Putin will never honor any deal.
There's only 2 ways to end that war.
1. Putin gets what he wants
2. Foreign troop's and heavy hardware join the fray and pound Russia's army into oblivion or retreat.
The real question that needs to be answered is what is it that we want? Thats where there seems to be confusion..
What Z wants and what Putin want really shouldnt matter to the US (or the EU or anyone else honestly).. what should matter is what we (and the EU, and NATO, etc) all think is in our strategic interest...
Its estimated that the war has cost the Russians between $1.3T and $1.69T in GDP so far, depending on which source you believe.. Russia supposedly has experienced 21% inflation and is starting to see a "brain drain" as educated people and professionals have left the country in notable numbers... theyve lost $10B in arms sales globally.. and obviously their military hardware has been drained by huge numbers..
With Russia being our noted enemy for the better part of the last 75+ years.. all of the above would appear good, and in our strategic interest..
so as long as Russia isnt rapidly advancing and is continuing to cost themselves trillons, create devistating inflation, and decimating their military hardware.. maybe we would like them to continue down that same path for a bit longer?
but.. at what cost? and is that cost in our strategic interest? and is the trade off between the two worth it?
While I find no joy in young men getting thrown into a meat grinder, no matter what their nationality is.. the equation related to what is best for the US in all of this is incredibly complex.. and unfortunately, it might require tens of thousands more Ukrainian and Russian soldiers perishing, and several more years of fighting before it all gets figured out...
I wont begin to pretend that I know what the best answer is... On one hand I'd love to see Ukraine fully restored tomorrow and the Russians be forced to pull back to Moscow with their tails between their legs and spend the next 10+ years licking their wounds and having to focus on recovering their economy, and rebuilding their war machines before having to think twice about them on the world stage again..
But on the other hand.. I wonder if its not better for the US (and Europe for that matter) to keep the Russians pre-occupied for another 2-3 years.. let them continue to drain their population of smart and experienced people.. continue to run inflation at insane levels until the economy just collapses on itself.. and let them lose another 5 or 6 war ships and another 50 aircraft that all have to be replaced.. and essentially remove them as a "near peer" threat for 20-30 years (or perhaps forever).. leaving us only needing to focus on the Chinese for the forseeable future..
Where the balance point between the two is, and why.. I dont know...
I do love the idea that one of the major BRICS players isnt nearly as "major" as it once was.. and that its going to be a long while before it matters again though.. no matter which final direction is taken..