Vintage double rifles regulated with soft nose bullets..

Pondoro

AH elite
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
4,592
Media
109
Articles
2
Hunted
Norway, Sweden, Namibia, Botswana and South Africa
I have something puzzling me..I have a 1906 vintage Joseph Lang in .450/400 3 1/4 NE.. On the barrel it reads "Regulated for 60 grains cordite and 400 grain soft nose bullets"..

According to John Taylor the 450/400´s were THE allround medium rifle before the .375H&H emerged and 1906 was the heydays of elephant hunting. Buffalo was also shot with solids only due to inferior soft nose bullets. So why regulate for/with soft nose..? Perhaps made for India with tiger in mind...or the african cats..? Customer specs..?

So my question is, how common was it to regulate the .450/400´s for softs..?
 
The solids of yesteryear were for the most part made from gilding metal, which was relatively soft and not as heavy-duty on barrels as steel-jacketed solids. Regulating with softs was fine as the solids of the day probably shot pretty much the same in any event.
 
It was intended to be used for tiger hunting in India. Back in those days, the .450/400 Nitro Express was almost universally preferred by Indian tiger hunters. Elephant hunting was banned in India in 1873, so most double rifles under .500/465 Nitro Express caliber (which would be used for gaur bison or water buffalo) intended for Indian shikar would definitely be regulated with soft points (with tigers, leopards & Asian sloth bears in mind).

But of course, solids could also be used in the rifle. The Kynoch soft points and round nosed gilding metal jacketed FMJ solids both regulated to the same point of impact.
 
I did shoot some prewar Eley ammo with solids..had to stop that due to duds and afterburners..

I will load it with Woodleigh softs only I think..
 
I did shoot some prewar Eley ammo with solids..had to stop that due to duds and afterburners..

I will load it with Woodleigh softs only I think..
Or Wim Degol tombac jacketed FMJ solids. These are built to the original specifications and profile of the pre 1950 Kynoch gilding metal jacketed FMJ solids.

And guaranteed not to cause strain on old rifle barrels.
 
Golam..do you have a link to Wim Degol bullets..?
 
Or Wim Degol tombac jacketed FMJ solids. These are built to the original specifications and profile of the pre 1950 Kynoch gilding metal jacketed FMJ solids.

And guaranteed not to cause strain on old rifle barrels.

I would not be so sure about that.

Vim Degol recently made FMJ bullets for me and on this occasion informed me that his bullets have much thicker walls than those from Woodleigh. He certainly also makes thin-jacketed bullets, but not for all calibers.
 
I would not be so sure about that.

Vim Degol recently made FMJ bullets for me and on this occasion informed me that his bullets have much thicker walls than those from Woodleigh. He certainly also makes thin-jacketed bullets, but not for all calibers.
But grand veneur, he told me that his tombac jacketed FMJ solids are safe to use even in pre World War I double rifles.
 
But grand veneur, he told me that his tombac jacketed FMJ solids are safe to use even in pre World War I double rifles.

Sure you can use such bullets in old double rifles, I do that too, but the bullet maker don't know your rifle. Everyone has to take the condition of his rifle into account and handle accordingly on their own responsibility, but if you are not so sure about what you are doing, you are always on the safe side with thin-jacketed soft point bullets.
 
I did shoot some prewar Eley ammo with solids..had to stop that due to duds and afterburners..

I will load it with Woodleigh softs only I think..
I had a 1908 DR Westley Richards. I only used woodleigh in softs and their FMJ and nothing else for fear of ruining the barrels otherwise
 
I had a 1908 DR Westley Richards. I only used woodleigh in softs and their FMJ and nothing else for fear of ruining the barrels otherwise

Typically thin skinned game like Lion, Leopard, Kudu, Eland, etc uses a double rifle soft with .025” to .035” thick gilding metal jackets. The heavy buffalo softs are usually .065”.

I would hope that FMJ traditional solids would use the .065” jackets to ensure the steel jacket never touches the rifling, but I’m uncertain.
 
I highly recommend listening to @rookhawk on your vintage DR. He advised me and worked extremely well
 

Forum statistics

Threads
64,653
Messages
1,423,632
Members
131,565
Latest member
NolaWoolne
 

 

 

Latest posts

Latest profile posts

bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
thanks for your reply bob , is it feasible to build a 444 on a P14/M17 , or is the no4 enfield easier to build? i know where i can buy a lothar walther barrel in 44, 1-38 twist , but i think with a barrel crown of .650" the profile is too light .
Duke1966 wrote on Flanders357's profile.
ok $120 plus shipping
teklanika_ray wrote on MShort's profile.
I have quite a bit of 458 win mag brass, most of it new. How much are you looking for?

Ray H
bigrich wrote on Bob Nelson 35Whelen's profile.
hey bob , new on here. i specifically joined to enquire about a 444 you built on a Enfield 4-1 you built . who did the barrel and what was the twist and profile specs ? look foward to your reply . cheers
 
Top