sgt_zim
AH ambassador
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2017
- Messages
- 5,285
- Reaction score
- 21,096
- Location
- Richmond, Texas
- Media
- 33
- Articles
- 1
- Member of
- NRA, Houston Safari Club Foundation, NWTF
- Hunted
- South Africa, Idaho, Texas, Louisiana
Not exactly. This review has been scheduled since the inception.
Article 34.7 of the USMCA1 requires the parties to hold a “joint review” of the agreement six years after its entry into force, which is July 1, 2026.2 In the review, the parties may submit recommendations for revisions to the agreement, which the group would consider. Article 34.7 also establishes that the agreement expires in 2036 unless the parties confirm in writing that they wish to extend it for another 16 years. The six-year review in 2026 is the first opportunity for the parties to notify that they approve or oppose renewal of the agreement in 2036. A notification that a party opposes the 2036 renewal would trigger further review meetings until the negotiators address the dissenting party’s concerns or the USMCA expires.
Looks like Jimmy might be looking for new employment.

1819news.com
Well California has apparently banned Glock pistols because they are "easily convertible"
So if you live in California you have until Jan 1st 2026 to acquire one.
Can one party make the agreement null and void on their own, or do all parties need to agree?Members of the Trump administration have insinuated USMCA will be gone and two bilateral agreements will replace it. There is a legal protocol that is being followed. This is the first step. The individual posting that I cited is actually a Canadian who seems to understands this.
While they’re at it, they should figure out a way to block it from entities whose main business isn’t farming. Farmland needs to be in the hands of the farmers, not part of a portfolio.This is proposed legislation I can support.
![]()
'Common sense to protect our food and fiber supply chain': Dale…
In an effort to further examine threats facing America’s agriculture and food supply from agroterrorism, U.S. Rep. Dale Strong (R-Monrovia) convened a…1819news.com
“The congressman urged fellow legislators to swiftly pass the "Protecting America's Agricultural Land from Foreign Harm Act." The bill, led by Strong, would block farmland purchases by adversaries like China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.”
It is not the gun laws in the US that matter but the gun laws in individual States. A legal purchase in TX, if it were to occur in IL, CA, NJ or NY could put you in jail as a felon forever prevented from ever owning a gun.What are the gunslaws in the US these in regards to a privat sell of a handgun?. Back when I lived in Alabama one could buy guns at fleemarkeds. The gunshop owners I knew said one could trade/sell up to 12 guns a year without FFL. How is that these days?.


One without a sense of humor....like KimmelWonder which Federal Judge will reinstate Kimmel![]()
It varies a lot from state to state.What are the gunslaws in the US these in regards to a privat sell of a handgun?. Back when I lived in Alabama one could buy guns at fleemarkeds. The gunshop owners I knew said one could trade/sell up to 12 guns a year without FFL. How is that these days?.
One without a sense of humor....like Kimmel
It is not the gun laws in the US that matter but the gun laws in individual States. A legal purchase in TX, if it were to occur in IL, CA, NJ or NY could put you in jail as a felon forever prevented from ever owning a gun.
Don't forget the various ammo restrictions.You could put it that way.
In NJ. All handgun person-to-person sales must go through an FFL, in-state. The purchaser must have a valid (one-time use) handgun permit in possession.
The onerous part about NJ gun laws, other than the CCW restrictions, is the stupid single-use HG permit deal.