So, recently we had a thread of best looking rifle ever, and this has brought me to the question, I cannot simply answer to my self. In the same time, we all have an idea about rifles in several categories.
So, in your own view, what is:
- Bespoke rifle
- Fine rifle
- High end rifle
- Costum rifle (if different then above)
- Lower end rifle
- Budget rifle
- Working men rifle
- any other category you may add (like safe queen, or working gun)
Obviously this is a very personal thing, depending on ones attitude to art, quaity, design and inanimate objects generally, but I think that for me, there are basically 2 categories of rifle:
- Fine Rifles
- Mass market rifles
The Mass market rifle is a tool. It's not trying to be a statement, it's not supposed to be 'special', but it does provide function and reliability at a reasonable price. Examples would be Savage, Tikka, Winchester, Remington, Blaser, Marlins etc. Nothing wrong with these at all, they're great firearms and compise the majority of most peoples collections, but you don't expect 'art'.
This category can be further split into 'working' rifles, which focus on function to the exclusion of all other considerations (a stainless synthetic Savage for instance) and general 'mass makert' rifles, which do offer features which aren't functionally useful (walnut stocks and nice blueing for instance), but still come at a reasonable cost and make a degree of compromise in production process and materials to that end.
On the subject of cost, I think the price of the rifle has little bearing on where it sits. A synthetic stocked Blaser is a relatively expensive gun, a 'PH' grade double is even more so. Still working guns.
A lot of 'Custom' guns also sit in this category for me, if their design brief was around 'the best functional rifle', as opposed to 'a thing of beauty'. I'm thinking custom target rifles specifically, but also stuff like super light weight custom hunting rifles.
The fine rifle on the other hand, isn't really about function at all. Obviously it should work flawlessly, but then so should a $400 Savage, so that alone hardly justifies the price. What defines and justifies a fine rifle is craftsmanship. It's as much a piece of art as it is a tool. You'd expect the finest materials, you'd expect hand work, you'd expect a degree of customisation. You might expect unique designs or brands with history. You'll almost exclusively be talking about a walnut and blue piece. Examples include Rigby, Purdey, High grade Mausers, classically styled and finished custom makers, a lot of classic / historic rifles where that hand finishing was the norm.
Again, it's not really based on price. A vintage Mauser based custom gun might be closer in price to a bog standard Blaser than a H&H double, but if the design and production ethos is there, it's still a 'fine rifle'. I would say however that some of the things intrinsic to the fine rifle category will, by necessity, increase the price.
I'd fininsh by noting that the brand is also not the be all and end all, nor even is the design. A Ruger No.1 can sit quite comfortably as both a fine rifle, or a mass market rifle, depending on quality of fit and finish and the design philosophy of the specific variant.