- Joined
- Jun 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,912
- Reaction score
- 25,499
- Location
- Shreveport, Louisiana
- Media
- 281
- Articles
- 5
- Member of
- NRA, DSC
- Hunted
- Nam, Zam, Zim,RSA (Eastern Cape & NW), Canada, NZ, Alaska, TX, LA, MO, OH, MT, ID, WA, WY
Heaven forbid we look into it and create a solution. It’s not like they can’t be cut into manageable pieces. We can always grind them up and use it for packing around nuclear waste barrels.Yeah I will be waiting to see what 170’ long blades are recycled into![]()
![]()
If Russia and/or China attacked the U.S, would NATO jump into the fight? I have serious doubts that they would. You would probably just sit back and watch.Since Trump by now has made sure that any potential adversary knows that its unlikely that he would order the US to assist other Nato allies it would be better if he simply left. Obviously it would not make Europe stronger, but on the other hand it would not make us weaker either due to the first paragraph above.
I think it would be much better for europe to truly know that we are on our own instead of having some dream or fantasy that things will return to normal once Trump is gone...
When China places their boot on your neck, you will reassess who is the real danger! Why in Hell can't you wait a little over two years and find out who has always been your ally?If China makes a move against Taiwan I have a feeling that the numbers in this recent article from Politico might change:
View attachment 760936
![]()
More Europeans see US as threat than China
Washington outranks Beijing as a threat in Spain, Italy, Belgium and Germany, according to POLITICO European Pulse survey.www.politico.eu
I assume the numbers in the chart above are a result of the US behavior under the present Trump administration concerning Greenland and similar threats towards Europe.
I got that, I tried to be ironic but its always hard when not face to face, anyway thats why I used the:Thanks for having a sense of humor on this. I was only joking..(but, seriously, c’mon it’s ours.)
-smiley.Yes, most of it is really sad reading, both the fact that many europeans seems to think the US is more dangerous then China and of course also the part about poor defense will or what to call it.The most telling thing in that article is that their polling shows that only 19% of Europeans would take up arms and fight if their own country was attacked…
So Europe worries that the US won’t be there to defend it if it is attacked and Article 5 is invoked..
But less than 1/5th of the population would bother to fight to defend itself..
If more than 4 out of 5 Europeans truly think it’s someone else’s job to defend them in the event of foreign invasion, Europe deserves to lose the right of self governance when that invasion occurs..
It’s one thing to say you dont want to fight.. it’s quite another to say you wont fight..
Maybe he does…Rumors claiming Patel has a drinking problem, or is it another Democrat red herring?
House Democrats probe FBI Director Kash Patel over drinking allegations | Fox News https://share.google/6n9IuAPgNLdh2Fdro
I think that Nato will answer if Russia attacks since their attack is most likely to happen within the parts of the world that is included in the treaty. If China attacks I have a feeling that it will be in the Pacific or in the Indian Ocean and therefore outside the parts covered by the treaty. I like to think that Nato would assist but I guess that if they do that will be "outside the perimeter of the alliance" so to say.If Russia and/or China attacked the U.S, would NATO jump into the fight? I have serious doubts that they would. You would probably just sit back and watch.
Yet, here you all are crying about Trump's stance on NATO.
I did not said that I personally think that the US is more dangerous then China for Europe, it was more intended like a discussion starter, my point was more that if China attacked Taiwan then european opinion would most likely turn against China and be more pro-US despite Trumps actions.When China places their boot on your neck, you will reassess who is the real danger! Why in Hell can't you wait a little over two years and find out who has always been your ally?
Swamp members all have a get out of jail free cardMaybe he does…
If the D’s are so concerned about a POSSIBLE drinking problem with Patel…
When are they going to get serious about looking into the possible drinking problem of Pelosi?
Its POSSIBLE they got some uranium from the US in the last 47 years.. but I think thats pretty unlikely.. we know exactly where they got most of their uranium from..
prior to 1979, the US, France, and Germany all provided (sold) Iran with uranium for the purpose of building energy reactors..
they also have significant uranium deposits within their own borders that have been mined.. Saghand Mine and Gachen Mine are the most notable..
and.. we know they got most of their nuke technology the AQ Khan network in Pakistan and from China..
I dont think there are any huge secrets behing where the uranium comes from or who has been providing them with the tech and the knowledge to turn that uranium into weapons grade materials..
the issue is no one has had the balls to do anything about it until now..
What I find interesting is the US has been very public about hitting all of the Iranian uranium processing facilities.. but there is no evidence (to my knowledge) that we have hit the actual mines...
I would imagine we'd want to figure a way to collapse those mines in on themselves.. the uranium mines are very deep "tunnel" type mines.. while they could always dig them back out, I'd think dropping a couple of jdams down the main and vent shafts would be in order and would make it a little harder on them going forward to extract more uranium to replace what we have rendered inaccessible to them or what we're ultimately going to take from them..
Narcissism is actually quite common and can be assessed as an attribute in many situations.It’s surprising how many people seem surprised or feel duped about the governor of Virginia and her seemingly 180° direction change from campaigning to governing.
If you look into her past government work, you’ll see what her role was. Then look into what that role entails. The personality traits people in that role must have to be successful. They aren’t positive traits, and are often viewed as defects in society.
Rumors claiming Patel has a drinking problem, or is it another Democrat red herring?
House Democrats probe FBI Director Kash Patel over drinking allegations | Fox News https://share.google/6n9IuAPgNLdh2Fdro
