All three of my kids have hunted to a fair extent, but the middle one is and always has been the fanatic of the bunch. I took him to Africa when he was 9 on his first trip, he brought his bow and did some archery hunting spot and stalk and then he had his 7x64 mauser for Kudu, Eland, etc. On his second trip when he was ten he brought his 375HH for elephant and croc. We didn’t connect on elephant that trip, the government scout was a very annoying woman that ruined stalks shrieking that they were charging…they weren’t, they were 100 yards away.
He had plenty of fun, but he also was a fanatic and had a significant amount of hunting experience in the States from age 6 on up, both wing shooting and big game hunting.
It’s all about the temperament of the kid and their skills that decides if it’s a good idea or bad idea at a given age.
One thing I really disagree with is the posts above that effectively say “make it hard on them, make them earn their stripes by hunting X, Y, Z first”. Um, no. I can’t afford to take my kids on duck hunts, it costs as much as a week in Africa. Hell, our put and take pheasant club costs as much per day as a day in DG camp. My kid’s New Mexico Oryx hunt all-in after drawing his tag cost more than getting on a plane and flying to Africa to shoot a wild Oryx in their native habitat. If you can have your kids hunt 100 days a year for “simple” quarry so they can “earn” their stripes, consider yourself filthy rich. A hundred days of turkey, deer, pheasant, rabbit, duck, goose, grouse, and woodcock hunting would be a king’s ransom compared to going on an elephant hunt. Access to land and resources doesn’t grow on trees, many parents have to decide what is the most economical approach to sport. Africa, ironically, is cheaper than many American hunts I’d love to do with my kid like Sitka, Mulies, or a good Elk Hunt.