removing Mopane leaves and Jess thorns from the clogged up larger optic while cursing under my breath.
thanks for your reply bob , is it feasible to build a 444 on a P14/M17 , or is the no4 enfield easier to build? i know where i can buy a lothar walther barrel in 44, 1-38 twist , but i think with a barrel crown of .650" the profile is too light .
hey bob , new on here. i specifically joined to enquire about a 444 you built on a Enfield 4-1 you built . who did the barrel and what was the twist and profile specs ? look foward to your reply . cheers
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.